Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
06-09-2004, 01:13 AM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: In the darkest depths of the lowest hell one could possibly imagine
Posts: 58
|
Books on Paul
I noticed that in BC&H Recommended Reading & Reference under the section for the New Testament, there are no books that deal specifically with Paul. Since he was a major player in the spreading of Christianity throughout the ancient world, I was wondering if may have been an oversight. Can anyone recommend a good starting point for this area of study. I have done a search at amazon under the subject, but it seems there are probably just as many books about him as there are on Christ and its hard to tell which ones are worth a read and which are just a waste of space on my bookshelf.
|
06-09-2004, 03:30 AM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 1,708
|
I only own two books exclusively dealing with Paul... but I recommend both of them. They are:
Paul: The Mind of the Apostle by A. N. Wilson and the excellent The Mythmaker: Paul and the Invention of Christianity by Hyam Maccoby Mods, I listed Maccoby's book under Barnes and Noble's URL since they have a great deal and Amazon shows it out of print. |
06-09-2004, 10:44 AM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,230
|
While The Mythmaker is interesting, I find it depends too much on the assumption of the historicity of the Acts of the Apostles.
I highly rec chapter 8 of The Jesus Mysteries, "Was Paul a Gnostic?" Makes more sense than AofA interpretations of his message and mission. http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0609...38#reader-page |
06-09-2004, 11:31 AM | #4 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
The Jesus Mysteries
For an alternative view of Paul, I recommend The Fabrication of the Christ Myth. I also recommend that you read this thread: Interpolations in the Pauline Epistles, to see how insecure any conclusions about Paul must be. Most scholarship on Paul assumes that the letters we have are basically as Paul wrote them, and that Acts has some historical value. Neither of these propositions is supportable. |
06-09-2004, 02:39 PM | #5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: In the darkest depths of the lowest hell one could possibly imagine
Posts: 58
|
I was at B. Dalton yesterday and happened to run across a book entitled "The Gospel According to Paul." Anybody read this book yet to see if its worth the time.
I would hyperlink it, but I don't know how. sorry The Gospel According to Paul edited to add hyperlink edited to correct URL to refer to internetinfidels |
06-09-2004, 03:06 PM | #6 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Gospel According to Paul
editorial review on Amazon: Quote:
|
|
06-09-2004, 03:10 PM | #7 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: In the darkest depths of the lowest hell one could possibly imagine
Posts: 58
|
Thanks, Toto. Glad I didn't waste my money. :notworthy :notworthy
|
06-10-2004, 09:36 AM | #8 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: On the mat, by the fireside!
Posts: 79
|
There is also Hyam Maccoby's other excellent book on Paul - 'Paul and Hellenism'.
|
06-10-2004, 05:32 PM | #9 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Quote:
|
|
06-11-2004, 10:45 AM | #10 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,230
|
Toto, I enjoyed the article you linked. Excellent companion to the Paul chapter in The Jesus Mysteries.
In the recent conversation about Paul on another thread, a poster claimed Paul could not have been a Gnostic b/c it hadn't been invented yet. Obviously this article shows it was a concept in Paganism already. Perhaps "classical" Gnosticism had not come to the fore yet, ie: Valentinus, Mani et al. But we need not define it so narrowly, IMO. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|