Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-04-2006, 12:03 PM | #111 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Court of the Weirdo King
Posts: 8,818
|
Quote:
OK. I think I'll go with the Catechism for the Church's opinions on these matters. Quote:
Your statements are in conflict with the Catechism. |
||
07-04-2006, 12:03 PM | #112 |
Contributor
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 24,524
|
Fascism is subjugation of self to state, rather than to God; it is idolatry.
|
07-04-2006, 12:06 PM | #113 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Court of the Weirdo King
Posts: 8,818
|
Quote:
Idolatry not only refers to false pagan worship. It remains a constant temptation to faith. Idolatry consists in divinizing what is not God. Man commits idolatry whenever he honors and reveres a creature in place of God, whether this be gods or demons (for example, satanism), power, pleasure, race, ancestors, the state, money, etc. Jesus says, "You cannot serve God and mammon." Many martyrs died for not adoring "the Beast" refusing even to simulate such worship. Idolatry rejects the unique Lordship of God; it is therefore incompatible with communion with God. |
|
07-04-2006, 12:08 PM | #114 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Louisiana, United States
Posts: 475
|
Quote:
You are creating a false dichotomy. It is the subjugating of self to state, that in doing so, you may achieve something higher. It is the destruction of one's ego for the sake of reaching the higher aims as a collective whole. It is a false dillema that one must be subject to God or the state. The fact of the matter is that, in a Democratic Society, people, because the State has so little power, won't be willing to subject themselves to God either. Fascism is a means to an end. |
|
07-04-2006, 12:09 PM | #115 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Louisiana, United States
Posts: 475
|
Quote:
Fascism is a means to an end. The end is very good, and the means is not morally abhorrant. |
|
07-04-2006, 12:10 PM | #116 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wales
Posts: 11,620
|
Quote:
David B (disputes the first two premises, and hopes the third never comes about again) In the West, that is - I suppose there are some states where the church is the state - but these are Islamic states rather than christian ones. |
|
07-04-2006, 12:12 PM | #117 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Louisiana, United States
Posts: 475
|
Quote:
|
|
07-04-2006, 12:15 PM | #118 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Court of the Weirdo King
Posts: 8,818
|
Quote:
|
|
07-04-2006, 12:24 PM | #119 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: California
Posts: 18,543
|
Quote:
|
|
07-04-2006, 12:33 PM | #120 | ||||
Contributor
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 24,524
|
Quote:
Quote:
You are emphasizing and reasserting, over and over, blatant idolatry; you are ascribing to the state a unique quality of God. The statement "by subjugating self to X, you achieve something higher" is absolutely false unless X is "God". Quote:
Quote:
You are doing in reality exactly that thing which the Protestants often mistakenly believe Catholics do. Catholics, while they obey the church, obey it because this is how they feel they can best obey God. Your proposed "state" is not God, nor God's representative. It is precisely that thing which the Church stands in despite of. You are well past mere schism to idolatry, and in practice blasphemy. You reject both the theology and the practical reality of the Christian life. You would come closer to God if you rejected Christianity entirely, because at least then your descriptions of your beliefs would be truthful and consistent, and truth and consistency would be one tiny baby step towards God. |
||||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|