FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-11-2011, 03:45 PM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 1,305
Default

Not forgetting that there is a difference between 'getting killed' and 'being crucified'.

When 'Paul' says something is a stumbling block, might 'he' mean the latter, especially?

Just a thought.

I do tend to accept that there is evidence that at least some Jews already had ideas about a dying messiah before Jesus.
archibald is offline  
Old 10-12-2011, 08:55 AM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 3,210
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by archibald View Post
Not forgetting that there is a difference between 'getting killed' and 'being crucified'.

When 'Paul' says something is a stumbling block, might 'he' mean the latter, especially?
Carrier talks about that - in fact, it seems that the general idea at the time amongst ordinary Jews (not those with a stake in the system obviously) would have been that the more humiliating the death suffered by the "just man", the more their anger would be directed against the authorities, and the more the just man's righteousness would shine.

As Carrier points out, what he's talking about there could fit with an HJ or an MJ position, but I like the way it would fit with my particular MJ theory (but I won't lead the thread astray with that ).

Of particular note, I think, is Carrier's discussion of the "Joshua Messiah"s (i.e. Jesus Christs) in Josephus (i.e. revolutionaries/crackpots mimicking various aspects of the OT Jesus' (i.e. Joshua's) triumphs and gathering people to them, in a way that the Roman authorities understood as provocative).

I've often thought that if there was a "historical Jesus", surely he's just one of those agitators mentioned by Josephus?

IOW, if the TF is bogus, that only leaves whatever is attested in Josephus as providing any kind of decent triangulation for a human being "Joshua Messiah" candidate. Well, if the "HJ" was a failed revolutionary, why can't he just have been one of those failed revolutionaries?

Then, look in the cult texts, and see if there are any little bits of human-sounding biography that might fit with the Josephus biographies.

More mileage in that than in anything else in the HJ line, IMHO.
gurugeorge is offline  
Old 10-12-2011, 10:48 PM   #23
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MCalavera View Post
Why must every amateur think they're more qualified than scholars to notice things supposedly missed by the experts? :huh:
You should know that it is NOT necessary to be an expert to present evidence.

In both gMatthew and gMark the character called Jesus Christ was UNKNOWN to the Jews as a Messiah.

In fact, in gMatthew, the author claimed Herod KILLED all the children 2 years and younger to eliminate the one who was to be born "King of the Jews".

Based on the Jesus stories in gMatthew and gMark Jesus would be like a John the baptist or some one of the prophets.

Except for the outrageous implausible miracles which did not happen the Jesus of gMark and gMatthew simply lived and died in disgrace as a deceiver and a blasphemer.
aa5874 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:50 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.