Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-30-2006, 05:21 AM | #1 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Beautiful Downtown Tacoma
Posts: 370
|
Ending of Acts
It maybe just me, but has there been any speculation of Acts having a missing ending? It seems to me that the ending is, well, kind of abrupt?
|
07-30-2006, 11:04 AM | #2 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
From Peter Kirby's fabulous website:
Quote:
|
|
07-30-2006, 12:47 PM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California
Posts: 748
|
Quote:
|
|
07-31-2006, 10:47 AM | #4 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
|
Quote:
IE they seem to have been widely regarded as martyrs by 100 CE or slightly after, which is less than 50 years after their deaths. Andrew Criddle |
|
07-31-2006, 03:44 PM | #5 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 412
|
The abrupt ending of Acts tells me two things. 1) If the Bible is a made up book intended to tell the false story of a false Messiah and His followers then Acts being an unfinished work makes no logical sense. 2) It tells me that the book of acts is still a work in progress continuing to this very day. Acts will end when Christ's church ends.
|
07-31-2006, 04:26 PM | #6 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Acts does not end abruptly. It ends when Paul goes through his adventures and gets to Rome and starts preaching to the Romans, which completes "Luke's" pattern of the Gospel of Luke when Jesus starts in Galilee and ends in Jerusalem, and Acts, where Paul starts in Jerusalem and ends in Rome. As a literary creation, it is complete.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|