FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-08-2012, 01:54 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default Sotto Voce digression split from using the term rabbi in the gospels

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iskander View Post
The Jewish annotated New Testament says this:
Quote:
Rabbi originally meaning “my master” became at an uncertain date the term for one qualified to pronounce on matters of Jewish law and practice.
Qualified by YHWH? Or by mortal man?

That's not Jewish, it's Gentile talk. It's nowhere near unique in imagined Judaism, either.
sotto voce is offline  
Old 02-08-2012, 01:57 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Qualified by YHWH? Or by mortal man?
The Rabbinate claims a line of descent from master to pupil starting with Moses.

Quote:
That's not Jewish, it's Gentile talk. It's nowhere near unique in imagined Judaism, either.
This is gibberish.
No Robots is offline  
Old 02-08-2012, 02:01 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by No Robots View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Qualified by YHWH? Or by mortal man?
The Rabbinate claimed to be a line of descent from master to pupil, starting with Moses.
But then 'rabbis' were masters of demonic fantasy. They should have been stoned.
sotto voce is offline  
Old 02-08-2012, 02:14 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by judge View Post
This word was never ever used in any sense prior to 70 CE.
But rabbis had existed since Moses!
sotto voce is offline  
Old 02-08-2012, 02:31 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
But then 'rabbis' were masters of demonic fantasy. They should have been stoned.
Compared to the Governing Body, the Rabbinate is positively benign.
No Robots is offline  
Old 02-08-2012, 02:33 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by No Robots View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
But then 'rabbis' were masters of demonic fantasy. They should have been stoned.
Compared to the Governing Body, the Rabbinate is positively benign.
Demons get around.
sotto voce is offline  
Old 02-08-2012, 02:37 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Demons get around.
Heh. You're okay, sotto voce.
No Robots is offline  
Old 02-08-2012, 02:40 PM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by No Robots View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Demons get around.
Heh. You're okay, sotto voce.
C'rect.

http://www.rense.com/general21/tal.htm
sotto voce is offline  
Old 02-08-2012, 02:42 PM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,679
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
You have to keep things in perspective here. Look at what the Greeks had to say about the barbarians.
No Robots is offline  
Old 02-08-2012, 03:01 PM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by No Robots View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
You have to keep things in perspective here. Look at what the Greeks had to say about the barbarians.
There is perspective there. But it illustrates one of the dangers and the folly of a rabbinate, of a caste of experts.

The danger comes in allowing oneself to be called 'Master', or 'Teacher' in the sense of an authority source. That is an act of hatred towards the person who does the calling, because that person should make up his own mind. That's the fundamental objection to 'rabbi' or 'Rabbi', to Catholic 'Father', even to Protestant 'Pastor'. Moses had no successors. That was the point, that he acted to lay down the rules for all Israelites to understand and put into practice. They were to 'wear it on their own foreheads', not trail off to a guru to get the SP.

“Listen, O Israel! The Lord is our God, the Lord alone. You must love the Lord your God with all your heart, all your soul, and all your strength. And you must commit yourselves wholeheartedly to these commands that I am giving you today. Repeat them again and again to your children. Talk about them when you are at home and when you are on the road, when you are going to bed and when you are getting up. Tie them to your hands and wear them on your forehead as reminders. Write them on the doorposts of your house and on your gates.' Deuteronomy 6:4-9 (NLT)
sotto voce is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:03 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.