Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
11-16-2003, 09:09 AM | #11 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Minnesota, the least controversial state in the le
Posts: 8,446
|
Remember the example I gave...dude didn't kill himself, but was considered a suicide anyway...You may say this is Dante and not the bible, but Dante's literature has been more influential on christian culture than the bible has, and it was considered to be completely in accord with christian thinking of the time.
|
11-16-2003, 09:27 AM | #12 |
Contributor
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cylon Occupied Texas, but a Michigander @ heart
Posts: 10,326
|
Couldn't someone think that the Jews did the Kevorkian thing? Assisted suicide? Afterall, Jesus (if there ever was such a person) knew he would die. Instead of plunging a gladius through his own heart, which would have been the better dramatics and more honourable thing, he let the nasty evil Jews do God's (if there really is one) bidding. (remember, the Romans saw Jesus as innocent of Roman law)
|
11-16-2003, 09:44 AM | #13 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
|
Quote:
|
|
11-16-2003, 10:21 AM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hull UK
Posts: 854
|
Quote:
That's rich, Magus. You asking for evidence. 'scuse me while I go and dry my eyes.... |
|
11-16-2003, 11:05 AM | #15 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Selva Oscura
Posts: 4,120
|
A comparative study of Dante's and the Bible's influences on Christianity would be an interesting discussion indeed. In another thread, of course. The needling Magus segment, otoh, is inappropriate anywhere.
On the actual topic of the thread, I think Karen M makes a very useful distinction based on intent. This is a familiar legal differentiation applied to a person who kills someone else: it's the difference between justifiable homicide and 1st degree murder. If killing oneself to save the life of a friend would not be considered suicide, then surely allowing oneself to be killed to save the eternal life of everyone could not be judged as suicide either. The issue of whether Jesus' death actually saved souls is irrelevant. His intent is the applicable standard. |
11-16-2003, 11:13 AM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL Reality Adventurer
Posts: 5,276
|
If Jesus was god then he didn't die so talking of his death is hardly relevant. If Jesus was a regular person then the issue of suicide is still problematic since he was obviously deranged.
Starboy |
11-16-2003, 11:17 AM | #17 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
To make this more obvious his apostles had forsaken him and they were his eidetic images later to be re-called into the upper room. etc. |
|
11-16-2003, 11:42 AM | #18 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Selva Oscura
Posts: 4,120
|
Quote:
There are any number of other possibilities requiring neither insanity nor suicide: a popular preacher gets involved with political zealots, one of whom arranges his execution to save his skin, exaggerating Jesus' importance to distract Roman attention from the revolutionary cell, just to name one. Sure, it's a bit John LeCarre, but it's perfectly plausible. |
|
11-16-2003, 06:47 PM | #19 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
|
Quote:
|
|
11-16-2003, 06:55 PM | #20 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Gilead
Posts: 11,186
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|