Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-09-2008, 01:13 PM | #141 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,366
|
Quote:
|
|
01-09-2008, 02:27 PM | #142 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Belle, Missouri
Posts: 92
|
Why Believe?
Quote:
If the Bible isn't inerrant, then why believe it? Why not just put it on a shelf with all other religious books and forget about it? I have never understood the mentality of those who say that the Bible isn't inerrant, but they still call themselves Christians. If I thought the Bible wasn't inerrant, a Christian would be the last thing I would call myself. In Christ Jesus Jerry D. McDonald jerry@challenge2.org http://www.challenge2.org |
|
01-09-2008, 03:26 PM | #143 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 16,498
|
Quote:
When I was 18 I wanted to be a Christian minister. I couldn't agree more with the statement of yours I emphasized. I read every word of the KJV in the summer of my 18th year. At the end of the reading I found that I was non-Christian because I found that the Bible was so far from inerrant as to be unbelievable. My criticism of the Bible is all about its errancy. From Genesis (which has self-contradictory passages) to the synoptic gospels (which have contradictory passages) to the unbelievability that a just God would punish children for sassing Elisha's bald head. How do you reconcile the two versions of creation? Eve from a rib and both from clay? The different genealogies that 'justify' the prophecy about being "of the lineage of David"? The inherent evil in numerous stories like Elisha? Or the inherent evil in killing all the men, boys and non-virgins but commanding the taking of the virgins? If you believe what you say, how can you be Christian? |
|
01-09-2008, 03:47 PM | #144 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
|
Consider the following from a Christian web site:
http://www.allabouttruth.org/all-scr...ficial-faq.htm Quote:
|
|
01-09-2008, 07:10 PM | #145 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 36078
Posts: 849
|
Quote:
Why does the Bible have to be inerrant from cover to cover for you to believe the Christian message of the NT? |
||
01-09-2008, 07:31 PM | #146 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 16,498
|
Quote:
One among thousands: According to Col. 2:2-3 ("...and of Christ; in whom are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge") Jesus possesses all knowledge. But in Matt. 24:36 ("But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only") Jesus admits ignorance of the time of his "return." |
|
01-09-2008, 07:36 PM | #147 |
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 16,498
|
Another, just for grins:
JESUS' GENEALOGIES--One of the most discussed contradictions in freethought literature is the clash between the genealogies of Jesus found in Matt. 1 and Luke 3. One need only read the text to see that Luke traces the genealogy of Jesus from Jesus back to Adam and God while Matthew begins with Abraham and tracks it to Jesus. Luke lists 77 generations while Matthew has only 44. In order to see the problem in proper perspective one should create a chart listing the names in correct sequence in parallel columns. If horizontal lines are drawn to connect the same names, one can easily see that the lists are almost identical from Abraham to David. However, from David onward there is no similarity despite the fact that they both conclude with Joseph as the father of Jesus. The major reason for the contradictory names given after David is that the account in Luke traces the genealogy through David's son, Nathan, while that in Matthew traces it through another son, Solomon. This would easily account for the wide divergence in names following David but raises a couple of crucial questions: (a) How could Joseph and Jesus be descended from two different sons of David. How could two sons of David father two completely different genealogies which merge together with the last two individuals and (b) How could Jesus have contradictory genealogies?Thousands more at http://members.aol.com/ckbloomfld/ |
01-09-2008, 07:38 PM | #148 |
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 16,498
|
Don't trust McKenzie? Then try Bart Ehrman's Misquoting Jesus.
|
01-09-2008, 07:48 PM | #149 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
|
Quote:
http://www.allabouttruth.org/all-scr...ficial-faq.htm Quote:
At any rate, it doesn't matter since if the Bible said that God will send everyone to hell, you would reject the very same quality of evidence that you accept now, which proves that your emotional, illogical self-interest has caused you to reject any claims that you do not believe will ultimately benefit you. Not only that, but an excellent case can be made that the God of the Bible is immoral. If you wish to discuss this issue, we can do so at the GRD Forum. |
||
01-09-2008, 08:18 PM | #150 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tower of Babel
Posts: 557
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|