Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-03-2013, 11:01 PM | #1 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Circumcision and monotheism
Has anyone asked if there are any correlations? Might circumcision be a necessary factor in getting people to be monotheistic?
Why does Paul go on about it? Why was it really such an important point in the New Testament? I had not realised, for example, that Hadrian had banned it..... |
03-04-2013, 01:33 AM | #2 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
I think circumcision was practiced by the Egyptians, who were not monotheists.
|
03-05-2013, 12:51 AM | #3 |
Obsessed Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 61,538
|
The Egyptians were occasional monotheists and I believe the Jews copied circumcision from the Egyptians (or at least from Africans).
|
03-05-2013, 02:24 AM | #4 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Finland
Posts: 314
|
Quote:
Circumcision was widely practiced in the middle east and northeast Africa in antiquity. It is very possible the Jews didn't copy it from the Egyptians, but that both inherited it from a shared ancestor. Of course, it's possible the influence of Egypt ensured that nearby afro-asiatic tribes kept up the practice as well. The existence of Christianity, Sikhism and Zoroastrism - three monotheistic religions that generally don't practice circumcision is also kind of relevant here. If those three could exist without circumcision, then it's clear there's no reason to assume monotheism only can thrive with circumcision. |
|
03-05-2013, 03:39 AM | #5 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
And all three need looking at in detail. Xianity and Sikhism are both reactions to other stuff, xianity had a real debate about it. Sikhism similarly is a reaction to Islam, Xianity, Hinduism and Buddhism.
Xianity is probably only anti circumcision because the Romans and Greeks were. The interesting question is why Islam went for it, when it obviously has strong Persian roots. Quote:
|
|
03-05-2013, 03:47 AM | #6 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Might any correlation be with fundamentalist attitudes?
|
03-05-2013, 06:55 AM | #7 |
Talk Freethought Staff
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Deep South, USA
Posts: 7,568
|
Of course. Cutting the foreskin off of an infant's penis narrows the mind.
It has been seen in many instances, a new religion co-opts and assumes the culture and its traditions. Circumcision has been practiced in the middle east for untold generations before the Tribes if Israel assumed their identity. It's the sort of thing that requires a serious emotional investment. Once it is a solid cultural tradition, it will not be easily relinquished. |
03-05-2013, 09:50 AM | #8 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Finland
Posts: 314
|
The spread of Christianity mainly appeared after circumcision had widely been rejected, though. Most converts to Christianity did not convert to it in order to take a stand against Judaism.
|
03-05-2013, 10:35 AM | #9 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Quote:
|
|
03-05-2013, 11:53 AM | #10 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 9,233
|
Quote:
The fact is, adults simply enjoy doing such things to the young---always justifying it on some other basis, of course. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|