Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
08-03-2005, 01:34 PM | #1 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
|
Plutarch and Preexistence of Romulus
Richard Carrier has suggested in other threads that Romulus by Plutarch is an example of belief in a preexistent divine being descending to earth and then reascending to heaven. This view has been held by other scholars and IMO it is a misunderstanding of Plutarch.
The context in Plutarch is that after Romulus' mysterious disappearance he is believed either taken up to the Gods or killed and dismembered by the Senators. A Patrician Julius Proculus comes forward and declares on oath that Quote:
a/ Although other writers have similar accounts, the idea of Romulus not only ascending to heaven but also first descending to Earth is IIUC only found here. b/ The idea of Romulus descending from heaven seems unrelated to anything else in Plutarch's narrative. c/ Plutarch does not say that Romulus descended from heaven he only claims that Proculus claimed to have a vision in which Romulus claimed to have descended from heaven. d/ this claim is preceded by an account of allegations accusing the patricians 'as men that persuaded the people to believe ridiculous tales, when they themselves were the murderers of the king.' e/ it is followed by a discussion by Plutarch of other stories about disappearing bodies ending with Plutarch's comment that Quote:
Andrew Criddle |
||
08-03-2005, 03:00 PM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
Moreover, coming from the Gods does not infer descending from the sky. Actually, I would take that as all are from the Gods aka the Gods made us, nothing like assumption.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|