MollyMac

QoS: :notworthy

wufongtan: :down: Must try harder!

wufongtan

I don't want you to start thinking that you're wasting your time. even though i don't know what you would be wasting your time doing. (maybe you should stop worrying about my paragrphaps and make sure your own mini"novels" are coherent.) :huh: And yes i think you are insecure. just as homophobe is or a xenophobe, that fact is quiet clear.
I don't know if any educated free thinking person would call what you responded with a "reply". More like a spoiled child having a tantrum..
and no. i don't think what i presented was original. just as anything that you people post isn't. :thumbs:

wufongtan

"fictitious creatures exist and have some kind of role to play in the world. "
How do you know that they don't excist. and yes if the majority believe that they should live by those rules, then thats the way it has to be. And what allows them to do this isn't god.. but a little thing called democracy. don't like it move to china, they have a nice atheist goverment there.

"Not to mention that he should submit his life to these fictional creatures, or suffer unimaginably for not doing so."
who in your or my countries has ever been forced to church..? or who in your or in my country has ever been tortured for not going to church or for not believing in god...? Last i heard noone has been dragged away from their house in the middle of the night in your or my country. because they weren't a believer.
really you need to either seek psychiatric help or stop being a drama queen.

""Perhaps he'd like to be able to pull them(or even just one or two) out of fantasy-land, and into reality" Perhaps he justs wants a chance to have an equal expression of his opinion, such as that given to the "munchkin-believers".
refer to my above statement as to whom needs to stop living in a fantasy world. and again stop being a drama queen, noone stops you from doing or saying as you wish.
"Or perhaps its the "munchkin-believers" who are the insecure ones, and cannot bear having their unsubstantiated beliefs questioned.

More to the point here, though, would be why would a "munchkin-believer" go to "munchinphobe" website, where the "munchinphobes" gather to mind their own business with like-minded folks?

what is this reverse psychology 101?

Queen of Swords

But you seem so much more at home with incoherence and ludicrous claims.

Coming from someone who went to a non-believer forum to tell a transparent story about some non-existent "friend", that's pretty hypocritical. But then again, what can one expect from proselytizers?

Or an atheophobe, someone who seems to resent and fear those who lack a belief in god.

Only to you. But I'm sure that's not the first time you've been in a minority of one.

I don't know if you know any educated free thinking person, so how can you guess how they might react?

Somewhere, on another freethought board, there has just appeared a new thread. "I was wondering if anyone here would be able to anser my question. <insert smiley> i have a.. um.. friend who doesn't like it when I go to his houes and tell him what I think he thinks.. and why he's a baby to think so. <insert smiley> um.. i mean whats wrong with babies. <insert smiley> all i did was call him a spoiled child.. <insert smiley> and yet he wont admit how smart my agument was. oh well. um.. my agrument is still the prettiest one out there. <insert smiley>.. my friend is wierd. <insert smiley>"

Ooh, what a potent smackdown. I see you have mastered the art of kindergarten rhetoric.

wufongtan

"Only if you'll answer mine : have you stopped beating your children yet?"
well i haven't any kids to beat.. sorry i couldn't answer that one. even though i have no idea as to why you was asking..[i](Probably trying to get some idea as to when she should abusing hers me thinks) [i].

"You mean that people who believe in these imaginary things spend hours on end online, arguing with poor innocent non-munchin believers?"
1) I wouldn't know im not as ignorant as some to assume what a whole group of people think..2) I wouldn't know about that either. but if they did, it still wouldn't be as pathetic as they actually believe in the subject matter at hand.
"Depends. Did they try to get their belief into classrooms, courtrooms and the public square? If so, they hurt not only him but people everywhere who don't share their belief and who live in a free country."
Where do live ......china..or perhaps saudi arabia perhaps. Noone forces anyone to do anything like that.
School children don't have to pray, courts have passed that law, so that voids your statement that religion rules the courts or the schools. and as far as a public square goes. thats what they are there for aren't they? for people to say what they believe in, or do you only want people talking about what you believe in?...and you know noone is hurt by anybody for their beliefs.
"If he was your friend, paranoia seems justified."
no it doesn't. But i will recomend he doesn't come to this site as it will develop into full blown schizophrenia.
"Feel free to produce even the smallest bit of evidence that your "grand munchin" does exist; the burden of proof is on you. By the way, was that the only name that came to mind? Next time you need to write an elaborate yet transparent little hypothetical scenario, you let me know and I'll make up a better name for your imaginary god."
who claimed he excisted. as far as i see it, you're the one who made the claim first so the prove of burden falls on your shoulders.
"Yes, yes, if only your "friend" was a lemming and just followed the herd into the sea."
No No, i said he ISN"T a believer, thats one of the reason as to whats wrong him..

wufongtan

sit on it posty.. :thumbs:

wufongtan

please feel free to answer my post , but please try and make sence.
Again the paranoia here is just amazing, the anger at which you people reply to a thread that makes you question anything but god, indicates the insecurities you people have. From what i have gathed here, this place is full of people who live in constant fear of being dragged away in the middle of the night by some roaming "god squad".

Queen of Swords

That's OK, I'm sure you'll find something to beat.

No idea at all? Perhaps you should pray for illumination.

I think you've missed out a verb there, making your sentence quite unclear. Have you considered a good grammar check program?

Man. Such inaccuracy in just two words.

You mean you just assume what your friend thinks, and why he thinks it, and what's going to happen to him? But isn't your friend a fictitious representative of a "whole group of people"? So you are assuming what a whole group of people think.

So you're saying it's pathetic to have a belief in a god? Well, if you say so.

Of course they do. And not in "china" or "saudi arabia" either.

Yes, they do. And judging from your posts, one could argue that such time could be better spent in English class.

If courts are passing pro-religious laws, that means religion rules them. Claim unvoided. Please try again.

If I did, that would make me a fundamentalist.

Isn't that lovely? And tomorrow in Magic Marshmallow World, candy will rain from the sky.

And then he will hear voices in his head. And then he might believe in a god. Or a munchin. Or a munchin god. And then the two of you will be bestest buddies again. So what's the problem?

What is "excisting"?

What claim would this be?

I'm sure you'd like that, but unfortunately for you, the burden of proof is still on the people claiming that god -- oops, what's that silly word, munchins - exist.

You mean he'd be an even worse person if he was a believer? The mind boggles.

ju'iblex

I love irony, my favourite form of humour.

Good thing nobody asked for your opinion then, although it sounds tremendously like you'd formed it before you even knew this place existed.

Queen of Swords

Could you also encourage me to breathe?

When you do.

The projection isn't too bad either.

I rather like the misuse of prepositions here, actually. It sounds as though the anger's on your side, which is more than likely, and we're just replying to it.

Which thread would that be? Because yours didn't make me question anything but your motives in posting here.

Next up, wufongtan will provide a detailed analysis of our sex drives and how they relate to repressed versions of the Oedipus complex, resulting in prolonged oral fixation. Stay tuned.

Oh, my word, I think you're right. The "god squad" has already gotten to your smilies!