![]()  | 
	
		Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2005 
				Location: USA, Missouri 
				
				
					Posts: 3,070
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			My question is simple: If Paul did not believe that Jesus had been a religious teacher who walked the earth, and Valentinus and Marcion both claimed secret knowledge derived from Paul, why didn't either one of them deny a HJ?  By 'HJ' I don't require that to mean a human being--just the appearance of one.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2006 
				Location: The Netherlands 
				
				
					Posts: 3,397
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2005 
				Location: USA, Missouri 
				
				
					Posts: 3,070
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	If the secret was that Paul didn't believe in a HJ then that would have formed the basis for their views. Instead they would have been rejecting the very Paul they claimed to respect.  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2006 
				Location: The Netherlands 
				
				
					Posts: 3,397
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	Consider, from what we know of Marcion for instance, that there was a belief in a Jesus who was not really a human at all. How would something like this apply to your question?  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | ||
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2005 
				Location: USA, Missouri 
				
				
					Posts: 3,070
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
||
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2006 
				Location: The Netherlands 
				
				
					Posts: 3,397
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#7 | ||
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2005 
				Location: USA, Missouri 
				
				
					Posts: 3,070
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
||
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#8 | ||
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2006 
				Location: The Netherlands 
				
				
					Posts: 3,397
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	Quote: 
	
  | 
||
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#9 | |||
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2005 
				Location: USA, Missouri 
				
				
					Posts: 3,070
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			sorry for any confusion.  I've edited the OP to be clearer. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Quote: 
	
  | 
|||
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#10 | |
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Feb 2006 
				Location: the fringe of the caribbean 
				
				
					Posts: 18,988
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Please, get familiar with Scholarship or you may be come across as one who promotes Propaganda. You have been posting on this forum for years so you ought to know that you are presenting mis-leading information. Please, let me remind you the claim in Apologetic sources that Jesus existed in Judea as the Son of a Holy Ghost and God the Creator is NOT, is Not, is NOT an "HJ". How many times must we go through your errors??? 1. Jesus of the NT is NOT an historical Jesus. 2. NT Jesus is a Jesus of FAITH--a Divine Jesus--a Myth. 3. There is an ON-GOING Quest for an historical Jesus. Please, get familiar with Scholarship or you may come across as one who is ill-informed but don't care.  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
		
  |