Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-09-2006, 04:41 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
|
Bible apologetics refuted
My opening statement is directed towards Christians, although skeptics are certainly welcome to make comments.
Apologists assume that God is good, but I do not see any good reasons at all to assume that God is good and that the Devil is evil. Actually, I do not see any good reasons at all to believe that there is a Devil. Why isn’t it plausible that God is planning on sending everyone to hell, and is enjoying deceiving a lot of people into following him by accurately predicting the future and sometimes healing sick people? The Resurrection might have been one of his deceptions. If there can be an evil and deceptive Devil, why can’t there be an evil and deceptive God? As a side issue, Christians claim that there is sufficient evidence for people to become Christians. For example, William Lane Craig speaks of "multiple, independent attestations." Many Christians put great emphasis on the the 5,000 existing copies of the original manuscripts, the historical accuracy of the Bible, and Biblical archaeology. Is such evidence really all that convincing? Well, it is to lots of people, but ONLY because the Bible promises believers a comfortable eternal life. There should not be any doubts whatsoever that if all of the evidence were EXACTLY the same with the single exception that God is evil and will send everyone to hell, not only would Christians have rejected Christianity, but they would have gone out of there way to disprove it and accept another religion that promised them eternal comfort. No matter what the religion, the lure of eternal comfort will ALWAYS cause believers to defend all kinds of perposterous and outlandish claims. It is interesting to note that the followers of all religions couldn't care less who provides them with eternal comfort as long as it is available. Eternal comfort is definitely to goal. Who provides it is completely irrelevant. |
01-09-2006, 05:19 PM | #2 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
I don't see much Biblical criticism here. I think this would do better in GRD.
|
01-10-2006, 04:09 AM | #3 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 431
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
01-10-2006, 08:43 AM | #4 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: outraged about the stiffling of free speech here
Posts: 10,987
|
Quote:
So your response to "why god could not be evil" is basically: "Because I don't like this possibility." |
|
01-10-2006, 12:14 PM | #5 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
|
Quote:
God allows evil for reasons known only to him, and not to the people suffering. So Christians admit God is concealing some very important facts from them. If God is deluding Christians, so he can get all the greater pleasure from seeing them burn in hell, he would very naturally conceal that from them. |
|
01-10-2006, 01:11 PM | #6 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: US
Posts: 390
|
Quote:
|
|
01-12-2006, 03:19 AM | #7 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 431
|
Hi Sven -
Quote:
Hi Steven Carr - Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
01-12-2006, 07:39 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
|
Bible apologetics refuted
[quote=Helpmabob] Hi Sven - It’s true that I don’t like the possibility, but I’m not saying that God could not be evil, only that I am reasonably well convinced that He is not. If you count your blessings you will find that you have many good things, which an evil god would want to stop immediately. I was trying to point out the futility of existence under an evil, deceptive God.
quote] Why do you as a mere mortal presume to know what an evil God will choose to do? Deceiving people is exactly what an evil God would do. Matthew 24:24says "For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect." If an evil God exists, there wouldn't be any elect. Which "many good things" are you referring to? It is your position that good things and bad things are not distributed at random according to the laws of physics? Regarding "the futility of existence under an evil, deceptive God," emotionalism is not a logical basis for making up religions. |
01-13-2006, 02:56 AM | #9 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 431
|
Hi Johnny -
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
01-13-2006, 03:27 AM | #10 |
Contributor
Join Date: May 2003
Location: ɹǝpunuʍop puɐן ǝɥʇ
Posts: 17,906
|
Well the bible God could certainly be called evil.
God deceives some of his prophets and then kills them for believing his lies. 14:9 "And if the prophet be deceived when he hath spoken a thing, I the LORD have deceived that prophet, and I will stretch out my hand upon him, and will destroy him from the midst of my people Israel." |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|