Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-02-2006, 06:35 PM | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,490
|
Mind telling where those are from, where they are located, and how long after Jesus and the legalism of his time that those were created?
|
07-02-2006, 06:54 PM | #22 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: home
Posts: 3,715
|
BTW there are other words for fish in Semitic languages. There's Nun (like Joshua's father) and there's the Aramaic word, not sure about its pronounciation, but its root is smk. The latter may have been the one Clive's source had in mind when claiming similarity to Mashiah. Not even the same consonants (kaf vs het) and different order.
|
07-03-2006, 02:40 AM | #23 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: London, United States of Europe.
Posts: 172
|
TS Eliot called this short poem of Robert Graves's "real poetry, the real thing." Its meaning is that the symbolism of the fish has changed from the pagan lusty & playful phallis to, in Christianity, a creature "proverbial for his sexual indifference" which "the Mother Superior [only] permits... as a convent pet because he cannot possibly awake any lascivious thoughts in her charges"; and that some nuns, at least, privately regretted the change.
Circling the circlings of their fish, Nuns walk in white and pray; For he is as chaste as they Who was dark-faced and hot in Silvia's day, And in his pool drowns each unspoken wish. |
07-03-2006, 05:56 AM | #24 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Quote:
Xianity grew in a world of gods and goddesses and sniffing volcanic fumes, of myth. It is accepted that these ideas have influenced xianity, but within an idea that xianity is new, is different. When the similarities were pointed out, the response was that satan was copying the things of god. Now the apologist response seems to be fish is a geographical historical fact of palestine - denying they are and always have been mythological symbols - I had forgotten the male rude bits! It co-evolved with the pagan world, is not separate from it but is an integral part of it. If we start looking seriously at myth and symbol in this religion, it is fascinating how the alleged historicity dissapears like a morning mist with the warmth of the day! |
|
07-03-2006, 06:34 AM | #25 | ||||
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,490
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
07-03-2006, 08:09 AM | #26 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Quote:
I actually see some very interesting political issues arising. The Roman Empire was very eclectic in terms of its religions, but needed to develop central means of control. Why not slowly develop a new religion to unify everyone politically? Pope Gregory said this - a mountain is climbed a step at a time, you cannot wipe away all heresy immediately. You start with the existing gods and myths and tweak them slightly, slowly evolving the idea. Are we looking at four hundred plus years of social engineering? Are the gospels actually the classic myths in this new religions clothing? |
|
07-03-2006, 08:16 AM | #27 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
http://www.iidb.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=169734
Go to the Jerusalem Post article. Why a picture of fish in a church? Why the religious number seven in the stories in the gospels about fish? Haran, did you actually read the Biblical passages above about fish and water? Have you ever read any Greek and Roman mythology? We are in mythical worlds here, like that of Aslan and Fodor, possibly with a political twist! |
07-03-2006, 08:41 AM | #28 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|