Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Agnostic Theist · 08-04-2005, 05:39 AM

Well, they can't see our Elsewhere forum and I can't see their Flame Wars forum

So please post here what is said there

Plognark · 08-04-2005, 05:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lestat

The idea of this topic, is to keep an eye on what happens over at the Internet Infidels message board. So post links to topics, comments, etc that you find dumb, amusing, irrational, or anything else that is negative. And then comment, refute or just ridicule what is poted there.

I felt it is only fair to return the favor since they like to insult and ridicule us a lot and everyonce in a while send some of their troops this way.

Anyway, athread that caught my eye.

Sinner as compared to nig-ger.
http://www.iidb.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=132044

Some of the posters there equates the word "Sinner" with nig-ger and considers it to be racist.

The thread to end all threads...
http://www.iidb.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=132395

Some nutcase starts a topic to write a book that is "far superior to The Bible" and feels that the posters there have the mind power to do it.

Well that is it for now, post anything you like from there or just comment about what I posted.

and later:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Melz

So the II retard who said this:

"Different ideas, eh! It's the most f*cking stupid argument for teaching anything. Leave it up to Bush to use it."

does not believe in teaching different ideas in school? That sums up the liberal position completely. As soon as we present children with different ideas and allow some free thought, they may choose to rebel against liberalism. And that would be a bad bad thing to these twits. Now I get it.

and my favorite person in the whole wide world, Nutrider99:

Quote:

I have no problem with children being exposed to the story of evolution, so long as it is in the appropriate class and not a science class. Science should be about the study of the world as it is and about what is known, not the arrangement of fossiles in some make-believe timeline in an attempt to show universal commonality. Likewise, intelligent design, the ultimate theory of the moderate undecided, should not be taught as anything other than a theory and should not be afforded the status of fact.

As for the Infidel Idiots, they all seem to resemble the evil spawn of al gore.

That's about as far as it's gone so far.

Agnostic Theist · 08-04-2005, 06:25 AM

Did Al Gore have any spawn?

Haener · 08-04-2005, 06:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Plognark

Quote:

Originally Posted by Originally Posted by Melz

So the II retard who said this:

"Different ideas, eh! It's the most f*cking stupid argument for teaching anything. Leave it up to Bush to use it."

does not believe in teaching different ideas in school? That sums up the liberal position completely. As soon as we present children with different ideas and allow some free thought, they may choose to rebel against liberalism. And that would be a bad bad thing to these twits. Now I get it.

That's me, that's me :jump: :jump: I'm the retard!

Well, I must admit that reading it just like that one sentence then it does sound pretty stupid. I've never actually understood the power of quoting out of context till someone used it against me.

Of course, I was replying to remarks made by Bush and the term 'different ideas' applies to different ideas in high school science classes which I certainly do not support teaching. If children are so interested in scientific controversies they should go to college and study it there. In high school those ideas which most scientist agree to should be taught.

It's like the 'Darwin was a racist because he talked about favored races'-argument.

I guess signing up at freeconservatives.com with my username is out of the question. Shame, I would like to see this flamewar section. I'm sure they have spies as well lurking around here in ~E~ :sneaky: reporting on our activity so DoctorDoom, if you're reading this, you scare me.

And it's not only the fact that a grown up man uses such a childish avatar.

Agnostic Theist · 08-04-2005, 09:34 AM

From dickhead doom

Re: The last person to post in this thread wins!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I shall allow them to be comforted by the illusion that they have won, but in fact, I have done a temporal displacement and have already posted the final response. My post is invisible, inasmuch as it is time-shifted approximately π² seconds into the future. The temporal offset is of course constant, and is always π² seconds beyond every real-time added post.

This is comparable to the bookend that is always the terminus, no matter how many books are added. Therefore, my post is by definition the last post. The victory is MINE!

So there! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA *ack cough*

Did it never occur to this fuckwit to just lock the thread instead of playing a cliched and infantile game?

Haener · 08-04-2005, 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Agnostic Theist

From dickhead doom

Did it never occur to this fuckwit to just lock the thread instead of playing a cliched and infantile game?

Didn't we determine along the line somewhere that dr. doomy was in his fifties? This guy is acting disturbingly infantile.

Agnostic Theist · 08-04-2005, 10:08 AM

True.

FUCKING CONSERVATIVES!

Why can't they just accept that they're wrong? I mean, 'only children shall enter heaven' maybe, but what the fuck is he on?!

Haener · 08-04-2005, 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Agnostic Theist

<snip>I mean, 'only children shall enter heaven' maybe, but what the fuck is he on?!

Interesting hypothesis. Dr.doomy is acting this infantile to get into heaven. Well, he surely is on the right track. If there is no original sin (what would dr.doom think about that?) then his shown lack of sanity should really secure his ticket with Petrus.

Haener · 08-05-2005, 05:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Haener

That's me, that's me :jump: :jump: I'm the retard!

This is were I would have expected at least 5 members or so to jump in and post something like:

Quote:

You're not the retard. They are!!

Ah well...

Plognark · 08-05-2005, 08:20 AM

Being called a retard is pretty mild for them, actually. I've been flamed worse by Doomy

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

08-04-2005, 05:39 AM	#481
Agnostic Theist Veteran Member Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: UK Posts: 4,822	Well, they can't see our Elsewhere forum and I can't see their Flame Wars forum So please post here what is said there

08-04-2005, 06:25 AM	#483
Agnostic Theist Veteran Member Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: UK Posts: 4,822	Did Al Gore have any spawn?

08-04-2005, 09:34 AM	#485
Agnostic Theist Veteran Member Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: UK Posts: 4,822	From dickhead doom Re: The last person to post in this thread wins! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I shall allow them to be comforted by the illusion that they have won, but in fact, I have done a temporal displacement and have already posted the final response. My post is invisible, inasmuch as it is time-shifted approximately π² seconds into the future. The temporal offset is of course constant, and is always π² seconds beyond every real-time added post. This is comparable to the bookend that is always the terminus, no matter how many books are added. Therefore, my post is by definition the last post. The victory is MINE! So there! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ack cough Did it never occur to this fuckwit to just lock the thread instead of playing a cliched and infantile game?

08-04-2005, 10:08 AM	#487
Agnostic Theist Veteran Member Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: UK Posts: 4,822	True. FUCKING CONSERVATIVES! Why can't they just accept that they're wrong? I mean, 'only children shall enter heaven' maybe, but what the fuck is he on?!

08-05-2005, 08:20 AM	#490
Plognark Contributor Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 14,952	Being called a retard is pretty mild for them, actually. I've been flamed worse by Doomy

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.