FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

View Poll Results: Who won the "Is Genesis Historically False" debate
Constant Mews won 128 97.71%
AFDave won 2 1.53%
It was a tie 1 0.76%
Voters: 131. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-27-2007, 05:59 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: California
Posts: 2,215
Default Is Genesis Historically False debate poll results

The great Is Genesis Historically False debate between Constant Mews and AFDave is over. It's time to see which side won by virtue of their more persuasive arguments

Constant Mews demonstrated conclusively that Genesis is historically false.

AFDave demonstrated conclusively that Genesis is not historically false

Neither side demonstrated its case
Occam's Aftershave is offline  
Old 07-27-2007, 06:24 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Altadena, California
Posts: 3,271
Default

Good job,CM, hope you're feeling better. And Dave, you have quite a few questions waiting for you on your threads here. Hike up your skirts and sashay on down.
deadman_932 is offline  
Old 07-27-2007, 06:52 AM   #3
mung bean
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Don't listen to Deadman, Dave. We all know you can't cope with the questions and you'll only embarrass yourself if you try.
Just stick to your standard operating procedure and run away from them.
 
Old 07-27-2007, 07:10 AM   #4
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England
Posts: 135
Default

CM by a landslide: could 'CONSILIENCE!!!" become the new "VARVES!!!"?
Agenda07 is offline  
Old 07-27-2007, 03:04 PM   #5
ck1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: US East Coast
Posts: 1,093
Default

Is Dave allowed to vote?
ck1 is offline  
Old 07-27-2007, 03:06 PM   #6
mung bean
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Is CM?
 
Old 07-27-2007, 03:09 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Near Liverpool, UK
Posts: 1,072
Default

CM might well choose not to even if he could. He might prefer the result to derive solely from others.
Calilasseia is offline  
Old 07-27-2007, 03:24 PM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Washington, DC (formerly Denmark)
Posts: 3,789
Default

LOL! So far it's CM 30 : afdave 0... I see a trend.
Julian is offline  
Old 07-27-2007, 03:40 PM   #9
mung bean
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calilasseia View Post
CM might well choose not to even if he could. He might prefer the result to derive solely from others.
I can well see CM being that honourable. It would be consistent with the rest of his online behaviour.

On the other hand I have a strong suspicion that Dave would vote if able to.
 
Old 07-27-2007, 04:02 PM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,027
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calilasseia View Post
CM might well choose not to even if he could. He might prefer the result to derive solely from others.
I didn't bother voting in the "Biblical Flood" debate poll on rdf. It was hardly necessary.
ericmurphy is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:44 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.