FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-16-2011, 10:18 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: ZIP 981XX
Posts: 8,268
Default Logical Inconsistency of the Bible

New topic stemming from post #734 in the "Why is the Bible so contradictory" thread.

simon kole, I'd be very interested in hearing/reading your explanation of what you see as the "basic logical inconsistency of the Bible" below, with a chance for further discussion on that topic. Thanks!

(Bolding added by me to the pertinent lines near the end of this quoted section; other bolding was in the post linked above):
Quote:
Originally Posted by simon kole View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saramago View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by simon kole View Post
# 50: Who was to blame for originial sin?

Adam was to blame for originial sin (Ro 5:12).

Adam was not deceived, Eve was deceived (1Tim 2:14).
But Adam disobeyed anyway, because of Eve.
Adam was the first human created and, therefore, from whom original sin is inherited.
No; according to the story and as you have said, everything happens according to God's plan. God was/is to blame for "original sin" (in the story, even if he doesn't exist IRL).
And both statements are true. This is the basic logical inconsistency of the Bible, which I may choose to address.
But if I do, I will have to start a new thread because of all the objections and responses it will generate.
Saramago is offline  
Old 06-17-2011, 08:54 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: southwest
Posts: 1,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saramago View Post
New topic stemming from post #734 in the "Why is the Bible so contradictory" thread.

simon kole, I'd be very interested in hearing/reading your explanation of what you see as the "basic logical inconsistency of the Bible" below, with a chance for further discussion on that topic. Thanks!

(Bolding added by me to the pertinent lines near the end of this quoted section; other bolding was in the post linked above):
Quote:
Originally Posted by simon kole View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saramago View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by simon kole View Post
# 50: Who was to blame for originial sin?

Adam was to blame for originial sin (Ro 5:12).

Adam was not deceived, Eve was deceived (1Tim 2:14).
But Adam disobeyed anyway, because of Eve.
Adam was the first human created and, therefore, from whom original sin is inherited.
No; according to the story and as you have said, everything happens according to God's plan. God was/is to blame for "original sin" (in the story, even if he doesn't exist IRL).
And both statements are true. This is the basic logical inconsistency of the Bible, which I may choose to address.
But if I do, I will have to start a new thread because of all the objections and responses it will generate.
Okay, guys, I may delay until next week (and then I may not), because I am going out of town this weekend, and won't be back until Thursday.
<and I need first to build a shelter in which to take cover after my post>
simon kole is offline  
Old 06-17-2011, 09:05 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: ZIP 981XX
Posts: 8,268
Default

Have a nice trip (vacation, hopefully)!
Saramago is offline  
Old 06-18-2011, 06:22 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: ZIP 981XX
Posts: 8,268
Default

Copying this post from here in the thread, "Why is the Bible so contradictory", so simon kole can find it again (to address) when he returns from his trip. (Or possibly before he goes)

Quote:
Originally Posted by simon kole View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zenaphobe View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by simon kole View Post
Depending on the text and on the book of the Bible it is in, "clear" will be what is in agreement with the rest of the Bible.
The Bible claims to have one Author, which makes it one book. Therefore, correct understanding will be in agreement with the rest of the book.
The Bible makes no such claim.
Are you sure about that?

2Tim 3:16 - "ALL Scripture is God-breathed (Gr, theo-pnuestos)"- from the very breath (Spirit) of God.

The Bible makes the very clear claim that ALL Scripture has the same Author, God's Holy Spirit.

And Peter groups Paul's writings with the "other Scriptures."

2Pe 3:16 - ". . .(Paul's) letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction."
Quote:
As for a correct understanding, in case you haven't noticed, there are plenty of interpretations of what the Bible teaches that can not all be correct.
None are correct if they do not agree with the rest of the Bible.
Quote:
I'm sure you've heard about the little divide among Christians referred to as Calvinism and Arminianism? Both sides claim the Bible as the source of their understanding of salvation, and yet, they can not both be right.
To be more clear, the issue there is not salvation, which is by faith in Jesus Christ.
The issue there is how really dead (Eph 2:1,5; Col 2:13)) is man's spirit before it is resurrected to new life
in the new birth?
Is it dead dead, or is it capable of responding in some way?

Calvinists say it is dead dead (for that is what dead means).
Arminians say it is capable of responding (which means it's not really dead).

Both sides have good Scriptures to support their positions, which means there is a basic dotrinal inconsistency
in the Bible.

STAY TUNED. . .the basic logical inconsistency and the basic doctrinal inconsistency of the Bible will be addressed
on Saramago's thread: The Logical Inconsistency of the Bible.

Both inconsistencies are resolved in the same way.

<and then we're stopping the earth so I can get off> :wave:
Quote:
Maybe the Wheel of Power can help us determine if the Bible has one Author



:Cheeky:
Saramago is offline  
Old 06-18-2011, 08:35 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,810
Default

Anything written by man is bound to fail.
aeebee50 is offline  
Old 06-18-2011, 09:28 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Florida Panhandle
Posts: 9,176
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aeebee50 View Post
Anything written by man is bound to fail.
That's sure encouraging, with proposal time coming up on my job....
dockeen is offline  
Old 06-18-2011, 09:31 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: ZIP 981XX
Posts: 8,268
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dockeen View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aeebee50 View Post
Anything written by man is bound to fail.
That's sure encouraging, with proposal time coming up on my job....
Ah, but we have the answer up above: cut & paste your proposal from the Bible. That should do the trick...
Saramago is offline  
Old 06-18-2011, 10:05 PM   #8
Contributor
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Alaska!
Posts: 14,058
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aeebee50 View Post
Anything written by man is bound to fail.
Did you write that yourself, man?
Wiploc is offline  
Old 06-18-2011, 10:36 PM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: ZIP 981XX
Posts: 8,268
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiploc View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aeebee50 View Post
Anything written by man is bound to fail.
Did you write that yourself, man?


simon kole said above that "the basic logical inconsistency and the basic doctrinal inconsistency of the Bible will be addressed" after he returns from travel in ~5 days. That gives us 5 days to figure it out before he returns.

I'm leaning towards "God works in mysterious ways" perhaps quoting Isaiah 55:8 ("for my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways") though really Isaiah 55:9 might be better for making sure those darned atheists recognize that God's word trumps all ("As the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts").

There's also the "arguments" that (a) "God is infinite, we are finite" and/or (b) "God is at once infinite and finite". I don't know whether either is based on a specific verse in the Bible, but regardless of whether it comes from the Bible or an apologist's wet dream, I don't see how that helps explain inconsistencies. Some people seem to think being infinite would give God a pass or something.
Saramago is offline  
Old 06-18-2011, 10:59 PM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 9,233
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saramago View Post
simon kole said above that "the basic logical inconsistency and the basic doctrinal inconsistency of the Bible will be addressed" after he returns from travel in ~5 days. That gives us 5 days to figure it out before he returns.
My take on this, and I think it's "consistent" with simon's beliefs, is that god can do anything, ANYTHING, ANYTHING.

She can violate natural laws, logical rules, anything that humans can think of as well as anything that human beings can't think of.

What you and I see as a logical inconsistency in the bible simply reflects our limited vision, You and I can't see that god can make a rock so heavy that she can't lift it but also lift it.

Omnipotence is a handy quality to have.
Jaybees is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:38 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.