FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Elsewhere > ~Elsewhere~
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-22-2004, 12:34 PM   #1
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The 'Peg' Canada
Posts: 114
Default The Jew and their Claim of Goodness

The Jew and their Claim of Goodness.

The Jews are primarily bonded together by their persecution.
That persecution is begun by their claim to be chosen by God.
It reasons God would choose one from all by some cause, and
that cause could be the character of that one.
If God chose them as a punishment, and they were suffered and
miserable by that, they would not claim their goodness, for
a just God cannot suffer the innocent and cannot reward the
offending, and a God of goodness does not favour that which
is bad, but favours what is good, and to boast goodness then
is to accuse the character and justice of God.
As the Jews claim goodness, it must be they do thereby
themselves attest God chose them not as a punishment,
but out of favour.
As the Jews declare their own goodness, it must be they
themselves believe God chose them by their goodness.

Goodness is a relative, comparitive thing. To say one is good
is to compare oneself to others and say that other is less than
ones own goodness, or more than ones goodness.
Boasting ones own goodness implies to say one thinks themself
a greater goodness than others.
Jews world around make a obvious point of declaring their
goodness.
The persecution of the Jews is of their own self-boasting
which implicitely declares themselves a superior goodness.

When society wants to suffer they whom are bad/not good,
it is necessary for all to present themself as good.

The self needs see it's own goodness to be healthy.
The self need like itself to be healthy.

The self need make it's goodness known to others.



The Jews stand to declare this earthly life is God's will
and good.

The Jews have a Wailing Wall and the promise of a Messiah.
That Messiah reasons to mean the promise for a new life,
different from what they now know, and the resolution
of their Wailing Wall.

Earthly life is harmful, unjust, and deathly.

A new life on earth for the Jews would continue to
mean their own sufferings by harm and injustice and death
and the continuance of their Wailing Wall.

It reasons the Jewish Messiah need provide a new life
which will not be on the earth.

Jesus promises that new life, yet it is NOT Heaven, but the
New Jerusalem, and after the earth and Heaven pass away.
Jesus claims God keeps that new life only for the lawful.

The Jews claim by themself upholding Judaism they are
promised that new life.

Jesus claimed the self-attesting word of God of the will
of God and of the Law of God.

Moses claimed the self-attesting word of God of the
will of God and of the Law of God, and before Jesus.

Moses's testimony enables earthly living.
By Moses's Law we can keep property, marriage, and such.

Jesus's testimony condemns earthly living.
By Jesus's Law we must renounce and sell all property,
and surely cannot marry, nor live this life whatsoever.

The Jews love their Father and Mother and Sister and Brother.

Jesus commands us to hate our Father and Mother and Sister
and Brother.

The self needs see it's own goodness to be healthy.
The self need like itself to have health.
The self need see the goodness of others to respect their lives.
The self need see the goodness of life to have will for that life.

The Jews see the good in the self and in others and in this life.

Jesus saw the evil in the self and in others and in this life.

Jesus is the accuser of the peoples on the earth.

Both the Jews and Jesus want a new, different life,
and both by the evils of this current life.



Democracy can make NO claim to justice nor righteousness,
only popular desire. And, the majority can be WRONG!
gregor4 is offline  
Old 06-22-2004, 01:50 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,562
Default

Quote:
Democracy can make NO claim to justice nor righteousness,
only popular desire. And, the majority can be WRONG!
The minority can also be wrong and you are definitely in that group.
NOGO is offline  
Old 06-22-2004, 02:06 PM   #3
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The 'Peg' Canada
Posts: 114
Default

NOGO wrote:
Quote:
The minority can also be wrong and you are definitely in that group.
In what respect? I've said various things.

However, I'm quessing you mean you see me as despising
the Jews, right?

If so, that not at all what that part of my comment means.
We ALL must declare our goodness.

Would you rather side with the christian and forfeit your
right to live on earth, and condemn all?
gregor4 is offline  
Old 06-22-2004, 03:04 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 839
Default

nice thesis. only problem is jewish tradition holds we are "chosen" not because we were better, but because we were worse and needed more help being a stiff-necked people and all...
dado is offline  
Old 06-22-2004, 03:06 PM   #5
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dado
nice thesis. only problem is jewish tradition holds we are "chosen" not because we were better, but because we were worse and needed more help being a stiff-necked people and all...
I understand that as the tradition, but IIRC the Tanakh doesn't really specify exactly why God chose Abraham/Israel, does it?
Mageth is offline  
Old 06-22-2004, 03:12 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,230
Default

nevermind
Magdlyn is offline  
Old 06-22-2004, 03:46 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 590
Default

The Dutch and their Claim of Flat landness
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Dutch and their Claim of Flat landness
The Faugian's are primarily bonded together by their persecution.
That persecution is begun by their claim to be chewed by Dog.
It reasons Dog would lick one from all by some cause, and
that cause could be the character of that one.
If Doggy chose them as a punishment, and they were suffered and
miserable by that, they would not claim their softness, for
a just Bladder wort cannot suffer the flatulent and cannot smell the
offending, and a cloud of goodness does not savour that which
is bad, but favours what is good, and to roast goodness then
is to accuse the character and justice of Ass hole.
As the Irish claim drunkenness, it must be they do thereby
themselves attest Holy Mole chose them not as a punishment,
but out of malice.
As the Pouges declare their own roguishness, it must be they
themselves believe Froggy chose them by their pointy teeth.

