Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-28-2008, 08:47 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California
Posts: 748
|
1st Mention of Acts in Xian Lit.?
Does anyone know who the first Christian writer is who quotes or mentions by name the Book of Acts?
I often hear the argument from Christians that the gospels should be dated early because the abrupt ending of Acts seems to imply that it was written before the death of Paul (meaning that at least Luke had to have been written before that time and probably the other gospels as well). Yet, why do no early writers seem to be aware of its existence? Or are they? Thanks |
02-28-2008, 10:09 PM | #2 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
Justin Martyr in his extant writings, around the middle of the 2nd century, never mentioned Acts of the Apostles, Paul, or letters to any of the Churches. |
|
02-28-2008, 10:17 PM | #3 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California
Posts: 748
|
Quote:
|
||
02-29-2008, 12:09 AM | #4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,397
|
Maybe Irenaeus was just plugging his own book...
|
02-29-2008, 05:50 AM | #5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
|
Irenaeus is the earliest, to my knowledge, who can be securely dated. Within a span of about 20-25 years we have Irenaeus, the Muratorian canon, Clement of Alexandria, Hippolytus, and Tertullian.
We also have the anti-Marcionite prologues, but their date is uncertain. Shortly after Tertullian we have Origen. Ben. |
02-29-2008, 06:04 AM | #6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
|
|
02-29-2008, 06:16 AM | #7 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bristol' England
Posts: 2,678
|
How do they know it's 99%?
|
02-29-2008, 08:07 AM | #8 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,397
|
It sounds more authoritative than saying 1% were lost...
|
02-29-2008, 07:59 PM | #9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
|
Do we actually have the writings of Irenaeus, the Muratorian canon, Clement of Alexandria, Hippolytus, Tertullian, and Origen? or are we only being fed with claimed "quotations" from their works by a much later church writer of questionable integrity and motives?
Can anyone produce the independent writings of these "sources", without having culled them from the claims found in a 4th century writers works? Perhaps 99%, were "lost", because only 1% of those writings were ever actually originated with the authors that they were ascribed to? |
02-29-2008, 09:16 PM | #10 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
|
Whaaaaaat? Evey one of those works exists either intact or damn close to intact. The writers whose works are known from fragments (usually quotes in later authors) are the likes of Papias, Hegesippus, and Julius Africanus.
DCH Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|