FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-16-2007, 09:26 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
Default What evidence could irrefutably prove that Jesus never existed?

What would be the nail in the coffin for Jesus historicity?

I was thinking about this, and I think that the thing that would certainly do the most damage would be irrefutable evidence of writings about "Jesus Christ" from before the 1st century CE.

Maybe such things don't exist, but this is pretty much the only thing I can think of that would really seal the case.

Others could argue that even if this were found people might argue that "Jesus" still existed, but the Gospels just go the story wrong, but I think this would be a pretty lethal blow.

Is there anything else anyone can think of?
Malachi151 is offline  
Old 01-16-2007, 10:20 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA, Missouri
Posts: 3,070
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malachi151 View Post
What would be the nail in the coffin for Jesus historicity?

I was thinking about this, and I think that the thing that would certainly do the most damage would be irrefutable evidence of writings about "Jesus Christ" from before the 1st century CE.

Maybe such things don't exist, but this is pretty much the only thing I can think of that would really seal the case.

Others could argue that even if this were found people might argue that "Jesus" still existed, but the Gospels just go the story wrong, but I think this would be a pretty lethal blow.

Is there anything else anyone can think of?

If Jesus began as a mythical being, we have to ask "what kind of mythical being"?

IF the answer is "one that is portrayed as having lived on earth", then some pretty good proof that this being was mythical (ie, didn't really live on earth) might be the following:

1. Blatant misrepresentations of the culture and environment in which he is placed.
2. A lack of evidence (documents, archeology) reasonably expected given the description of him.
3. Evidence of either early understanding that such a character was understood or believed to have been mythical by some.


IF the mythical being was first represented as a god in the heavens, then pretty good proof would be:

1. A blatant lack of information about and evidence for earthly activities.
2. Concurrent in time with #1, a description of activities in the heavens.
3. Evidence of early understanding that such a character only resided in the heavens.

That's all I can think of off the top of my head.

ted
TedM is offline  
Old 01-16-2007, 10:29 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Nazareth
Posts: 2,357
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malachi151 View Post
What evidence could irrefutably prove that Jesus never existed?
JW:
A Signed confession from Jesus that he/He/she/they/it is Mythical or at least a Transubstantiation Revelation to Paul.



Joseph

http://www.errancywiki.com/index.php/Main_Page
JoeWallack is offline  
Old 01-16-2007, 10:57 AM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malachi151 View Post
What would be the nail in the coffin for Jesus historicity?

I was thinking about this, and I think that the thing that would certainly do the most damage would be irrefutable evidence of writings about "Jesus Christ" from before the 1st century CE.

Maybe such things don't exist, but this is pretty much the only thing I can think of that would really seal the case.

Others could argue that even if this were found people might argue that "Jesus" still existed, but the Gospels just go the story wrong, but I think this would be a pretty lethal blow.

Is there anything else anyone can think of?

I am of the opinion that the writings of Flavius Josephus, 'Wars of the Jews', 'Antiquities of the Jews' and 'The Life of Flavius Josephus' has completely destroyed the historicty of the so-called Jesus the Christ.

Josephus (b 37-100 CE) has, through silence, shown that there was no 'Jesus Movment', no new religous doctrine of the followers of Jesus the Christ challenging the Mosaic Laws, no followers of Jesus the Christ that were in constant opposition to the Pharisees, no prosecutions or persecution of followers of Jesus the Christ, no group or sect of Jesus the Christ that were miraculously raising the dead and healing all manner of diseases.

The most devastating statement to the historicity of Jesus the Christ comes from Flavius Josephus in 'The life of Flavius Josephus',

Quote:
And when I was about sixteen years old, I had a mind to make trim of the several sects that were among us. These sects are: The first is that of the Pharisees, the second that Sadducees, and the third that of the Essens, as we have frequently told you; for I thought that by this means I might choose the best, if I were once acquainted with them all;so, I contented myself with hard fare, and underwent great difficulties, and went through them all.


Nor did I content myself with these trials only; but when I was informed that one, whose name was Banos, lived in the desert, and used no other clothing than what grew on tress, and had no other food than what grew upon of its own accord, and bathed himself in cold water frequently, both by night and day, in order to preserve his chastity, I imitated him in those things and continued with him three years,

So when I had accomplished my desires, I returned back to the city, being now nineteen years old, and began to conduct myself according to the rules of the sect of the Pharisees, which is of kin to the sect of the Stoics, as the Greek call them.
These passages from FJ have contradicted the book called Acts, and have demonstrated that Flavius Josephus, in his quest for religious experiences, never heard of any phenomena, with many thosands of followers, carrying out miracles in the middle of the street, and in constant conflict with the Pharisees, the very same sect that he was a part of.

