Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-15-2013, 12:51 AM | #1 | ||||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
off topic posts split from what is Jewish
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
It is most remarkable that those who claim the Therapeutae were Jewish do NOT even know what it means to be Jewish or what it means to "indicate" that the Therapeutae were Jewish. We can examine every word in "On the Contemplative Life" and not one word indicates that the Therapeutae were Jewish. It is the REVERSE. Philo NEVER identified or indicated that a single Therapeutae lived in Judea, or was of Jewish origin. |
||||
02-15-2013, 01:25 AM | #2 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
It is wholly absurd that Jews only write about Jews. Philo specifically stated that the Therapeutae were found in ALL DISTRICTS of Egypt. It is blatant nonsense that Philo could be referring only to Jews. On the Contemplative Life Quote:
|
||
02-15-2013, 06:53 AM | #3 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
Quote:
And yes, these are also looking for that holy ground as it obviously is not the one they are standing on, and so 'on the move' they are, as 'look-alikes' who will befriend their neighbor of any sort so they can do him too. Holly rollers, is what they are. |
|||
02-15-2013, 07:46 AM | #4 |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Again, Philo indicated that he was writing about people all over Egypt who were of the Therapeutae sect. It is wholly illogical that Philo was referring to ONLY Jews when he wrote about people in Egypt.
Philo indicated that the Therapeutae were in EVERY DISTRICT in Egypt and it is far more likely that Egyptians, NOT Jews, are in every DISTRICT of Egypt. Philo's Therapeutae were Egyptians if NOT all of them. |
02-15-2013, 08:19 AM | #5 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
Quote:
Cf the difference here between Matthew's "out of Egypt I have called my son" who made only a pitstop in Nazareth so he will "be called a Nazorean" but actually was not? Then compare this with Luke where he was Judean through and through, with Nazareth as the prevailing dominance in the mind of this Jew. I have a feeling that Eqypt is not the place to be as Jew, which now makes reference to a state of mind and not the physical boundaries of a land, for Jewish-ness pertains only to the Jew in him. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|