FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Science & Skepticism > Evolution/Creation
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-23-2008, 03:44 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 28
Default Mecca first land on Earth?!

This is probably a ridiculous question, but a popular Muslim geologist on Youtube claims that Mecca is the first raised land on Earth (He also claims that it's the center of Earth AND the universe, but let's not go there). He claims that Earth was once 100% covered in oceans, and by volcanic eruptions, the land was raised, and the first land to raise is that of Mecca.

Was ancient Earth at any point completely covered with oceans? What's the most ancient land, if there is such a thing? Here is the subtitled Youtube video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXXaxpVi74Y

I was trying to answer the first question by reading ancient history of earth, A bit of research showed that oceans formed after the earth's temperature settled down a bit, but it never said anything about water covering ALL Earth (that is, everything is submerged) or if there was always a raised land/continent since the beginning of its formation.
KNRO is offline  
Old 09-23-2008, 03:54 PM   #2
Moderator - Evolution/Creation
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 5,710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KNRO View Post
This is probably a ridiculous question, but a popular Muslim geologist on Youtube claims that Mecca is the first raised land on Earth (He also claims that it's the center of Earth AND the universe, but let's not go there). He claims that Earth was once 100% covered in oceans, and by volcanic eruptions, the land was raised, and the first land to raise is that of Mecca.

Was ancient Earth at any point completely covered with oceans? What's the most ancient land, if there is such a thing? Here is the subtitled Youtube video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXXaxpVi74Y

I was trying to answer the first question by reading ancient history of earth, A bit of research showed that oceans formed after the earth's temperature settled down a bit, but it never said anything about water covering ALL Earth (that is, everything is submerged) or if there was always a raised land/continent since the beginning of its formation.
Well there is one hypothesis that claims the Earth was completely covered in water (in the form of ice) at one point. It's called the Snowball Earth Hypothesis. I'm not sure about liquid water. Either way, I'd like to see the evidence that Mecca was the first land mass - I'm pretty sure he has none.
J842P is offline  
Old 09-23-2008, 05:13 PM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

I think you might get a better discussion in either the Evolution-Creationism forum or Science and Skepticism. Let me ask around.
Toto is offline  
Old 09-25-2008, 07:46 AM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Incoming Fatwa on the Saudi Geological Survey!

http://www.sgs.org.sa/index.cfm?sec=16&page


There is some old stuff - 3 billion years - but I though the oldest are in Australia and Canada - ex British so therefore our gods are right!

Quote:
The oldest rock or rocks on Earth, as an aggregate of minerals, are from the Archean Eon and are only partially exposed on the surface.[1]
There is some controversy about the oldest rocks based on the oldest dated mineral zircon. Some of the oldest surface rock can be found in the Canadian Shield, Australia, Africa and in other more specific places around the world. The ages of these felsic rocks are generally between 2.5 and 3.8 billion Earth years. The approximate ages have a margin of error of millions of Earth years.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oldest_rock
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 09-25-2008, 11:34 AM   #5
Obsessed Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 61,538
Default

Oldest bedrock found in Canada
premjan is offline  
Old 09-26-2008, 11:58 PM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Moving to Evolution-Creationism
Toto is offline  
Old 09-27-2008, 12:26 AM   #7
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Searching for reality on the long and winding road
Posts: 12,976
Default

I don't really understand why you are bothering to research those claims unless you think that maybe they could be true. Those claims are no different than the claims you hear from fundamentalist Christian creationists just a different religion's view. There is nothing you can post in response that will have a chance of changing their belief.
skepticalbip is offline  
Old 09-27-2008, 07:52 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southeastern US
Posts: 6,776
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skepticalbip View Post
I don't really understand why you are bothering to research those claims unless you think that maybe they could be true. Those claims are no different than the claims you hear from fundamentalist Christian creationists just a different religion's view. There is nothing you can post in response that will have a chance of changing their belief.
Probably true but at least we'll have evidence should we encounter such ridiculous claims in rl and thereby be able to hold our own in an argument.
Civil1z@tion is offline  
Old 09-27-2008, 10:10 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the west
Posts: 3,295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Civil1z@tion View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by skepticalbip View Post
I don't really understand why you are bothering to research those claims unless you think that maybe they could be true. Those claims are no different than the claims you hear from fundamentalist Christian creationists just a different religion's view. There is nothing you can post in response that will have a chance of changing their belief.
Probably true but at least we'll have evidence should we encounter such ridiculous claims in rl and thereby be able to hold our own in an argument.
But you can't because they won't listen. Instead, ask them for actual proof. They're making the claim, and it's on them to prove it. Otherwise you're just running around like their dog after a stick; no matter how many times you fetch it, they just throw it again. Sometimes they throw a new one, sometimes they throw two, or six, at a time. You'll never keep up. Don't be a dog, or at least surprise them by being a talking, thoughtful dog who watches them throw the stick and asks "Where's the reasoning behind that piece of performace art?"
anthrosciguy is offline  
Old 09-27-2008, 12:48 PM   #10
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Egypt
Posts: 307
Default

Quote:
He also claims that it's the center of Earth AND the universe, but let's not go there).
the Hadith is saying " the KAABA" was khashaa not mecca. I mean even the most traditionalist muslims understand that the Kaaba was built , not came out from water.
Regallo is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:53 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.