FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-27-2008, 12:05 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mornington Peninsula
Posts: 1,306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
The Jesus Mysteries list has a note about this book:

Lord of the Cosmos: Mithras, Paul, and the Gospel of Mark (or via: amazon.co.uk) by Michael Patella

Amazon has one customer review, which trashed it for an alleged claim that Mithraism was around when Paul wrote...
Per the editorial review:
"In his own writings, Paul draws from Mithraic vocabulary and symbolism."

That's interesting, considering the earliest Roman mention of Mithras was by Statius (ca. 80-92 AD) and modern scholarship places the earliest known Roman Mithraic bull-slaying monument to ca. 100 AD (see Richard Gordon, "The date and significance of CIMRM 598 [British Museum, Townley Collection]", JMS 2, 1977-8, 148-74) and Paul was dead by then.
Perhaps, but Marcion wasn't!

I have read Mysteries of the Unconquered Sun by Beck and now know that;
'MITHRAS THE BULL-KILLER' means 'SUN IN LEO'

torchbearer on right means Taurus, torchbearer on left means Scorpius
and much else besides. You may note that Cautes (torch up) and Cautopates (torch down) may be on either the right or left depending upon the location of the 'Star-Talk' - Rhine or Rome. And so it goes. A few too many degrees of freedom I fancy.

I have been in several Mithraeum and Beck's imagery of the initiate visualising the earth at the cross-axis of the universal cave from his vantage point of the fixed stars in conjunction with his fellow mithraists is an intriguing and powerful one. Yet Beck's exegesis leaves a great deal to be realised. Thus p194
Since for the last quarter of a century I have devoted much of my research to the astral explication of the Mithraic tauroctony and its symbolic structure ... and refers to (amongst other refs) Beck on Mithraism
This is a trifle expensive for my taste - has anyone perchance perused this tome? Care to comment?
youngalexander is offline  
Old 01-27-2008, 11:00 AM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Quote:
Per the editorial review:
"In his own writings, Paul draws from Mithraic vocabulary and symbolism."

That's interesting, considering the earliest Roman mention of Mithras was by Statius (ca. 80-92 AD) and modern scholarship places the earliest known Roman Mithraic bull-slaying monument to ca. 100 AD (see Richard Gordon, "The date and significance of CIMRM 598 [British Museum, Townley Collection]", JMS 2, 1977-8, 148-74) and Paul was dead by then.

Or "Paul"'s letters may postdate Mithraism? :devil1:
Clivedurdle is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:28 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.