FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-29-2008, 10:52 AM   #471
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The temple of Isis at Memphis
Posts: 1,484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldo View Post
Did Alexander the Great have a Navy? If not how did he destroy Tyre?
I can't believe you asked this question. Are you really that uninformed on the history of Tyre?

Egads how embarrassing.

Here you are, trying to tell us that Tyre is some kind of fulfilled prophecy, when you don't even know the major facts about its military history?

Do you routinely try to lecture other people on subjects that you don't have the foggiest clue about yourself? :rolling:
Sheshonq is offline  
Old 01-29-2008, 10:54 AM   #472
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pale Blue Dot
Posts: 463
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldo View Post
]Encyclopedia Britanica "After a 13 year seige by Nebucanezzar, Tyre made terms and acknowledged Babylonian suzerainity
You just disproved yourself.

Quote:
Suzerain (Encarta Dictionary): A ruler or nation that controls a dependent nation's international affairs but allows it to control its internal affairs.
Basicly, they wouldn't do any conquering, and Neb obviously was receiving some form of tribute, but Tyre was still, essentially, INDEPENDENT. If Neb was successful in ANY way, shape, or form, such a 'generous' agreement would NEVER have been made.
Darklighter is offline  
Old 01-29-2008, 11:11 AM   #473
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Latin America
Posts: 4,066
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darklighter View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldo View Post
]Encyclopedia Britanica "After a 13 year seige by Nebucanezzar, Tyre made terms and acknowledged Babylonian suzerainity
You just disproved yourself.

Quote:
Suzerain (Encarta Dictionary): A ruler or nation that controls a dependent nation's international affairs but allows it to control its internal affairs.
Basicly, they wouldn't do any conquering, and Neb obviously was receiving some form of tribute, but Tyre was still, essentially, INDEPENDENT. If Neb was successful in ANY way, shape, or form, such a 'generous' agreement would NEVER have been made.
So you are arguing that Nebby conquered Tyre, right?
arnoldo is offline  
Old 01-29-2008, 11:14 AM   #474
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,962
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldo View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darklighter View Post

You just disproved yourself.



Basicly, they wouldn't do any conquering, and Neb obviously was receiving some form of tribute, but Tyre was still, essentially, INDEPENDENT. If Neb was successful in ANY way, shape, or form, such a 'generous' agreement would NEVER have been made.
So you are arguing that Nebby conquered Tyre, right?
STOP MAKING SHIT UP!! The walls were still there, the people were still there, Tyre was not a bare rock; ergo, prophecy failed.
makerowner is offline  
Old 01-29-2008, 11:15 AM   #475
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The temple of Isis at Memphis
Posts: 1,484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldo View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darklighter View Post

You just disproved yourself.



Basicly, they wouldn't do any conquering, and Neb obviously was receiving some form of tribute, but Tyre was still, essentially, INDEPENDENT. If Neb was successful in ANY way, shape, or form, such a 'generous' agreement would NEVER have been made.
So you are arguing that Nebby conquered Tyre, right?
1. What part of the phrase "ended in a draw" do you not understand?

2. The prophecy wasn't "conquer" anyhow; it was "scrape it bare like the top of a rock".

Nice try at moving the goalposts.
Sheshonq is offline  
Old 01-29-2008, 11:20 AM   #476
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Latin America
Posts: 4,066
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshonq View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldo View Post

So you are arguing that Nebby conquered Tyre, right?
1. What part of the phrase "ended in a draw" do you not understand?
Ok, Nebby and Tyre ended in a draw. So if Tyre was strong enough to end a confict in a draw it wouldn't be powerful enough to survive a 13 year siege,right?
arnoldo is offline  
Old 01-29-2008, 11:22 AM   #477
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The temple of Isis at Memphis
Posts: 1,484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldo View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshonq View Post

1. What part of the phrase "ended in a draw" do you not understand?
Ok, Nebby and Tyre ended in a draw. So if Tyre was strong enough to end a confict in a draw it wouldn't be powerful enough to survive a 13 year siege,right?
Another question showing the holes in your education. You have the sequence of cause-effect backwards.

The fact that they were strong enough to survive a 13-year siege is precisely WHY they were able force Nebuchadnezzar to a draw.
Sheshonq is offline  
Old 01-29-2008, 11:46 AM   #478
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pale Blue Dot
Posts: 463
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshonq View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldo View Post

Ok, Nebby and Tyre ended in a draw. So if Tyre was strong enough to end a confict in a draw it wouldn't be powerful enough to survive a 13 year siege,right?
Another question showing the holes in your education. You have the sequence of cause-effect backwards.

The fact that they were strong enough to survive a 13-year siege is precisely WHY they were able force Nebuchadnezzar to a draw.
Exactly. Arnoldo, In the case of a powerful nation carrying out a siege against a city, a "draw" of this kind is BETTER (almost a 'win' even) for the city than it is for the attackers, because the city is allowed to go back to buisness as usual. This point is made by Ezekiel when he says that Neb recieved nothing from Tyre, i.e. He FAILED to conquer the city.

It's clear as day my friend. Funny how God made it so that in order to understand the Bible, you cannot understand history. And vise-versa, if you understand history you cannot understand the Bible. Suks don't it? :huh:
Darklighter is offline  
Old 01-29-2008, 12:21 PM   #479
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarhitman View Post
Ezekiel predicted that Tyre the once great nation of trading would become a mere fishing site. Say what you will but this is exactly what Tyre has become today.
The only thing one needs to "say" is that your summary of the prophecy is inadequate and misleading. Tyre was to be destroyed and never rebuilt.

That has not happened.
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 01-29-2008, 12:23 PM   #480
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack the Bodiless View Post
Is all this waffling intended to distract us from the fact that what Ezekiel specifically predicted never actually happened?
No question about it.
Amaleq13 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:35 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.