Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-15-2010, 11:05 PM | #11 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: somewhere overseas
Posts: 153
|
Quote:
Ussher was an idiot and did no one any favors. He did not evenknow how the Biblical writers wrote the geneologies which renders his calculations worthless. modern geologists, etc., have no clue and are only guessing and why would you include evolutionary biologists? Their views do not include a flood so their commets and studies belong in the trash. God does not provide a date, you will not find one for the flood. Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
03-16-2010, 12:29 AM | #12 | |||
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 89
|
Quote:
How exactly was the so called pre-flood pottery destroyed? Why would it be difficult to date any flood artifact? Surely the mass of human made pottery mixed with dinosaur bones and of course the undeciphered writing and symbols carved on pterodactyl fossils should at least roughly date the flood just as we presently date using carvings on mammoth tusks and bones. Any human artifact in situ with T Rex fossils (even a human it had for lunch) could be used to date the find to at least pre or post flood. |
|||
03-16-2010, 02:09 AM | #13 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: somewhere overseas
Posts: 153
|
Quote:
links to credible references concerning the carvings on mammoths etc. and dating . As for your initial question, please demonstrate which artifacts are from the flood , pre and post. i doubt you would know and if you did present some I bet you would have many detractors who would disagree with you. |
|
03-16-2010, 02:14 AM | #14 | ||
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 89
|
Quote:
|
||
03-16-2010, 02:19 AM | #15 | ||
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 89
|
Quote:
|
||
03-16-2010, 02:20 AM | #16 | ||
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 89
|
Quote:
|
||
03-16-2010, 03:22 AM | #17 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Collingswood, NJ
Posts: 1,259
|
Guesses do not produce multiple consistent, consilient measurements of anything. Nothing in the record that repeats annually - lake varves, ice cores, tree rings etc - matches up with anything that would indicate a flood in the last 10,000 years, and everything that repeats annually confirms other methods of dating such as radiocarbon. You cannot explain consilience with "guesses."
|
03-16-2010, 08:39 AM | #18 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 4,380
|
Quote:
Its just fun to watch the contortions that the theocreologists will go thru to try to come up with a date, same as watching them try to prove there really was a flood. My personal fav. is the theory that all the reason there is no evidence for the flood is that god cleaned up the mess; with proof who needs faith; and the water went to neptune where it now serves as a warning beacon for wayward angels. what is yours? |
|
03-16-2010, 08:43 AM | #19 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 4,380
|
Quote:
modern geologists, etc., have no clue and are only guessing Modern geologists find the whole bit about the flood to be stupid and tiresome. They are, btw, actually quite good at what they do do (which doesnt include trying to date a mythical event) and dont rely on guess work. |
|||
03-16-2010, 08:50 AM | #20 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
|
Quote:
If some of the laws of physics were not altered, there is not way that a global flood could have occured. We can discuss this issue at the Evolution/Creation forum if you wish. If you have any evidence that the Bible is inerrant, please post it. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|