FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-01-2010, 03:59 PM   #1
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 322
Default Did the Israelites have an orgy at Mt. Sinai? (Exodus 32)

Exodus 32 (NIV)
5 When Aaron saw this, he built an altar in front of the calf and announced, "Tomorrow there will be a festival to the LORD." 6 So the next day the people rose early and sacrificed burnt offerings and presented fellowship offerings. Afterward they sat down to eat and drink and got up to indulge in revelry.
The verb is צחק, apparantly meaning to laugh, mock, sport, play, to make sport.
As far as I can see, it is used almost exclusively in the sense to laugh or mock. But also used once when Isaac is "laughing with" Rebekah (Gen 26:8) so that king Abimelech realises that she is Isaac's wife and not his sister. Merely a pun on "Isaac" (יצחק)?

Some commentaries assure that the Israelites go out of control horny, others that they merely celebrate, play or dance.

Other translations:
New Living Translation
After this, they celebrated with feasting and drinking, and they indulged in pagan revelry.

English Standard Version
And the people sat down to eat and drink and rose up to play.

GOD'S WORD Translation (1995)
Afterward, they sat down to a feast, which turned into an orgy.

Bible in Basic English
and took their seats at the feast, and then gave themselves to pleasure.

Darby Bible Translation
and the people sat down to eat and to drink, and rose up to sport.

When Moses, in verse 25, descends from the mountain he finds them "getting naked" or "out of control".

So... were they playing cricket or getting it on orgy style?
Cesc is offline  
Old 08-01-2010, 05:01 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: In a nondescript, black helicopter.
Posts: 6,637
Default

I hear they had nothing on those in Sodom and Gomorrah.
braces_for_impact is offline  
Old 08-02-2010, 08:31 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cesc View Post
So... were they playing cricket or getting it on orgy style?
Whatever suits your imagination, I guess, considering it's all fiction anyway.
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 08-02-2010, 12:50 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 9,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cesc View Post
Exodus 32 (NIV)
5 When Aaron saw this, he built an altar in front of the calf and announced, "Tomorrow there will be a festival to the LORD." 6 So the next day the people rose early and sacrificed burnt offerings and presented fellowship offerings. Afterward they sat down to eat and drink and got up to indulge in revelry.
The verb is צחק, apparantly meaning to laugh, mock, sport, play, to make sport.
As far as I can see, it is used almost exclusively in the sense to laugh or mock. But also used once when Isaac is "laughing with" Rebekah (Gen 26:8) so that king Abimelech realises that she is Isaac's wife and not his sister. Merely a pun on "Isaac" (יצחק)?

Some commentaries assure that the Israelites go out of control horny, others that they merely celebrate, play or dance.

Other translations:
New Living Translation
After this, they celebrated with feasting and drinking, and they indulged in pagan revelry.

English Standard Version
And the people sat down to eat and drink and rose up to play.

GOD'S WORD Translation (1995)
Afterward, they sat down to a feast, which turned into an orgy.

Bible in Basic English
and took their seats at the feast, and then gave themselves to pleasure.

Darby Bible Translation
and the people sat down to eat and to drink, and rose up to sport.

When Moses, in verse 25, descends from the mountain he finds them "getting naked" or "out of control".

So... were they playing cricket or getting it on orgy style?
Apparently, they were partying. Perhaps celebrating their freedom from slavery under the Egyptians.
rhutchin is offline  
Old 08-02-2010, 12:56 PM   #5
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin
Apparently, they were partying. Perhaps celebrating their freedom from slavery under the Egyptians.
Obviously not since there is not any credible evidence that the Exodus and the Ten Plagues occurred in Egypt.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 08-02-2010, 04:30 PM   #6
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Northeastern OH but you can't get here from there
Posts: 415
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Shaver View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cesc View Post
So... were they playing cricket or getting it on orgy style?
Whatever suits your imagination, I guess, considering it's all fiction anyway.
Darn. You beat me to it.
darstec is offline  
Old 08-03-2010, 03:56 AM   #7
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 322
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cesc View Post
...

So... were they playing cricket or getting it on orgy style?
Apparently, they were partying. Perhaps celebrating their freedom from slavery under the Egyptians.
But is this a story about them making a golden calf and then worshipping it with dancing and singing, as children around the world are being taught - or is the author actually telling us that the one million Israelites were having frenzied sex with each other? Is there a justification for translating it as "orgy"?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Shaver View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cesc View Post
So... were they playing cricket or getting it on orgy style?
Whatever suits your imagination, I guess, considering it's all fiction anyway.
Yes, well that is a very easy way to do biblical criticism, then... And I'd have to go with cricket.
Cesc is offline  
Old 08-03-2010, 06:24 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hillsborough, NJ
Posts: 3,551
Default

Standard Jewish Exegesis is that it was just the men.

