Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Mike PSS · 07-27-2007, 07:52 PM

Dave expects an overwhelming win by CM. So Dave should be happy with the results.

BWE · 07-27-2007, 09:30 PM

It's not even the slightly dark knight. Dave knows now that the consilience of science fuckers up the absolute authority of those he looks to for wisdom. He sees the sham. The difficult task of confronting the reality he is beginning to understand couldn't happen in this debate. Defeat are slightly below denees.

ck1 · 07-28-2007, 05:35 AM

How unusual is this kind of lopsided outcome for debates on this site?

mitschlag · 07-28-2007, 05:42 AM

afdave, I see two possible explanations, not mutually exclusive, for your failure:

* You didn't have a case

* You didn't present good arguments

What are your thoughts?

Satan is awaitin'

deadman_932 · 07-28-2007, 05:58 AM

Let's see...There were/are a lot of theists on Dawkins' site.

There's a lot of theists on this site.

Total for Dave in two debates: 1 "win" and 1 draw.

Total "against" AFDave : 200+ and counting

Pwnd.

Calilasseia · 07-28-2007, 06:59 AM

62-0 and climbing as I checked ...

That's 208 votes against in two debates.

If he were standing as a candidate to become a Member of Parliament here in the UK, he'd have lost his deposit. There are candidates from the Official Raving Monster Loony Party here in the UK that have had better results than this.

Jayco · 07-28-2007, 08:59 AM

I was seriously debating whether or not to click Dave for the sake of humor. Alas, I did not.

Sven · 07-28-2007, 09:35 AM

Look's like Dave (or biblethumper?) voted in the meantime.

Why didn't you make this a public poll, Occam's Aftershave?

Constant Mews · 07-28-2007, 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Calilasseia

CM might well choose not to even if he could. He might prefer the result to derive solely from others.

And indeed, I will not vote. In circumstances such as this, only an egotistical asshat would vote for himself, and only an idiot would vote for his opponent.

But I do appreciate the vote of confidence.

Constant Mews · 07-28-2007, 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWE

It's not even the slightly dark knight. Dave knows now that the consilience of science fuckers up the absolute authority of those he looks to for wisdom. He sees the sham. The difficult task of confronting the reality he is beginning to understand couldn't happen in this debate. Defeat are slightly below denees.

Does he? I still don't agree that Dave has the intellectual capacity to understand the basic problem.

View Poll Results: Who won the "Is Genesis Historically False" debate
Constant Mews won	128	97.71%
AFDave won	2	1.53%
It was a tie	1	0.76%
Voters: 131. You may not vote on this poll

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

07-27-2007, 07:52 PM	#11
Mike PSS Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Florida, USA Posts: 656	Dave expects an overwhelming win by CM. So Dave should be happy with the results.

07-27-2007, 09:30 PM	#12
BWE Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Portland, OR Posts: 624	It's not even the slightly dark knight. Dave knows now that the consilience of science fuckers up the absolute authority of those he looks to for wisdom. He sees the sham. The difficult task of confronting the reality he is beginning to understand couldn't happen in this debate. Defeat are slightly below denees.

07-28-2007, 05:35 AM	#13
ck1 Veteran Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: US East Coast Posts: 1,093	How unusual is this kind of lopsided outcome for debates on this site?

07-28-2007, 05:42 AM	#14
mitschlag Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: United States east coast Posts: 58	afdave, I see two possible explanations, not mutually exclusive, for your failure: * You didn't have a case * You didn't present good arguments What are your thoughts? Satan is awaitin'

07-28-2007, 05:58 AM	#15
deadman_932 Veteran Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Altadena, California Posts: 3,271	Let's see...There were/are a lot of theists on Dawkins' site. There's a lot of theists on this site. Total for Dave in two debates: 1 "win" and 1 draw. Total "against" AFDave : 200+ and counting Pwnd.

07-28-2007, 06:59 AM	#16
Calilasseia Veteran Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Near Liverpool, UK Posts: 1,072	62-0 and climbing as I checked ... That's 208 votes against in two debates. If he were standing as a candidate to become a Member of Parliament here in the UK, he'd have lost his deposit. There are candidates from the Official Raving Monster Loony Party here in the UK that have had better results than this.

07-28-2007, 08:59 AM	#17
Jayco Veteran Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Crystal Lake, Illinois Posts: 865	I was seriously debating whether or not to click Dave for the sake of humor. Alas, I did not.

07-28-2007, 09:35 AM	#18
Sven Contributor Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: outraged about the stiffling of free speech here Posts: 10,987	Look's like Dave (or biblethumper?) voted in the meantime. Why didn't you make this a public poll, Occam's Aftershave?

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.