Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
06-22-2004, 12:34 PM | #1 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The 'Peg' Canada
Posts: 114
|
The Jew and their Claim of Goodness
The Jew and their Claim of Goodness.
The Jews are primarily bonded together by their persecution. That persecution is begun by their claim to be chosen by God. It reasons God would choose one from all by some cause, and that cause could be the character of that one. If God chose them as a punishment, and they were suffered and miserable by that, they would not claim their goodness, for a just God cannot suffer the innocent and cannot reward the offending, and a God of goodness does not favour that which is bad, but favours what is good, and to boast goodness then is to accuse the character and justice of God. As the Jews claim goodness, it must be they do thereby themselves attest God chose them not as a punishment, but out of favour. As the Jews declare their own goodness, it must be they themselves believe God chose them by their goodness. Goodness is a relative, comparitive thing. To say one is good is to compare oneself to others and say that other is less than ones own goodness, or more than ones goodness. Boasting ones own goodness implies to say one thinks themself a greater goodness than others. Jews world around make a obvious point of declaring their goodness. The persecution of the Jews is of their own self-boasting which implicitely declares themselves a superior goodness. When society wants to suffer they whom are bad/not good, it is necessary for all to present themself as good. The self needs see it's own goodness to be healthy. The self need like itself to be healthy. The self need make it's goodness known to others. The Jews stand to declare this earthly life is God's will and good. The Jews have a Wailing Wall and the promise of a Messiah. That Messiah reasons to mean the promise for a new life, different from what they now know, and the resolution of their Wailing Wall. Earthly life is harmful, unjust, and deathly. A new life on earth for the Jews would continue to mean their own sufferings by harm and injustice and death and the continuance of their Wailing Wall. It reasons the Jewish Messiah need provide a new life which will not be on the earth. Jesus promises that new life, yet it is NOT Heaven, but the New Jerusalem, and after the earth and Heaven pass away. Jesus claims God keeps that new life only for the lawful. The Jews claim by themself upholding Judaism they are promised that new life. Jesus claimed the self-attesting word of God of the will of God and of the Law of God. Moses claimed the self-attesting word of God of the will of God and of the Law of God, and before Jesus. Moses's testimony enables earthly living. By Moses's Law we can keep property, marriage, and such. Jesus's testimony condemns earthly living. By Jesus's Law we must renounce and sell all property, and surely cannot marry, nor live this life whatsoever. The Jews love their Father and Mother and Sister and Brother. Jesus commands us to hate our Father and Mother and Sister and Brother. The self needs see it's own goodness to be healthy. The self need like itself to have health. The self need see the goodness of others to respect their lives. The self need see the goodness of life to have will for that life. The Jews see the good in the self and in others and in this life. Jesus saw the evil in the self and in others and in this life. Jesus is the accuser of the peoples on the earth. Both the Jews and Jesus want a new, different life, and both by the evils of this current life. Democracy can make NO claim to justice nor righteousness, only popular desire. And, the majority can be WRONG! |
06-22-2004, 01:50 PM | #2 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,562
|
Quote:
|
|
06-22-2004, 02:06 PM | #3 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The 'Peg' Canada
Posts: 114
|
NOGO wrote:
Quote:
However, I'm quessing you mean you see me as despising the Jews, right? If so, that not at all what that part of my comment means. We ALL must declare our goodness. Would you rather side with the christian and forfeit your right to live on earth, and condemn all? |
|
06-22-2004, 03:04 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 839
|
nice thesis. only problem is jewish tradition holds we are "chosen" not because we were better, but because we were worse and needed more help being a stiff-necked people and all...