We have the Jews under oppression during the life of Flavius Josephus, yet Josephus has no interaction, no discourse, no memorable event with respect to the the followers of the Messiah.

Could it be possible that an African American historian or writer born a few years after the death of Martin Luther King, writing on the history of the African Americal Civil Rights Movement and never mention the large marches and demonstrations organised by Martin Luther King when the historian himself was a member of a Civil Rights group? I think not.

Unless some other extra-biblical writing surfaces to contradict the 'works' of Flavius Josephus, then I consider the historicity of Jesus the Christ void. Jesus the Christ cannot be placed in history, he was fabricated from imagination.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 01-16-2007, 10:59 AM   #5
Talk Freethought Staff
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Heart of the Bible Belt
Posts: 5,807
Default

Not to sound flippant, but in my opinion it would be the same kind of evidence required to prove that Santa Claus never existed. It is exceedingly difficult to prove a negative.

Contradictions in the narratives (gospels) only demonstrate inconsistencies in the stories told about Jesus. It is possible to believe George Washington existed without believing that he chucked a silver dollar across the Potomac River.

The fact that there is no cooberating evidence of the more spectacular events allegedly ascribed to Jesus's life is a bit more compelling. It is reasonable to believe that many of these types of events would have left marks in history that could be verified. Such events include the "star" that led the wise men to the baby Jesus, the slaughter of the babies by Herod, the ridiculous decree that everyone migrate to the city of their ancestors to be counted for a census (which ancestral city do you have to migrate to?!?), the large hoardes of followers, the feeding of thousands of people with only a few morsels of food, the public trial, the crucifixion, the 3 hours of total darkness, the earthquake, the zombies walking around in Jerusalem, even the empty tomb itself. It is extremely unlikely that the first followers wouldn't have enshrined that tomb and marked it for all time. Yet none of these, or any number of other spectacular events left even the slightest trace of evidence that they happened.

Yet even in the face of all this, it is irresponsible to conclude that there never was a man behind the legends. It is only possible to debunk some (most) of the claims. Even if pre-1st century documents describing Jesus of Nazareth were to somehow be found it would only indicate that the dating of his life was in error. Apologists would quickly find other Herods, Pilates, etc., to account for the egregious anachronisms.

JMHO
Atheos is offline  
Old 01-16-2007, 11:09 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
Default

aa5874: Good point, and thanks for bringing this passage, up, but how then do we explain Paul and Nero?

I think that the explanation here may be that "Christianity" developed in the diaspora and never had any roots in the area around Judea, the Judean roots just being a fabrication of the myth.
Malachi151 is offline  
Old 01-16-2007, 12:34 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Vacuosity
Posts: 1,063
Default

How about an authentic letter from the author of 'GMark' alluding to the fact that it was all purely allegorical. And maybe an admonition to not take it too seriously?
Sphincterboy is offline  
Old 01-16-2007, 01:34 PM   #8
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: BFE
Posts: 416
Default

How about if the gospel writers had included, in their accounts, outright physically impossible elements, and then attempted to pass them off as genuine events?

Oh, wait a minute. We already have those.

Nevermind.

Mythra is offline  
Old 01-16-2007, 05:37 PM   #9
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Washington
Posts: 35
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malachi151 View Post
What would be the nail in the coffin for Jesus historicity?
Nothing, really. Any evidence could have a logical counter-argument; this is why it's so difficult to demonstrate a negative.

Quote:
I was thinking about this, and I think that the thing that would certainly do the most damage would be irrefutable evidence of writings about "Jesus Christ" from before the 1st century CE.
But then one could argue that it's a different one, just as people frequently argue that "Chrestus" is not necessarily Jesus Christ. Similarly, one could argue that the basic events of the Bible occurred, just with the wrong dates. Or, if one is spiritually inclined, one could say it is evidence that Jesus was prophetically foreshadowed.

See what I mean?

Quote:
Maybe such things don't exist, but this is pretty much the only thing I can think of that would really seal the case.

Others could argue that even if this were found people might argue that "Jesus" still existed, but the Gospels just go the story wrong, but I think this would be a pretty lethal blow.

Is there anything else anyone can think of?
I don't think so; we already have many Christians who reject most of the Bible: I don't see why "having the dates different" would do much to them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TedM View Post
If Jesus began as a mythical being, we have to ask "what kind of mythical being"?

