FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-04-2008, 12:23 PM   #91
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

There's already a long thread on this - hold on for the merger
Toto is offline  
Old 02-05-2008, 03:58 AM   #92
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Norway
Posts: 2,159
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by reniaa View Post
so at what point when reading a document do we say "well we have the person, the place and the event corroborated by outside sources so it must have happenned?"
give me a specific example of which we have the person, the place and the event mentioned in the bible and corroborated by outside sources. then, i'd like you to explain how it would lend credibility to any of the supernatural claims in the bible. how does one historical fact mentioned in the bible prove, or even suggest, that any of the supernatural phenomenons were real?

not to mention, how does one accurate story lend credibility to other stories? if that is all what it takes, why aren't you a muslim or a mormon? real people, real places and corroborated by other sources.
Random Evil Guy is offline  
Old 02-05-2008, 10:16 AM   #93
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,808
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mg01 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minimalist View Post
She may be admitting she got the name was wrong (which is fine and decent of her, really) ....but the Babylonian symbolism remains.
I find it rather curious that the protrusions from the alter are explained a as the priests "burning incense". Horned alters used for bull sacrifices are commonly found in the Levant and described in the Bible are they not? Maybe they're trying to further downplay the obviously lunar symbology.

Compare the alter and the moon. "On Earth as it is in Heaven"...

The Babylonian army did overrun the area and hold it for 50 years. Even though the fighting front moved on towards Egypt there would have had to be a line of communication stretching through the area. They didn't abandon it.

It's really not much of a stretch to think that later building projects scraped up fill from the ground and dumped it inside new buildings. That's why it is hard to get too excited about the context of archaeological finds in the area. Simply too much continued human habitation and activity to mess up the stratigraphy.
Minimalist is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:07 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.