FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-29-2009, 05:50 PM   #11
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

The previous thread on graffitti didn't get much further.

One of the comments to the article in the OP notes this Christian connection:
Quote:
1 John 4:13 "en toutō ginōskomen oti en autō menomen kai autos en ēmin oti ek tou pneumatos autou dedōken ēmin" which is translated in the NASB as "By this we know that we abide in Him and He in us, because He has given us of His Spirit."
Toto is offline  
Old 05-29-2009, 07:05 PM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default Zeus graffiti in which "in him we live, and move, and have our being,"

The earlier thread about Epimenides & Acts 17:28/Titus 1:12 is also very relevant.

What if the grafitti read:
"For in him we live, and move, and have our being,"
Would this indicate a christian hand in the first three centuries?
Or would this in isolation indicate someone who appeciated greek poetry about Zeus ?
The latter says Occam.
mountainman is offline  
Old 05-30-2009, 04:05 AM   #13
avi
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Location: eastern North America
Posts: 1,468
Default

Thank you Toto, both for the very interesting topic/thread itself, and for inclusion of "Russell Tasker's" comment, expanded a tad below:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto
One of the comments to the article in the OP notes this Christian connection:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russell Tasker
I did a bible search for the greek phrase that was found as graffiti and found 1 John 4:13 to be interesting, especially in view of the Apostle John's early association with Smyrna-1 John 4:13 "en toutō ginōskomen oti en autō menomen kai autos en ēmin oti ek tou pneumatos autou dedōken ēmin" which is translated in the NASB as "By this we know that we abide in Him and He in us, because He has given us of His Spirit."
Here is "Ben Witherington III's" original post, which led to "Mr. Tasker's" comment, above.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OP
One of the most interesting of Bagnall’s examples reads ό δεδωκως πvεύμα (“the one who has given the Spirit”—namely Kyrios, the Lord Jesus).
I have some questions about the Greek, here.
Obviously, Mr. Witherington has added "Kyrios" to the original graffito, right? In other words, he wishes to place Roger Bagnall’s “New Graffiti from Smyrna in the Context of Early Christianity”, (presented in 2008?) at the Boston conference of the Society for Biblical Literature, in a Christian context, so he ADDED "Kyrios" to his description of Bagnall's discovery, if I have interpreted this correctly.

This is similar to Mr. Tasker's capitalization of His, Him, He, or whatever, right?

I think one needs to focus on the GREEK, and forget the nonsensical English....

Here's my question:

How does
Quote:
ό δεδωκως πvεύμα
relate to

Quote:
en toutō ginōskomen oti en autō menomen kai autos en ēmin oti ek tou pneumatos autou dedōken ēmin
?

In particular, focusing on "pneumatos" versus "pneuma" , are we certain, without any doubt, that both words refer ONLY to "spirit", not to breathing, or the mechanics of air exchange, i.e. DEATH as a result of non-breathing. In my simplistic view, "dedikos", if that is the proper romanization of δεδωκως, would simply indicate "given up", as in, having stopped breathing.

In other words, why can this graffito not simply refer to one who has died, rather than supposedly representing hommage to a supernatural being who purportedly not only died, but more importantly, from the perspective of the "Christian" myth, was resurrected, i.e. recommenced breathing, after death?

Finally, then, shouldn't a graffito, from Smyrna, or anywhere else, make reference to the "resurrection", if it is to be regarded, (today, and two thousand years ago) truly "Christian"? Can someone on this forum, skillful with Greek, please write a simple Greek phrase, in Roman letters, to indicate what a graffito from that era could/should look like, i.e. expressing in the simplest possible manner, the notion of resurrection? Have similar graffitti been found in other large cities of that era, or only in Smyrna? What about Palmyra, for example?
avi is offline  
Old 05-30-2009, 05:48 PM   #14
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by avi View Post
Finally, then, shouldn't a graffito, from Smyrna, or anywhere else, make reference to the "resurrection", if it is to be regarded, (today, and two thousand years ago) truly "Christian"?
Logicially some form of "Christian referential integrity" is mandated.

Quote:
Can someone on this forum, skillful with Greek, please write a simple Greek phrase, in Roman letters, to indicate what a graffito from that era could/should look like, i.e. expressing in the simplest possible manner, the notion of resurrection? Have similar graffitti been found in other large cities of that era, or only in Smyrna? What about Palmyra, for example?
How about the Alexameno Graffito?

mountainman is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 02:32 AM   #15
avi
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Location: eastern North America
Posts: 1,468
Default

Thank you very much Pete, for teaching me about this ancient graffito, which, however, I do not find particularly indicative of belief in the supposed resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth.

As the Wikipedia article points out, crucifixion was common, until Constantine, so a second century graffito, like this one, focusing on crucifixion per se, does not convey, at least to me, conviction by the perpetrator, of faith in the divinity of Jesus.
avi is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:41 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.