FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Elsewhere > ~Elsewhere~
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-04-2006, 12:03 PM   #111
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Court of the Weirdo King
Posts: 8,818
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Apologist
You, sir, are confusing Church teaching with the Americanist Heresy.

Wikipedia excerpt.
Wikipedia? On heresy? Especially on a made-up one?

OK. I think I'll go with the Catechism for the Church's opinions on these matters.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Apologist
You are confusing God given rights with the usurped liscence which people claim as their own in the United States. Liberalism, individualism, seperation of church and state and so forth and so on are not human rights. What are human rights?

The Church teaches we have the right to Freedom. What is the Church's definition of Freedom? We have the right to tend towards the Good. What is the Good? God is Good. If what we desire tend towards obedience to God's laws and the teachings of the Church, then we are free to pursue it. If not, then it is liscence, not freedom, to go after it.
Granting this arguendo, this is not the position you have advocated. You have advocated that the State has all rights and may on occasion allow the human person to exercise those rights.

Your statements are in conflict with the Catechism.
rigorist is offline  
Old 07-04-2006, 12:03 PM   #112
Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 24,524
Default

Fascism is subjugation of self to state, rather than to God; it is idolatry.
seebs is offline  
Old 07-04-2006, 12:06 PM   #113
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Court of the Weirdo King
Posts: 8,818
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by seebs
Fascism is subjugation of self to state, rather than to God; it is idolatry.
Catechism ΒΆ 2113:
Idolatry not only refers to false pagan worship. It remains a constant temptation to faith. Idolatry consists in divinizing what is not God. Man commits idolatry whenever he honors and reveres a creature in place of God, whether this be gods or demons (for example, satanism), power, pleasure, race, ancestors, the state, money, etc. Jesus says, "You cannot serve God and mammon." Many martyrs died for not adoring "the Beast" refusing even to simulate such worship. Idolatry rejects the unique Lordship of God; it is therefore incompatible with communion with God.
rigorist is offline  
Old 07-04-2006, 12:08 PM   #114
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Louisiana, United States
Posts: 475
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by seebs
Fascism is subjugation of self to state, rather than to God; it is idolatry.
The same arguments have been used by Protestants against Catholics. "You are subjugating yourselfs to the Church rather than God. It is idolotry." No. You are wrong.

You are creating a false dichotomy. It is the subjugating of self to state, that in doing so, you may achieve something higher. It is the destruction of one's ego for the sake of reaching the higher aims as a collective whole.

It is a false dillema that one must be subject to God or the state. The fact of the matter is that, in a Democratic Society, people, because the State has so little power, won't be willing to subject themselves to God either.

Fascism is a means to an end.
Apologist is offline  
Old 07-04-2006, 12:09 PM   #115
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Louisiana, United States
Posts: 475
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rigorist
Granting this arguendo, this is not the position you have advocated. You have advocated that the State has all rights and may on occasion allow the human person to exercise those rights.
I am saying that you are creating a straw man argument. What rights? The only right we have is to Christian freedom. Fascism doesn't contradict that.

Fascism is a means to an end. The end is very good, and the means is not morally abhorrant.
Apologist is offline  
Old 07-04-2006, 12:10 PM   #116
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wales
Posts: 11,620
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by seebs
Fascism is subjugation of self to state, rather than to God; it is idolatry.
But if there really were a god, and the church really represents said god, and the church is the state, is it still idolatry?

David B (disputes the first two premises, and hopes the third never comes about again)

In the West, that is - I suppose there are some states where the church is the state - but these are Islamic states rather than christian ones.
David B is offline  
Old 07-04-2006, 12:12 PM   #117
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Louisiana, United States
Posts: 475
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David B
But if there really were a god, and the church really represents said god, and the church is the state, is it still idolatry?

David B (disputes the first two premises, and hopes the third never comes about again)
That's more or less what I am saying. It is only idolatry when the State intrinsically opposes the Church and God. Fascism doesnt' necessarily do so.
Apologist is offline  
Old 07-04-2006, 12:15 PM   #118
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Court of the Weirdo King
Posts: 8,818
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Apologist
That's more or less what I am saying. It is only idolatry when the State intrinsically opposes the Church and God. Fascism doesnt' necessarily do so.
That is not what the Catechism says.
rigorist is offline  
Old 07-04-2006, 12:24 PM   #119
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: California
Posts: 18,543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David B
So what makes you think that infinite regression is impossible?

Does it not follow from what you say that the first cause is uncaused? If not, what?

If so, what makes you think that a being powerful enough to create everything could be uncaused?

If you read the bible, does not the Abrahamic god sound a lot like a primitive tribal war god?

That will do for now.

I await your answers with interest.

David B

David B
Apologist, you've posted at least 3 times since David B put this up. You planning on responding?
Smullyan-esque is offline  
Old 07-04-2006, 12:33 PM   #120
Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 24,524
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Apologist
The same arguments have been used by Protestants against Catholics. "You are subjugating yourselfs to the Church rather than God. It is idolotry." No. You are wrong.
No, I'm not.

Quote:
You are creating a false dichotomy. It is the subjugating of self to state, that in doing so, you may achieve something higher. It is the destruction of one's ego for the sake of reaching the higher aims as a collective whole.
Except that the thing higher you achieve is absolutely mutually exclusive with salvation.

You are emphasizing and reasserting, over and over, blatant idolatry; you are ascribing to the state a unique quality of God. The statement "by subjugating self to X, you achieve something higher" is absolutely false unless X is "God".

Quote:
It is a false dillema that one must be subject to God or the state. The fact of the matter is that, in a Democratic Society, people, because the State has so little power, won't be willing to subject themselves to God either.
This is a sort of psychotic episode floating in the vicinity of the slippery slope argument, but without its essential plausibility.

Quote:
Fascism is a means to an end.
Yes. The end is the power of the state as a surrogate for God, and like any surrogate for God, it cannot provide. The state cannot save your soul, and if you subjugate yourself entirely to the state, you have nothing left to give God.

You are doing in reality exactly that thing which the Protestants often mistakenly believe Catholics do. Catholics, while they obey the church, obey it because this is how they feel they can best obey God. Your proposed "state" is not God, nor God's representative. It is precisely that thing which the Church stands in despite of.

You are well past mere schism to idolatry, and in practice blasphemy. You reject both the theology and the practical reality of the Christian life. You would come closer to God if you rejected Christianity entirely, because at least then your descriptions of your beliefs would be truthful and consistent, and truth and consistency would be one tiny baby step towards God.
seebs is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:12 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.