IF the answer is "one that is portrayed as having lived on earth", then some pretty good proof that this being was mythical (ie, didn't really live on earth) might be the following:

1. Blatant misrepresentations of the culture and environment in which he is placed.
Again, certainly not proof that he didn't exist. This is, however, evidence that the text in question is in error.

Quote:
2. A lack of evidence (documents, archeology) reasonably expected given the description of him.
What evidence would we expect given the description of him?

The basic things generally ascribed to Jesus are relatively common; a carpenter leading a millennialist cult with a few thousand (realistically) followers, who was crucified after stirring controversy and the like.

Now, since we're talking about questioning whether Jesus existed at all, I don't think it's too unreasonable for you to say that the Gospels may have been exaggerated in some respects (like the "many thousands of followers" in the Acts) and others may have been left out. This leaves us with, in all respects, a fairly minor figure.

Now, the relevant texts surviving from within a century of Christ are universally of three types;

- General histories, such as those of Tacitus and Josephus
- Fragmentary and incomplete Roman records, with little rhyme or reason for having survived
- Apologetic works by Christian authors

Now, of these, only the third indisputably contains mention of Jesus, with the first type possibly supporting Jesus' historicity (but that is another thread). The second, while not mentioning Jesus, does not mention very much at all. And since I know that most of you reject the apologetic works offhand, we're left with the question "why don't the other two mention Jesus?"

Again, I don't think the lack of surviving Roman records mentioning Jesus is substantial evidence for or against the existence of Jesus, because these records prove precious little. And I don't think there is a compelling reason for why they should have been preserved; a record saying "Jesus the heretic was crucified" is not terribly significant theologically, nor a good place to invest precious time compared to other works.

Now, the fact that no histories unambiguously reference Jesus is a problem, but this is not proof that Jesus does not exist; it is simply evidence that if he did exist, he was not viewed as significant enough to be included. So, I think the question that really has to be asked is "How significant was Jesus, and how significant would he need to be for inclusion?"

Quote:
3. Evidence of either early understanding that such a character was understood or believed to have been mythical by some.
Why would this be proof? All it proves is that some did not believe him to have existed. Now, if it was demonstrated that a majority believed him to be allegorical there would be a case to be made, but I don't think that a small minority believing this would be proof any more than the small groups believing in Gnostic Christianity is proof that the original Christianity was Gnostic.

Quote:
IF the mythical being was first represented as a god in the heavens, then pretty good proof would be:

1. A blatant lack of information about and evidence for earthly activities.
2. Concurrent in time with #1, a description of activities in the heavens.
3. Evidence of early understanding that such a character only resided in the heavens.
Again, lack of evidence does not prove anything; it proves that there is no evidence.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeWallack View Post
A Signed confession from Jesus that he/He/she/they/it is Mythical or at least a Transubstantiation Revelation to Paul.
Is this a joke? If Jesus was doing anything, he must be something, which would mean that he exists in some form.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
I am of the opinion that the writings of Flavius Josephus, 'Wars of the Jews', 'Antiquities of the Jews' and 'The Life of Flavius Josephus' has completely destroyed the historicty of the so-called Jesus the Christ.
*yawn*

Quote:
Josephus (b 37-100 CE) has, through silence, shown that there was no 'Jesus Movment',
Or, at least, that it was sufficiently minor to not warrant mention.

Quote:
no new religous doctrine of the followers of Jesus the Christ challenging the Mosaic Laws,
Or, at least, that it was sufficiently minor to not warrant mention.

Quote:
no followers of Jesus the Christ that were in constant opposition to the Pharisees,
Or, at least, that it was sufficiently minor to not warrant mention.

Quote:
no prosecutions or persecution of followers of Jesus the Christ,
Or, at least, that it was sufficiently minor to not warrant mention.

Quote:
no group or sect of Jesus the Christ that were miraculously raising the dead and healing all manner of diseases.
Or, at least, that it was sufficiently minor to not warrant mention.

Quote:
The most devastating statement to the historicity of Jesus the Christ comes from Flavius Josephus in 'The life of Flavius Josephus',
He doesn't mention the Imperial Cult, either.

I once read a theory that Banos was a Christian ; I mean, I don't put much credence in it. But it's out there.

Quote:
These passages from FJ have contradicted the book called Acts, and have demonstrated that Flavius Josephus, in his quest for religious experiences, never heard of any phenomena, with many thosands of followers, carrying out miracles in the middle of the street, and in constant conflict with the Pharisees, the very same sect that he was a part of.
Nor, for that matter, does he mention what are assuredly many other Messianic cults in the region, nor the mystery religions we can find. This does not mean that they didn't exist.

