Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
12-05-2008, 09:08 AM | #1 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Disability in the Bible
This Abled Body (or via: amazon.co.uk)
on googlebooks Hector Avalos was referred to at the Jesus Project, and I was interested in the reference to the above book he co-edited. Can anyone tell me more about his background? Looking at the introduction it got me very annoyed - I have a strong impression of someone with an apologetic agenda trying to fit square pegs into round holes. He references in a seemingly academic manner the alleged neo marxist influences on British Sociology of Disability, but the reality is he does not seem to be clear about his own biases. Am I misjudging the guy? |
12-05-2008, 10:20 AM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dancing
Posts: 9,940
|
I've read one of his books (The End of Biblical Studies (or via: amazon.co.uk)). According to a short bio he gave of himself at one of his presentations, he used to be an evangelical and went to ministry school to debunk atheists but found the lack of evidence for the events depicted in the bible (OT and NT) wanting and became an atheist himself.
|
12-05-2008, 11:09 AM | #3 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
|
12-05-2008, 11:17 AM | #4 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
I'm not sure what annoyed you about the casual reference to the neo-marxist origins of disability studies in Britain.
|
12-05-2008, 01:21 PM | #5 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Maybe its his academic style. I have been brought up on Goffman and similar, and the politics of disability are critical - there is a terrifying history of abuse of our fellow human beings, and he starts with a midrash on David going mad that really was an interesting attempt by a rabbi to square his belief in a god with a real experience of madness.
And for someone writing from a religious perspective, should I not expect authenticity? |
12-05-2008, 03:15 PM | #6 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Avelos is an anthropologist and writes from a social science perspective more than a religious perspective.
I'm not sure what you mean by authenticity. |
12-06-2008, 12:14 AM | #7 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Being an anthropologist makes the problem worse
It is factually incorrect to tie disability studies in Britain to neo Marxism - it is a far more nuanced ecology than that. And social anthropology uses completely different ways of thinking than he seems to be aware of. Is part of the problem the term professor? Compare: Quote:
The Introduction to This Able Bodied in discussing a history of disability studies in Biblical Studies makes the comment about neo Marxism I reacted to and is interesting in its silence about symbol and ethnography - the real roots of British disability studies - not neo Marxism which sees ethnography as basically capitalist within the system thinking. What is more interesting is his treatment of David as a real character when is it not accepted that is a clear story about madness, power and the gods? That is what I mean by authentic - not clearly outlining the subject, and seemingly giving religious studies views more validity than they deserve. It does read as a back scratching piece! |
|
12-07-2008, 06:47 AM | #8 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
|
Clive,
Could your dissonance be related to post-modern era reactions and counter reactions to traditional understandings of truth? Several "post-modern" writers have written about the subject, particularly Michel Foucault's analysis of the body and the self. Work that has been influenced by him also include feminist research on embodiment and gendered subjectivities, which seems to be very important to modern christian "liberal" critics and theologians. Some of those opposed to post-structural ("we trick ourselves into thinking we know more than we really do know") views often try to discredit them by associating such ideas with Marxism, Neo Marxism and relativism. DCH Quote:
|
|
12-07-2008, 02:29 PM | #9 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
I see in the Bible some typical attitudes that are predictable from extant belief systems - anyone with a blemish or fault is somehow not holy and cannot be a priest, madness is demon possession to be cast out, strange old women are witches and similar. There are some more humane attitudes but people have always cared for each other and not in varying circumstances - Darwin in Voyages describes the Feugans casting old women who could no longer help out into the winter and then hunting them down to eat them.
I do expect an anthropologist with a Pentecostal background to at least make reference to the reality of what has gone on in all societies without drastically oversimplifying the British disability movement to neo-Marxists! It is not hard to find modern examples of similar religious attitudes! http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007...gh.theobserver Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|