Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
09-29-2003, 02:32 PM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,612
|
Bultmann on Romans
I remember reading somewhere that Bultmann had concluded that Rom.1.1-4 was a pre-Pauline address, which Paul had adopted to convey apostolic authority to the church at Rome. I can't remember where I read it.
Anyone got a specific reference for it? Regards, Rick |
09-29-2003, 03:03 PM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
|
Try Bultmann's Theology of the New Testament (1948-53; ET, 1952-5; 2 vols). There is a section on the theology of Paul, naturally. No, I haven't read it, I just googled it.
best, Peter Kirby |
09-29-2003, 03:53 PM | #3 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
I love google
Quote:
|
|
09-29-2003, 04:54 PM | #4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
|
|
09-29-2003, 05:36 PM | #5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,612
|
Thanks Peter and Toto,
For anyone interested, according to Christopher G. Whitsett, in JBL 119:4 (2000), p.661, Peter and Toto were bang on regarding what I need to look for-- Rudolf Bultmann, Theology of the New Testament (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1951), 1:49. The Whitsett article is a response to Bultmann, which Whitsett also informs me are far and few between, with Bultmann's interpretation being something of a standard. When did the JBL archives become accessible to non-members? They're all up but the current issue! (except for vol.119, which can be found here) If I recall correctly, this wasn't always the case. Regards, Rick |
09-29-2003, 05:55 PM | #6 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
|
Quote:
best, Peter Kirby |
|
09-29-2003, 06:21 PM | #7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,612
|
Quote:
As far as I know, that's all you get if you're a member too though, with the addition of the current issue. Unless they've changed that too. . . They need to get the sixties o/l--easily the most oft referenced in my experience. Regards, Rick |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|