Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-30-2012, 01:10 PM | #1 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Acts of Mark
Rene Salm has just uploaded the first English translation of the first five chapters of this obscure non-canonical work.
Main page: http://www.renesalm.com/mp Translation Notes from Rene Salm |
01-30-2012, 01:14 PM | #2 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
It is interesting to note some of the parallels with the Letter to Theodore:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
01-30-2012, 02:12 PM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
|
The dryness of the 'Martyrium Marci' just discussed evidently stimulated the
emergence of new' Acts', in which other sources have been worked in alongside the latter document. Among them is in the first place the.... (BHG II, 1036m), which was edited for the first time after a Greek codex from the Stavronikita monastery on Mt Athos (13th cent.) by F. Halkin (AnalBoll 87,1969,346-371). What is striking is above all the verbose and rhetorical style of this extensive document, in contrast to the rather prosaic language of most later apostolic Acts. A large part of its contents (cc. 16-35; Halkin 358-371) is a long-winded paraphrase, enriched with additional teratological material, of the Martyrium aheady mentioned. The remains contain numerous statements about Mark's life before his mission in Egypt. Some such details - e.g. Mark as a disciple of John the Baptist (c. 5), as a Levite (c. 2), at his baptism by Peter (c. 4) and as author of the Gospel in Rome (c. 9) - are known especially through the Gospel prologues and arguments (on which see J. Regul, Die antimarcionitischen Evangelienprologe, 1969.30; 47-5O) and in part go to an ancient interpretation of specific biblical passages (e.g. Acts 4:36 and 1 Peter 5:13). The statements about Mark's relations with his mother Mary (c. 4) and with Paul and Barnabas (c. 6) derive mainly from Acts (12:12; 13:5-14), the conflict between Paul and Bamabas because of Mark theree mentioned (Acts 15:37-39) being passed over in silence. F. Halkin (art. cit. 345.354) sees a clear indication of the use of the Acta Barnabae by the author of the present document in the description of Mark's stay on the island of Pityusa ... A further pointer in the same direction is provided by the enigmatic statement of c. 8 about Mark's intention of going 'to the west, to the Gauls'; the counterpart to that is in c. 5 of the Acts of Barnabas ... |
01-30-2012, 02:31 PM | #4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
I know that Tjitze Baarda has a monograph finished on the Martyrium Marci
|
01-30-2012, 04:10 PM | #5 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
|
Salm regards as unusual the idea in the Acts of Mark that Mark was a Levite. However, this is found in other sources, eg the latin prologues
Quote:
Andrew Criddle Edited to Add Roger Pearse posted a similar comment earlier. |
|
01-30-2012, 04:19 PM | #6 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
|
||
01-30-2012, 04:21 PM | #7 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
01-30-2012, 04:32 PM | #8 | ||||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
Quote:
Quote:
The trinity reference seems to confirm a post-Nicaean authorship. The Gnostic speaks like a Plotinic Platonist - not a Canonical Christian. These Gnostics must have had a great collection of Gospels and Acts. Here Mark is not sent to Alexandria but to Gaul, the homeland of Irenaeus, and some of Constantine's barbarian chieftans. Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
01-30-2012, 04:53 PM | #9 | |||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
Quote:
The gnostic author data-mined and cobbled together a bit of this and a bit of that canonical text, a bit of this and that non canonical text, and then sprinkled in things new. This was the standard modus operandi of these vile gnostic heretics. How could they have thought to do this? Why would they have thought to do this? They were deliberately cloning the One True Official SuperMark Story. There was an opening - an unofficial window of opportunity - for an Act of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. |
|||
01-30-2012, 04:59 PM | #10 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
|
The narrative doesn't sound like high christology at all yet Jesus is called both begotten son of God and the creator God during his lifetime. It sounds like a mishmash like Toldoth Yeshu.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|