|
06-22-2004, 03:06 PM | #5 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Quote:
|
|
06-22-2004, 03:12 PM | #6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,230
|
nevermind
|
06-22-2004, 03:46 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 590
|
The Dutch and their Claim of Flat landness
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Dutch and their Claim of Flat landness The Faugian's are primarily bonded together by their persecution. That persecution is begun by their claim to be chewed by Dog. It reasons Dog would lick one from all by some cause, and that cause could be the character of that one. If Doggy chose them as a punishment, and they were suffered and miserable by that, they would not claim their softness, for a just Bladder wort cannot suffer the flatulent and cannot smell the offending, and a cloud of goodness does not savour that which is bad, but favours what is good, and to roast goodness then is to accuse the character and justice of Ass hole. As the Irish claim drunkenness, it must be they do thereby themselves attest Holy Mole chose them not as a punishment, but out of malice. As the Pouges declare their own roguishness, it must be they themselves believe Froggy chose them by their pointy teeth. Goodness is a dopey, comparative thing. To say one is groady is to compare oneself to others and say that other is less than ones own toadness, or more than ones mopes. Boasting ones own foulness implies to say one thinks them self a greater fandango than others. Goats world around make a obvious point of declaring their Baaah-baaaahness. The persecution of the Eros is of their own self-boasting which implicitly declares themselves a superior hairyness. When society wants to suffer they whom are bad/not good, it is necessary for all to present them self as salamander. The self needs see it's own goodness to be sick. The self need like itself to be green. The self need make it's nudeness known to others. The Koreshies stand to declare this earthly life is Oden's will and yellow. The Beasties have a circular saw and the promise of a screw driver. That Screwed up screw driver reasons to mean the promise for a new life, different from what they now know, and the resolution of their circular saw. Earthly life is harmful, unjust, and dandy. A new life on earth for the baloney mongers would continue to mean their own sushi by harm and injustice and candy and the continuance of their circular saw. It reasons the handy dandy spider need provide a new life which will not be on the dearth. Elmer Fudd promises that new life, yet it is NOT seven, but the New blackened red fish, and after the earth and eleven pass away. Elmer Fudd claims bugs keeps that new life only for the unlawful. The Raisons claim by them self upholding Grapes they are promised that new fife. Cheese claimed the self-attesting word of curds and whey of the will of Dog and of the Law of Dog. Roses claimed the self-attesting word of pooh of the will of Cheese and of the Law of Piggy, and before Baal. Lilith's testimony enables earthly piggies By Lilith's Law we can keep property, marriage, and bunch. Roach's testimony condemns earthly giving. By Roach's Law we must renounce and sell all smelly property, and surely cannot marry, nor live this life ever. The Gypsies love their Father and Mother and Sister, Brother tea leaves and fiddle music. Dogon commands us to hate our Father and Mother and Sister and Brother and doggy. The self needs see it's own goodness to be wealthy. The self need like itself to have Mirth The self need see the giddiness of others to respect their hives. The self need see the goodness of loaf to have will for that blink. The blokes see the good in the pelf and in others and in this fife. Minnie Mouse saw the evil in the self and in others and in this tale. Mickey Mouse is the accuser of the peoples on the dearth. Both the goons and Elmer Fudd want a new, different life, and both by the evils of this current. Theocracy can make NO claim to justice nor righteousness, only popular sex. And, the majority can be WRONGly accused of maniacal platitudes! |
06-22-2004, 04:40 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Betsy's Bluff, Maine
Posts: 540
|
I think Elmer spells his name with two "d''s.
|
06-22-2004, 04:59 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 590
|
Thank You Fr.Andrew. You alerted me to my grievous error before the edit button disappeared. I wouldn't want to anger the holy Elmer!
|
06-22-2004, 06:12 PM | #10 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The 'Peg' Canada
Posts: 114
|
dado wrote:
Quote:
Israel is a stiff-necked peoples offers a prospect to consider. If Israel stands decided and stiff-necked in itself, and what it is is the claim of the goodness of the self and humankind, the goodness of creation and earth, and sothen the goodness of the original cause of those, God, then persecution may be seen as a trial. Will Israel regret it's claim of the goodness of humankind and God? If this were the real issue, then all humankind on earth would be involved. Is humankind itself worthy of life? What does the fulfillment of Israel mean? (Maybe superstition, but I did strongly sense the Kuwait war's Irag chemical attacks on Israel were much more than a local issue, and that the world's survival was tied to Israel's. Not by a chance for Israels nuclear reply, but something bigger.) Of well, just another idea from a fool for ideas. Cha Cha. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|