FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-01-2008, 04:02 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: mind the time rift, cardiff, wales
Posts: 645
Default was Josephus confused or have a short memory?

Josephus believed Vespasian to be the messiah so how can Testimonium Flavianum be reconciled to this fact?
jules? is offline  
Old 06-01-2008, 04:21 PM   #2
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 102
Default

Easy! It can't.
Moridin is offline  
Old 06-01-2008, 04:37 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Norway
Posts: 694
Default

It works well with R Eislers reconstruction, which you can see here.
thentian is offline  
Old 06-01-2008, 04:54 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: mind the time rift, cardiff, wales
Posts: 645
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thentian View Post
It works well with R Eislers reconstruction, which you can see here.
when compared to Jo's other attacks on wannabe messiahs Eislers' reconstruction reads well

Quote:
Now about this time arose an occasion for new disturbances, a certain Jesus, a wizard of a man, if indeed he may be called a man, who was the most monstrous of men, whom his disciples call a son of God, as having done wonders such as no man has ever done.... He was in fact a teacher of astonishing tricks to such men as accept the abnormal with delight.... And he seduced many Jews and many also of the Greek nation, and was regarded by them as the Messiah.... And when, on the indictment of the principal men among us, Pilate had sentenced him to the cross, still those who before had admired him did not cease to rave. For it seemed to them that having been dead for three days, he had appeared to them alive again, as the divinely-inspired prophets had foretold -- these and ten thousand other wonderful things -- concerning him. And even now the race of those who are called 'Messianists' after him is not extinct.
Quote:
CHAPTER 5.
CONCERNING THEUDAS AND THE SONS OF JUDAS THE GALILEAN; AS ALSO WHAT CALAMITY
FELL UPON THE JEWS ON THE DAY OF THE PASSOVER.
1. NOW it came to pass, while Fadus was procurator of Judea, that a certain
magician, whose name was Theudas, (9) persuaded a great part of the people to
take their effects with them, and follow him to the river Jordan; for he told
them he was a prophet, and that he would, by his own command, divide the river,
and afford them an easy passage over it; and many were deluded by his words.
However, Fadus did not permit them to make any advantage of his wild attempt,
but sent a troop of horsemen out against them; who, falling upon them
unexpectedly, slew many of them, and took many of them alive. They also took
Theudas alive, and cut off his head, and carried it to Jerusalem. This was what
befell the Jews in the time of Cuspius Fadus's government.
jules? is offline  
Old 06-01-2008, 05:15 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: ירושלים
Posts: 1,701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moridin View Post
Easy! It can't.
Say something substantive!
Solitary Man is offline  
Old 06-01-2008, 06:03 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Norway
Posts: 694
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jules? View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by thentian View Post
It works well with R Eislers reconstruction, which you can see here.
when compared to Jo's other attacks on wannabe messiahs Eislers' reconstruction reads well



Quote:
CHAPTER 5.
CONCERNING THEUDAS AND THE SONS OF JUDAS THE GALILEAN; AS ALSO WHAT CALAMITY
FELL UPON THE JEWS ON THE DAY OF THE PASSOVER.
1. NOW it came to pass, while Fadus was procurator of Judea, that a certain
magician, whose name was Theudas, (9) persuaded a great part of the people to
take their effects with them, and follow him to the river Jordan; for he told
them he was a prophet, and that he would, by his own command, divide the river,
and afford them an easy passage over it; and many were deluded by his words.
However, Fadus did not permit them to make any advantage of his wild attempt,
but sent a troop of horsemen out against them; who, falling upon them
unexpectedly, slew many of them, and took many of them alive. They also took
Theudas alive, and cut off his head, and carried it to Jerusalem. This was what
befell the Jews in the time of Cuspius Fadus's government.
Yes. All we can really tell from TF is that Josephus probably wrote something derogatory about Jesus, if he wrote anything at all.

There is another passage where Jesus is mentioned in passing in connection with the trial of his brother James, but this passage, too, has been challenged.
thentian is offline  
Old 06-01-2008, 07:19 PM   #7
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jules? View Post
Josephus believed Vespasian to be the messiah so how can Testimonium Flavianum be reconciled to this fact?
To be fair, you only have to assume the partial interpolation solution - that "He was the Messiah" was added to the passage. The description in the rest of the passage bears no resemblance to the Jewish Messiah as understood by the Jews.

But once you admit that the passage has been tampered with, how do you know when to stop?
Toto is offline  
Old 06-01-2008, 07:25 PM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: ירושלים
Posts: 1,701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by jules? View Post
Josephus believed Vespasian to be the messiah so how can Testimonium Flavianum be reconciled to this fact?
To be fair, you only have to assume the partial interpolation solution - that "He was the Messiah" was added to the passage. The description in the rest of the passage bears no resemblance to the Jewish Messiah as understood by the Jews.

But once you admit that the passage has been tampered with, how do you know when to stop?
Probably by using the same methods used with Classical texts.
Solitary Man is offline  
Old 06-01-2008, 07:28 PM   #9
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

So what method would tell you that the passage is partially interpolated versus a complete forgery?
Toto is offline  
Old 06-01-2008, 07:48 PM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: ירושלים
Posts: 1,701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
So what method would tell you that the passage is partially interpolated versus a complete forgery?
External sources, for one. Some methods subjective, such as "do the reconstructions fit the language and style of the author?" "does the passage entirely stick out from the surrounding context?" "what do the manuscripts say?" etc.
Solitary Man is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:21 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.