Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-06-2013, 03:37 PM | #1 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: united states
Posts: 156
|
types and prophecies
What do people mean by types compared to prophecies? Is a type supposed to be a prophecy and can an actual prophecy be fulfilled by a type?
Kenneth Greifer |
03-06-2013, 04:27 PM | #2 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Can you give an example of this usage?
|
03-07-2013, 03:44 AM | #3 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Finland
Posts: 314
|
Quote:
Types are an insidious thing, really - it's a way for Christians to rid themselves of reading comprehension. It is essentially a way of saying that "any phrase in the OT that in isolation can be read as though something about Jesus or Christianity is a fulfillment of it, is a fulfillment we can boast about". It also has weird implications. If the "types" really are what Christians wish them to be, this implies God does not even try to communicate in order to help people understand him, but rather hides his message as deep he can. The same way typology can be used to prop up the Gospels, it can be used to support Islam or any flavor of Judaism, Christianity or even other religions. It also leads to a way of thinking about how to read texts that makes it ok to read "I didn't do it" as an admission of guilt - just look at it, "I didn't do it" contains "I did do it", hence there's an admission there!! I suspect the idea of typology have ruined many Christians' understanding of what "context" even means - ever run into Christians' saying you have to "read it in context", and then doing the exact opposite to the text? I am strongly inclined to believe this type-bullshit is one of the sources of that. They genuinely think context means "Christ". |
|
03-08-2013, 11:20 AM | #4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
|
Quote:
I'd say that prophesy consists of plain words used to make a short term prediction (directed to a king or the congregation of Judeans, whatever). It is later that someone might interpret to posess a secondary meaning relevant to the times of the interpreter.
It is even found in this sense in Romans and Hebrews.
DCH |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
03-08-2013, 02:38 PM | #5 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: united states
Posts: 156
|
I read an article that said that Isaiah 7:14 was a prophecy, but the writer said it was a type also. He didn't explain what he meant by that. I guess he was saying it was about someone in Ahaz' time, but also about someone at a later time also.
|
03-08-2013, 02:50 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 758
|
Actually Isaiah 7:14 is a prophesy. It is a conditional one having nothing to do with Jesus. Isaiah is telling King Ahaz what will happen if Ahaz turns from his evil ways and returns to God. Ahaz doesn't and is vanquished.
All one needs to do to know that it has nothing to do with Jesus is read it in full context. Steve |
03-08-2013, 03:21 PM | #7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,619
|
Quote:
NABRE Isaiah 7:14 Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign. Look, the young woman is with child and shall bear a son, and shall name him Immanuel. How is Isa 7:14 a prophecy? |
|
03-08-2013, 04:19 PM | #8 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Finland
Posts: 314
|
Quote:
|
||
03-08-2013, 04:23 PM | #9 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
|
Quote:
And that the child will be named Immanuel. Neither which has evidently yet happened when the statement is made. But it doesn't say anything about Jezuz. |
|
03-09-2013, 05:20 AM | #10 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,619
|
Quote:
Can an actual prophecy be fulfilled by a type? Yes. It depends on the rules governing admissible evidence and all that. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|