FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-30-2007, 02:59 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: florida
Posts: 887
Default are these articles good

and are their claims mirrored in other scholarly work?

http://www.rationalrevolution.net/ar...th_history.htm

http://www.rationalrevolution.net/ar...ospel_mark.htm
burning flames is offline  
Old 11-30-2007, 03:42 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 562
Default

They do not represent scholarly consensus in the least.
Zeichman is offline  
Old 11-30-2007, 03:43 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: florida
Posts: 887
Default

so they are some guy reandomly going through the gospel and relating it to the old testament? its fairly convincing...
burning flames is offline  
Old 11-30-2007, 03:54 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 562
Default

There's a huge matter of the excluded middle; appeal to epic traditions does not preclude historicity. He also overlooks important issues like multiple attestation of various stories, earlier forms of stories, etc.

Several of his parallels are extremely dubious and should be attributed to common cultural concerns of the time which strike the modern reader in a way they would not a person of antiquity.

If you're looking to get started in terms of critical biblical studies, I'd suggest looking into NT introductions written by Bart Ehrman or Steph(v?)en Harris, who are well qualified and present accessible and scholarly presentations of where biblical studies are at, without appealing to a Christian paradigm. What, specifically, are you looking for in terms of your study?
Zeichman is offline  
Old 11-30-2007, 03:59 PM   #5
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

These are by Malachi151, who posts here.
Toto is offline  
Old 11-30-2007, 04:13 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: florida
Posts: 887
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeichman View Post
There's a huge matter of the excluded middle; appeal to epic traditions does not preclude historicity. He also overlooks important issues like multiple attestation of various stories, earlier forms of stories, etc.

Several of his parallels are extremely dubious and should be attributed to common cultural concerns of the time which strike the modern reader in a way they would not a person of antiquity.

If you're looking to get started in terms of critical biblical studies, I'd suggest looking into NT introductions written by Bart Ehrman or Steph(v?)en Harris, who are well qualified and present accessible and scholarly presentations of where biblical studies are at, without appealing to a Christian paradigm. What, specifically, are you looking for in terms of your study?


well im interested in where christianity may have come from if it is not true, I just want to know more about it. I want to know everything. I want to know about its basis in other world myths if that is the case.
burning flames is offline  
Old 11-30-2007, 04:38 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 562
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burning flames View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeichman View Post
There's a huge matter of the excluded middle; appeal to epic traditions does not preclude historicity. He also overlooks important issues like multiple attestation of various stories, earlier forms of stories, etc.

Several of his parallels are extremely dubious and should be attributed to common cultural concerns of the time which strike the modern reader in a way they would not a person of antiquity.

If you're looking to get started in terms of critical biblical studies, I'd suggest looking into NT introductions written by Bart Ehrman or Steph(v?)en Harris, who are well qualified and present accessible and scholarly presentations of where biblical studies are at, without appealing to a Christian paradigm. What, specifically, are you looking for in terms of your study?


well im interested in where christianity may have come from if it is not true, I just want to know more about it. I want to know everything. I want to know about its basis in other world myths if that is the case.
Scholars do not think highly of the idea of Christianity "borrowing" from other religions such as mystery cults and whatnot. Though that's pretty popular online, you'd have a tough time finding scholars assert that. That said, there was a certain amount of Hellenistic and Roman cultural and intellectual influence on the Jews who were later identified as Christians. I think familiarizing yourself with major issues and concepts in study of the New Testament might be a good way to start. If you read a good introduction to the NT, you'll probably find something that'll really pique your interest (Historical Jesus, a specific gospel, Paul, Q, other epistles, etc.). Harris, from what I recall, does decent job of introducing the intellectual (and religious) world of First Century Palestine.

The New Testament: A Student's Introduction (or via: amazon.co.uk) by Stephen Harris (who is my preference) and A Brief Introduction to the New Testament (or via: amazon.co.uk) by Bart D. Ehrman are both really solid. They're not the cheapest books, but since they're frequently textbooks, you can probably find a used copy at a really reasonable price.

For something that requires less of a financial commitment, I would strongly suggest Mark Goodacre's NT Gateway website. http://ntgateway.com/ He differs from the consensus at some points, but nonetheless provides a great resource with that website.
Zeichman is offline  
Old 11-30-2007, 04:43 PM   #8
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeichman View Post
. . .
Scholars do not think highly of the idea of Christianity "borrowing" from other religions such as mystery cults and whatnot.
You are thinking of Christian scholars?

Quote:
That said, there was a certain amount of Hellenistic and Roman cultural and intellectual influence on the Jews who were later identified as Christians.
Is this just not a more politically corrent version of your first sentence? Hellenistic Judaism was a vibrant religion around the time of Christianity.
Toto is offline  
Old 11-30-2007, 04:48 PM   #9
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: BFE
Posts: 416
Default

Thanks, Zeichman, for those references. I'm going to get the Stephen Harris book and check it out. After all the discussion about Burton Mack we had in another thread, I went ahead and ordered "Who Wrote the New Testament" by him. Are you familiar with Mack or this book?

Michael
Mythra is offline  
Old 12-01-2007, 09:24 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 562
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeichman View Post
. . .
Scholars do not think highly of the idea of Christianity "borrowing" from other religions such as mystery cults and whatnot.
You are thinking of Christian scholars?
No. I simply thinking of individuals with PhDs in the New Testament who are alive today.

Quote:
Quote:
That said, there was a certain amount of Hellenistic and Roman cultural and intellectual influence on the Jews who were later identified as Christians.
Is this just not a more politically corrent version of your first sentence? Hellenistic Judaism was a vibrant religion around the time of Christianity.
I don't think so... Perhaps you could elaborate.

I'm not too fond of the term "Hellenistic Judaism" either, I think it's been rather unfashionable as of late. Galilean, Judean, Samaritan, and Diaspora Judaisms, I think, are the preferred nomenclature.

Mythra:
I'm very familiar with Mack. He, aside from Price, is debatably the most radical scholar in NT studies today. Though I disagree with a lot of his exegesis, he rightfully places a large emphasis on theory and does a valiant attempt to get out of the Luke-Acts/Eusebian paradigm for Christian origins. It's probably a good idea to balance him out with someone like Harris, which I see you're doing. Mack does a great job of making extremely complex ideas very accessible. Even though I disagree with a lot of what he says, I get something new from his books EVERY time I read them. I'd be delighted to discuss him more once your book comes. He's a very exciting author, and I'm glad to have seen him speak once.
Zeichman is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:04 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.