FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-10-2006, 02:54 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default From the mail bag--a concerned Christian on the historicity of Jesus

Quote:
Originally Posted by A Christian
I'm a Christian whose recently become very interested in the historicity of Jesus. I'm feeling very overwhelmed by all the information I have to sort through to come to reasonable conclusions. To give you and idea of how over my head I am, I had never even heard of the Christ-myth until earlier this week. I've been reading a lot of the articles on your site christianorigins.com, but I feel terribly ill-equipped to discern biases that they might contain, as I'm far from being a New Testament scholar. I desperately want figure out the truth, but the road ahead looks awfully long. Can you recommend any short cuts to coming to objective conclusions without reading through a thousand articles which I feel somewhat intimidated by? I know that's a funny question and I may just being lazy about it. I just get the feeling that I don't have time for this search for historical truth without completely rearranging my life. I greatly appreciate your site for presenting balanced information from both sides of the debate. After reading the book by SJ Case I felt assured in by belief that Jesus existed, but I still feel a need to take seriously arguments to the contrary, since my knowledge of the subject is so rudimentary. I guess I'm just looking for some affirmation... for you to tell me that it's gonna be okay and that I'll figure it all out without having to go to Oxford and getting a degree in biblical exegesis. Thanks for your time, and for what you are doing. Out of curiosity, are you a Christian?
Is there a good and fair way to present the subject of the historicity of Jesus to your average intelligent individual, so they can come to a rational decision on their own?

kind regards,
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 12-10-2006, 03:15 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

Also, is there any book by a "Jesus agnostic" exploring the possible existence of Jesus? I don't think Robert Price counts here.

kind regards,
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 12-10-2006, 03:16 AM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

We have had some brilliant summaries here - not sure how to find them and collate them!
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 12-10-2006, 03:18 AM   #4
WCH
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,290
Default

I'd just summarize the evidence in favour and point out that it's kind of shoddy but not so shoddy as to be conclusive one way or the other. In short...

Mark: probably written around 68-70 AD.
Luke: probably written around 85
Matthew: could be anywhere from 80-100
John: 90-100, probably

Then point out that not a single Bible author even claims to have met Jesus. Matthew, Mark and John do not self identify and were most certainly not the Matthew, Mark and John in the story. Luke does self identify, but he freely admits that everything he knows is from hearsay and he didn't meet Jesus personally. Paul claims to have met Jesus in a dream only, never while living. The only extrabiblical reference that isn't commonly accepted to be faked is Josephus, and that's also a good deal after the actual events and also by a man who didn't meet Jesus personally.

So there you have it -- everything we know about Jesus was written several decades after his death by people who didn't meet him. Not very convincing.
WCH is offline  
Old 12-10-2006, 03:21 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

I think most people tend to assume he existed, and so are not troubled until they start seeing some evidence against. Besides, claims to have exhausted a search for a category of evidence are always suspect.

kind regards,
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 12-10-2006, 07:59 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Kirby View Post
Is there a good and fair way to present the subject of the historicity of Jesus to your average intelligent individual, so they can come to a rational decision on their own?

kind regards,
Peter Kirby
Yeah, I do so in my presentation:

http://www.rationalrevolution.net/ar...ristianity.htm

I'm working on a written article now along the same lines. Should be done in about 3 weeks.
Malachi151 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:46 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.