Quote:
We have the Jews under oppression during the life of Flavius Josephus, yet Josephus has no interaction, no discourse, no memorable event with respect to the the followers of the Messiah. Could it be possible that an African American historian or writer born a few years after the death of Martin Luther King, writing on the history of the African Americal Civil Rights Movement and never mention the large marches and demonstrations organised by Martin Luther King when the historian himself was a member of a Civil Rights group? I think not.
This is a completely false analogy, for several reasons;

- Jesus was not leader of the "anti-Roman movement"
- Jesus was not followed by the vast majority in that movement
- Jesus' aim was not directly the overthrow of Rome

A more fair analogy would be "Is it possible that an African-American historian or writer born a few years after the founding of the Black Panthers, writing on the history of the African American Civil Rights Movement, never mentions the Black Panthers' actions?" The answer is yes; I've read such a history.

Quote:
Unless some other extra-biblical writing surfaces to contradict the 'works' of Flavius Josephus, then I consider the historicity of Jesus the Christ void. Jesus the Christ cannot be placed in history, he was fabricated from imagination.
I don't think this is at all fair. You can't say that a figure is definitively fake simply because you don't have any contemporary evidence for him; you need some sort of evidence that he is fake. Otherwise, you're committing a logical fallacy; the fact that something has not been proven does not make it automatically false.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atheos View Post
Not to sound flippant, but in my opinion it would be the same kind of evidence required to prove that Santa Claus never existed. It is exceedingly difficult to prove a negative.

Contradictions in the narratives (gospels) only demonstrate inconsistencies in the stories told about Jesus. It is possible to believe George Washington existed without believing that he chucked a silver dollar across the Potomac River.
Et tu, brute?

Wait, Caesar is also said to have stated "kai su, teknon?" And also, "tu quoque, fili mi?"

Caesar must be false.

Moral: Contradictions are not proof that none are true.

Quote:
The fact that there is no cooberating evidence of the more spectacular events allegedly ascribed to Jesus's life is a bit more compelling.
You'd think, but not a lot of anything survived.

Quote:
It is reasonable to believe that many of these types of events would have left marks in history that could be verified. Such events include the "star" that led the wise men to the baby Jesus,
There's the speculation that it was a comet recorded by Chinese and Korean astronomers in 5 BC.

Quote:
the slaughter of the babies by Herod,
Josephus is regarded by some to have been biased toward Herod because of Nicholas of Damascus.

Quote:
the ridiculous decree that everyone migrate to the city of their ancestors to be counted for a census (which ancestral city do you have to migrate to?!?),
You mean the census mentioned by Josephus?

Quote:
the large hoardes of followers,
Exaggeration?

Quote:
the feeding of thousands of people with only a few morsels of food,
Where would this be recorded, again?

Quote:
the public trial, the crucifixion,
Who would have recorded this, again? You think Pontius Pilate would erect a monument saying I KILLED JESUS?

Quote:
the 3 hours of total darkness, the earthquake,
Not mentioned in John, though speculation includes that it was just a dust storm.

Quote:
the zombies walking around in Jerusalem,
Lazarus, you mean?

Intentionally obscured by Jesus.

Quote:
even the empty tomb itself.
Notable how to Josephus?

Quote:
It is extremely unlikely that the first followers wouldn't have enshrined that tomb and marked it for all time. Yet none of these, or any number of other spectacular events left even the slightest trace of evidence that they happened.
...the Church of the Holy Sepulchre? Which was a site of veneration until a Temple of Venus was built over it?

Quote:
Yet even in the face of all this, it is irresponsible to conclude that there never was a man behind the legends. It is only possible to debunk some (most) of the claims. Even if pre-1st century documents describing Jesus of Nazareth were to somehow be found it would only indicate that the dating of his life was in error. Apologists would quickly find other Herods, Pilates, etc., to account for the egregious anachronisms.
Thank you.
Ideologist is offline  
Old 01-16-2007, 06:01 PM   #10
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ideologist View Post
I once read a theory that Banos was a Christian ; I mean, I don't put much credence in it. But it's out there.
You could not be refering to the 'Banos' in The life of Flavius Josephus. Banos was not described as a Christian.

There are theories that Jesus the Christ was fabricated from the writings of Flavius Josephus and I am begining to put credence to those theories.
aa5874 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:02 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.