This is supported by:

Quote:
Exodus 35:22
They came, both men and women, as many as were willing-hearted, and brought brooches, earrings, signet rings, and armlets, all jewels of gold; even every man who offered an offering of gold to Yahweh.
The key word here is armlets which is actually a mistranslation of kumaz which is usually considered to mean body ornaments.

http://bible.ort.org/books/pentd2.as...r&pentid=P2563

(interesting site)

Quote:
Kumaz in Hebrew. According to some, the jeweled belt (Saadia; Peshitah). According to others, a gold genital shield for women (Shabbath 84a; Rashi), possibly a chastity belt (Rabbenu Ephraim; Maskil LeDavid; Maaseh Toviah, Gan Naul 3). Others say that it is a gold brassiere (Yerushalmi, Shabbath 6:4), an arm band (Chizzkuni), or a pornographic sculpture (Rabbi Aaron Alrabi, Kenzal). The Septuagint translates kumaz as emplokion, something that holds a garment, possibly a brooch or belt (cf. Hirsch; Pliny 11:50; Diodorus Siclus 3:44).
Rav Joseph said the letters KMZ is an anagram for k'am makom zimah or this is the place of obscenity.

Rashi discusses this is in most Jewish Chumashes, but they don't usually translate it into English, the hebrew is in a separate section.

Anyway the women are said not to have taken part in the Golden Calf incident, if only because they were wearing chastity devices.
semiopen is offline  
Old 08-03-2010, 08:27 PM   #9
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Northeastern OH but you can't get here from there
Posts: 415
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cesc View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhutchin View Post

Apparently, they were partying. Perhaps celebrating their freedom from slavery under the Egyptians.
But is this a story about them making a golden calf and then worshipping it with dancing and singing, as children around the world are being taught - or is the author actually telling us that the one million Israelites were having frenzied sex with each other? Is there a justification for translating it as "orgy"?
Technically it was not a calf. It was a bull. The bull was one of the representations (an eye being the other) of the Hebrew god of war and thunder, namely Yahweh. What we have left is 800 years after the supposed events the returning princes and high priests garbled the stories.

They wrote out the polytheism of the ancient Hebrews and forced their newly learned (from the Babylonians, Zoroastrians and Persians) monotheism on the residents. Most of the history they simply fabricated. The rest they got wrong.

Look how they screwed up the story of Abraham pretending his wife was his sister. Another story where they remembered an item or two but forgot the whole underlying culture.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cesc View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Shaver View Post
Whatever suits your imagination, I guess, considering it's all fiction anyway.
Yes, well that is a very easy way to do biblical criticism, then... And I'd have to go with cricket.
Are you saying the bible is history?
darstec is offline  
Old 08-04-2010, 04:08 AM   #10
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 322
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by semiopen View Post
Standard Jewish Exegesis is that it was just the men.

This is supported by:

Quote:
Exodus 35:22
They came, both men and women, as many as were willing-hearted, and brought brooches, earrings, signet rings, and armlets, all jewels of gold; even every man who offered an offering of gold to Yahweh.
The key word here is armlets which is actually a mistranslation of kumaz which is usually considered to mean body ornaments.

http://bible.ort.org/books/pentd2.as...r&pentid=P2563

(interesting site)

Quote:
Kumaz in Hebrew. According to some, the jeweled belt (Saadia; Peshitah). According to others, a gold genital shield for women (Shabbath 84a; Rashi), possibly a chastity belt (Rabbenu Ephraim; Maskil LeDavid; Maaseh Toviah, Gan Naul 3). Others say that it is a gold brassiere (Yerushalmi, Shabbath 6:4), an arm band (Chizzkuni), or a pornographic sculpture (Rabbi Aaron Alrabi, Kenzal). The Septuagint translates kumaz as emplokion, something that holds a garment, possibly a brooch or belt (cf. Hirsch; Pliny 11:50; Diodorus Siclus 3:44).
Rav Joseph said the letters KMZ is an anagram for k'am makom zimah or this is the place of obscenity.

Rashi discusses this is in most Jewish Chumashes, but they don't usually translate it into English, the hebrew is in a separate section.

Anyway the women are said not to have taken part in the Golden Calf incident, if only because they were wearing chastity devices.
Interesting. But what about the "feast"? Was it an all-male orgy, then?? Do you know what Rashi said about that?



Quote:
Originally Posted by darstec View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cesc View Post
But is this a story about them making a golden calf and then worshipping it with dancing and singing, as children around the world are being taught - or is the author actually telling us that the one million Israelites were having frenzied sex with each other? Is there a justification for translating it as "orgy"?
Technically it was not a calf. It was a bull. The bull was one of the representations (an eye being the other) of the Hebrew god of war and thunder, namely Yahweh. What we have left is 800 years after the supposed events the returning princes and high priests garbled the stories.

They wrote out the polytheism of the ancient Hebrews and forced their newly learned (from the Babylonians, Zoroastrians and Persians) monotheism on the residents. Most of the history they simply fabricated. The rest they got wrong.

Look how they screwed up the story of Abraham pretending his wife was his sister. Another story where they remembered an item or two but forgot the whole underlying culture.
How do you know the golden bull and an eye were representations of the early war/thundergod Yahweh?
How did they screw up the story of Abraham?

Quote:
Originally Posted by darstec View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cesc View Post
Yes, well that is a very easy way to do biblical criticism, then... And I'd have to go with cricket.
Are you saying the bible is history?
No, I'm saying that just because the text is fiction it doesn't mean that you can decide from imagination what it says.
Cesc is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:36 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.