Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
12-08-2009, 05:36 AM | #1 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Myjava, Slovakia
Posts: 384
|
Archaeology on poly/mono/henotheism in Davidic era
I'd like some overview of what archaeology has to say about worship of single god / many gods / pantheon during Davidic era (around 1000-900 BCE) in the area of Israel and Judah.
I know there was some polytheistic stuff found (Yahweh and his Asherah, Baal), but I'd like some broader overview of what gods (and in what extent) were worshipped in the area. |
12-08-2009, 11:15 AM | #2 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hillsborough, NJ
Posts: 3,551
|
These are restrictive dates, I think the stuff below applies until the return from Babylon.
From Pagan Yahwism: The Folk Religion of Ancient Israel By Ephraim Stern - BAR May/Jun 2001 Quote:
Quote:
The centralization of worship in Jerusalem (if it actually happened) was not until much later. Before that temples generally had a similar design throughout Canaan. |
||
12-08-2009, 11:51 AM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,875
|
I think Dever's got a book (or via: amazon.co.uk) about Yahweh/Asherah worship though it's somewhat later than David. I'm a fan of Mark Smith (Origins of Biblical Monotheism (or via: amazon.co.uk)) but he's quite hard going compared to Dever. To be honest, Baal as Phoenician is anachronistic and ahistorical. Baal was a Canaanite god attested at Ugarit (c.1400 BCE) and clearly shares syncrestic features with El (the chief god of Ugarit) especially later on, as does Yahweh, who is so conflated with El that you have to use faint clues like Deuteronomy 32:8-9 (and this is why I'm also skeptical of an independent "E"). Part of the reason for the enduring struggle between Baal and Yahweh in the Bible is because Baal was indigenous, whereas Dagon or Chemosh were not, and their allure was only as good as the relative fortunes of the neighbouring states.
|
12-08-2009, 12:43 PM | #4 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Myjava, Slovakia
Posts: 384
|
Thanks for tips, I'll try to get those books. Lot of Mark Smith is online, unfortunatelly he seems to be centered around texts encompassing much broader area, and from centuries earlier, than my focus is.
Dates aren't fixed at all, anything post-davidic goes. I am interested in archaeologic evidence of heno/polytheism (preferably inscriptions, as those are quite undisputable) in the area of Israel. |
12-08-2009, 01:33 PM | #5 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hillsborough, NJ
Posts: 3,551
|
The scope of the Stern article I quoted was the Assyrian Period from about 721 to 586 BCE.
The most important hard evidence is the figurines, but he continues... Quote:
Also regarding the Asherah: Quote:
|
||
12-08-2009, 03:44 PM | #6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 88
|
See Dever, Zevit, Albertz.
Finis, ELB |
12-08-2009, 07:46 PM | #7 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Myjava, Slovakia
Posts: 384
|
Going over Zevit (much of him is available on google books), and so far it looks to be just what I needed (even though bit hard to grasp sometimes). Thanks!
|
12-09-2009, 05:53 PM | #8 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,808
|
In The Quest for the Historical Israel, even Amihai Mazar has come around to the henotheistic approach put forward by Dever.
The fundies will go nuts but scholarship seems to be moving against them. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|