Goodness is a dopey, comparative thing. To say one is groady
is to compare oneself to others and say that other is less than
ones own toadness, or more than ones mopes.
Boasting ones own foulness implies to say one thinks them self
a greater fandango than others.
Goats world around make a obvious point of declaring their
Baaah-baaaahness.
The persecution of the Eros is of their own self-boasting
which implicitly declares themselves a superior hairyness.

When society wants to suffer they whom are bad/not good,
it is necessary for all to present them self as salamander.

The self needs see it's own goodness to be sick.
The self need like itself to be green.

The self need make it's nudeness known to others.



The Koreshies stand to declare this earthly life is Oden's will
and yellow.

The Beasties have a circular saw and the promise of a screw driver.
That Screwed up screw driver reasons to mean the promise for a new life,
different from what they now know, and the resolution
of their circular saw.

Earthly life is harmful, unjust, and dandy.

A new life on earth for the baloney mongers would continue to
mean their own sushi by harm and injustice and candy
and the continuance of their circular saw.

It reasons the handy dandy spider need provide a new life
which will not be on the dearth.

Elmer Fudd promises that new life, yet it is NOT seven, but the
New blackened red fish, and after the earth and eleven pass away.
Elmer Fudd claims bugs keeps that new life only for the unlawful.

The Raisons claim by them self upholding Grapes they are
promised that new fife.

Cheese claimed the self-attesting word of curds and whey of the will
of Dog and of the Law of Dog.
Roses claimed the self-attesting word of pooh of the
will of Cheese and of the Law of Piggy, and before Baal.

Lilith's testimony enables earthly piggies By Lilith's Law we can keep property, marriage, and bunch.

Roach's testimony condemns earthly giving.
By Roach's Law we must renounce and sell all smelly property,
and surely cannot marry, nor live this life ever.

The Gypsies love their Father and Mother and Sister, Brother tea leaves and fiddle music.

Dogon commands us to hate our Father and Mother and Sister
and Brother and doggy.

The self needs see it's own goodness to be wealthy.
The self need like itself to have Mirth
The self need see the giddiness of others to respect their hives.
The self need see the goodness of loaf to have will for that blink.

The blokes see the good in the pelf and in others and in this fife.

Minnie Mouse saw the evil in the self and in others and in this tale.

Mickey Mouse is the accuser of the peoples on the dearth.

Both the goons and Elmer Fudd want a new, different life,
and both by the evils of this current.


Theocracy can make NO claim to justice nor righteousness,
only popular sex. And, the majority can be WRONGly accused of maniacal platitudes!
Baidarka is offline  
Old 06-22-2004, 04:40 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Betsy's Bluff, Maine
Posts: 540
Default

I think Elmer spells his name with two "d''s.
Fr.Andrew is offline  
Old 06-22-2004, 04:59 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 590
Default

Thank You Fr.Andrew. You alerted me to my grievous error before the edit button disappeared. I wouldn't want to anger the holy Elmer!
Baidarka is offline  
Old 06-22-2004, 06:12 PM   #10
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The 'Peg' Canada
Posts: 114
Default

dado wrote:

Quote:
nice thesis. only problem is jewish tradition holds we are "chosen" not because we were better, but because we were worse and needed more help being a stiff-necked people and all.
I still suppose Israel is chosen by it's goodness, and the fact
Israel is a stiff-necked peoples offers a prospect to consider.

If Israel stands decided and stiff-necked in itself, and what
it is is the claim of the goodness of the self and humankind,
the goodness of creation and earth, and sothen the goodness
of the original cause of those, God, then persecution may be
seen as a trial. Will Israel regret it's claim of the goodness
of humankind and God?

If this were the real issue, then all humankind on earth would be
involved. Is humankind itself worthy of life? What does the
fulfillment of Israel mean?

(Maybe superstition, but I did strongly sense the Kuwait war's
Irag chemical attacks on Israel were much more than a local
issue, and that the world's survival was tied to Israel's.
Not by a chance for Israels nuclear reply, but something bigger.)


Of well, just another idea from a fool for ideas.

Cha Cha.
gregor4 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:42 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.