FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-17-2003, 03:15 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default Dating the book of enoch

Are there many theories as to when the book of enoch was written?

Which is regarded as the best one?

thanks
judge is offline  
Old 12-17-2003, 08:16 AM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default Re: Dating the book of enoch

Quote:
Originally posted by judge
Are there many theories as to when the book of enoch was written?
The book of Enoch is a complex work made up of five different works, four of which were already written by the time of the community which used the Dead Sea Scrolls, where they circulated separately. The fifth section, called the Parables or Similitudes was written later and perhaps by a xian community (it features a form of the son of man title).

The first section, the book of the Watchers, is considered to have been written circa 200 BCE. It may feature a conflict within the Jewish priesthood.

The third section is the Astronomy Book, which features a solar calendar replacing the Persian 360 day calendar. It is believed to be the earliest part.

The fourth section contains the Animal Apocalypse, which includes allusions to Judas Maccabaeus, so it was written before 160 BCE.

The fifth section contains more miscellaneous stuff, usually called the Epistle of Enoch, and dating clues are not readily apparent, so all we can say was that it was written before the Qumran text deposit.

When the Enochian pentateuch was compiled into one volume is hard to say. The Ethiopic text gives no clues.


spin
spin is offline  
Old 12-17-2003, 03:05 PM   #3
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Monroeville, Ohio, USA
Posts: 440
Default

my opinion, everything we have today belongs to the maccabees.
maybe it was the queen mother Alexandria (Salome) who erased the existing and replaced it with her contemporary (c. 110 bc). It was not etched in stone. Let us have a scholar who wants to prove what WAS written, let's say, 201 b.c. And please give archeolgy evidence and other that can prove a difference. I mean, Genesis for example. Let's not make it arguative in this he says she says forum. Try King's, was it rewritten?
offa is offline  
Old 12-17-2003, 11:21 PM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by offa
my opinion, everything we have today belongs to the maccabees.
maybe it was the queen mother Alexandria (Salome) who erased the existing and replaced it with her contemporary (c. 110 bc). It was not etched in stone. Let us have a scholar who wants to prove what WAS written, let's say, 201 b.c. And please give archeolgy evidence and other that can prove a difference. I mean, Genesis for example. Let's not make it arguative in this he says she says forum. Try King's, was it rewritten?
Sorry, offa, but I couldn't understand much of what you are saying, in that it seems too concentrated without enough contextual hints for what you are referring to and how it relates to the topic at hand.

For example, what are you referring to with "everything we have today"? Why "queen mother"? How do you know about her "erasing" anything much? If the Alexandra you mention is the wife of Alexander Jannaeus, that would deal with a period after 100 BCE. And so on.


spin
spin is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:17 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.