FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-02-2005, 11:09 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: WV
Posts: 4,369
Default How many messiahs were there?

I've heard that there were as many as 30+ "messiahs" within a hundred of so years of Jesus' supposed existence. But then I heard that source was dubious (and now it's long lost to me). I have only previously found like maybe 5 messiahs that seem pretty definite. Anyone know of any relatively solid lists with short descriptions of each messiah?
emphryio is offline  
Old 09-02-2005, 11:20 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: WV
Posts: 4,369
Default

Well I suppose this is a pretty decent link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messiah...siah_claimants
emphryio is offline  
Old 09-02-2005, 11:29 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

This is a rather good website:

Livius

kind thoughts,
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 09-02-2005, 12:06 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: WV
Posts: 4,369
Default

That site seems to be assuming that Jesus existed.
emphryio is offline  
Old 09-02-2005, 12:16 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by emphryio
That site seems to be assuming that Jesus existed.
It seems to be assuming that over 30 people existed, yet you balk at this one.

kind thoughts,
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 09-02-2005, 12:25 PM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

I have my doubts about Moses of Crete
Quote:
When at length the Jews perceived how fearfully they had been duped, they blamed their own indiscreet credulity, and sought to lay hold of the pseudo-Moses in order to put him to death. But they were unable to seize them, for he suddenly disappeared, which induced a general belief that it was some malignant fiend, who had assumed a human form for the destruction of their nation in that place.
It's just too good a story.
Toto is offline  
Old 09-02-2005, 12:28 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: WV
Posts: 4,369
Default

I would hope they would at least mention the controvery of Josephus supposedly becoming a christian for one paragraph and all else along those lines, as I would hope they would mention anything dubious about these other supposed messiahs. I guess it's not important.
emphryio is offline  
Old 09-02-2005, 12:32 PM   #8
CJD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: greater Orlando area
Posts: 832
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by emphryio
I would hope they would at least mention the controvery of Josephus supposedly becoming a christian for one paragraph and all else along those lines, as I would hope they would mention anything dubious about these other supposed messiahs. I guess it's not important.
From Livius:

Quote:
It should be stressed that this is a reconstruction of Josephus' words; our manuscripts are full of interpolations. (Go here for a discussion of the exact wording of this text.) … It is unlikely that a pious Jew like Flavius Josephus would have written that Jesus 'appeared to them on the third day, living again'; consequently, there has been a lot of scholarly debate about the explanation of this strange remark. Some argued that we had to admit that Flavius Josephus had become a Christian; others maintained that it was made up by some Byzantine monk who copied the Jewish Antiquities. The latter explanation can be ruled out because a more or less identical text had been found in an Arabian translation of a part of the Jewish Antiquities. In 1991, John Meier has suggested that Josephus did in fact mention Jesus, but that the text was glossed by a Christian author.
Read much?
CJD is offline  
Old 09-02-2005, 12:34 PM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by emphryio
I would hope they would at least mention the controvery of Josephus supposedly becoming a christian for one paragraph and all else along those lines, as I would hope they would mention anything dubious about these other supposed messiahs. I guess it's not important.
Here's what Jona Lendering has to say about Josephus and Jesus:

Quote:
It is unlikely that a pious Jew like Flavius Josephus would have written that Jesus 'appeared to them on the third day, living again'; consequently, there has been a lot of scholarly debate about the explanation of this strange remark. Some argued that we had to admit that Flavius Josephus had become a Christian; others maintained that it was made up by some Byzantine monk who copied the Jewish Antiquities. The latter explanation can be ruled out because a more or less identical text had been found in an Arabian translation of a part of the Jewish Antiquities. In 1991, John Meier has suggested that Josephus did in fact mention Jesus, but that the text was glossed by a Christian author. His reconstruction of the text is as follows:

At this time there appeared Jesus, a wise man. For he was a doer of startling deeds, a teacher of the people who receive the truth with pleasure. And he gained a following both among many Jews and among many of Greek origin. And when Pilate, because of an accusation made by the leading men among us, condemned him to the cross, those who had loved him previously did not cease to do so. And up until this very day the tribe of Christians, named after him, has not died out.

Even in this reconstruction, this text is of monumental importance. Not only is Flavius Josephus the only first century non-Christian writer mentioning Jesus' life, teachings and death independently of the of the gospels, but he also suggests that Jesus was innocent. A straightforward report would have told that Pilate executed the man from Nazareth because he was considered to be the king of the Jews. But instead of naming the accusation, the Jewish historian names the accusers. Since he usually delights in writing about the deserved punishment of rebels and pretenders, the fact that he does not inform us of the charge, means that he thought that Jesus was innocent.
kind thoughts,
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 09-02-2005, 01:17 PM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: WV
Posts: 4,369
Default

Considering how the christians grasp for anything, if Josephus had even originally said that much surely some other writer would have mentioned it before the 400 AD.
emphryio is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:05 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.