FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-17-2007, 07:48 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
Default Wright spins and spins

http://www.ntwrightpage.com/Wright_Faraday.htm 'Can a Scientist Believe in the Resurrection', by NT Wright, Bishop of Durham

'The first modification is that there is virtually no spectrum of belief within early Christianity. '

Amazing. Wright knows for a fact that early converts to Jesus-worship in Corinth scoffed at the idea of a corpse rising, and yet he can still stand up in public and deliver such a line.

'The second strange feature of the stories is better known: the presence of the women as the principal witnesses. Whether we like it or not, women were not regarded as credible witneses within the ancient world.'

John 4:39 Many of the Samaritans from that town believed in him because of the woman's testimony, "He told me everything I ever did."

The Gospellers thought that people would find women credible witnesses.

And Wright also knows that in the earliest Gospel, Mark, the women don't tell anybody.

And , of course, in Mark, the first witness to the resurrection is not a woman at all. It is a young man.

How can Wright read the Gospel of Mark where the first person at the tomb is a young man, and expect to be taken seriously when Wright tells people that the first person at the tomb was not a man?

It was a man. Just read the damned story!
Steven Carr is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:18 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.