IamJoseph

Any sayings about the topic of the day - Rome's decree of heresy? The Gospel writers must have been on a club med - they forgot to mention a Holocaust in their midst. That's like the NT Times not mentioning 9/11 on 9/12. That's a lie-by-omission.

The hands that did the genocide of a million Jews claimed Goddidit and revelled and sang IN JC Halleluyah. But my history lessons says NEGATIVE - the Europeans who became Christians did it - same as with the 2nd Holocaust. Someone is telling fibs.

IamJoseph

Negative. The Jews paid their taxes, even when these were made higher than that of all other nations. The revolt began when Nero resurrected Caligula's heresy decree. The Jews refused to conduct sacrifices for Rome's depraved Emperors, even rejecting Titus' compromise to house those statues in the temple's outer forecourt. The Jews became the only nation which challenged Rome on the grounds of Belief.

Rome lost - the Jews passed the test better than Abraham, sacrificing nation and all their substance - a display of belief never seen in history - there was no surrender to Rome's beliefs. To know truth of Israel - one must not rely on Christian or Islamic texts - both are contradictions from here to kingdom come.

xaxxat

You make my head hurt...

IamJoseph

How would one who never followed the laws know, and why would one believe a Roman document which says so. If Europe followed Hillel, as opposed the Gospels, millions of innocent souls would not have perished.

'WHAT IS HATEFUL TO YOU - DO NOT UNTO OTHERS' [Hillel].

The European church murdered more innocent humans than any other in all Geo-History - far more than did Rome - even when ignoring their last two worst centuries of all. Because it followed depraved Rome for 1800 years and reversed Hillel's majestic teachings with this brazen calamity:

'WHAT IS GOOD FOR YOU - IS GOOD FOR OTHERS'

'BETTER TO DESTROY THEIR BODIES AND SAVE THEIR SOULS'

[Isabela of Spain, now deemed a Saint!]. Ugh! :constern02:

Very confusing.

arnoldo

The gMark may have been written before 70 A.D and recorded events which occurred many years earlier.

arnoldo

Yes, the Jews rendered unto Caesar what was Caesar's.

premjan

If they had to pay higher taxes no wonder they rebelled.

IamJoseph

Nothing to do with taxes. The first initiation of the war was Eleazar's ceasing of all sacrifices for Rome - this was in effect a declaration of war [Josephus]. The ruling for sacrifices was first initiated by a depraved Roman named Caligula - which Herod refused to enact, knowing it would cause open war. In 66 CE, depraved Nero resurrected this decree - and the rest is history. This was a theological battle for the right to freedom of belief - confronted by the Jews - alone again - naturally. And Mighty Rome lost.

The catholic church, which boastfully prefixed its name with that of depraved Rome - assuming also the heritage of the Hebrew bible, thinking Israel was dead - has never forgiven the Jews for existing and even resurrecting herself and a 2000 year dead language.


If there is ever proof that some Jews revelled with beedy eyes over the death of another Jew at the hands of the Romans, or that there was ever a trial as listed in the Gospels - I would readily agree this was a terrible and evil thing. But the ball is in the hands of the Gospel writers and those who accept those reports as truth: prove it. I know that Mad [2000 lashes per frame] Mel believes it.

The only applicable question is, what if the Gospels report is a total fiction by Rome - like the blood libels and the Protocols. How would Christians respond to the Jews? That's not a hypothetical question.

arnoldo

See: Eusebian Fiction Postulate

IamJoseph

How did the Quran come to accept some of the Gospels, I wonder. If a certain part of the Gospels is fiction [e.e. Immaculate birth - condoned as divine revelation by the Quran] - it will impact Islam also. This says why the jews are in the most dangerous situation the past 2000 years and a wonder they still exist.