FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-30-2012, 01:10 PM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default Acts of Mark

Rene Salm has just uploaded the first English translation of the first five chapters of this obscure non-canonical work.

Main page: http://www.renesalm.com/mp

Translation

Notes from Rene Salm
Toto is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 01:14 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

It is interesting to note some of the parallels with the Letter to Theodore:

Quote:
So from this and from his [Mark's] virtuous way of living, the people called this man mystery speaker [mystolektês] and holy herald [hierokêroux].
The following idea is standard throughout the literature associated with the apostle:

Quote:
Now at first this blessed apostle was called John. But when he received the washing of renewal from Peter the divine and venerable leader, he was renamed Mark and bore the title [exrêmatisen] of an adopted son. And Mary, the mother of the blessed apostle Mark, had converted [metêrxeto] to a sober and God-loving life.
Yet notice how controversial the idea of Mark being an apostle is outside of Egypt. The idea that his mother was named Mary is also common to the tradition. Rene should translate the Hymns of St Mark by Severus in Arabic.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 02:12 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

The dryness of the 'Martyrium Marci' just discussed evidently stimulated the
emergence of new' Acts', in which other sources have been worked in alongside the latter document.

Among them is in the first place the.... (BHG II, 1036m), which was edited for the first time after a Greek codex from the Stavronikita monastery on Mt Athos (13th cent.) by F. Halkin (AnalBoll 87,1969,346-371). What is striking is above all the verbose and rhetorical style of this extensive document, in contrast to the rather prosaic language of most later apostolic Acts. A large part of its contents (cc. 16-35; Halkin 358-371) is a long-winded paraphrase, enriched with additional teratological material, of the Martyrium aheady mentioned. The remains contain numerous statements about Mark's life before his mission in Egypt. Some such details - e.g. Mark as a disciple of John the Baptist (c. 5), as a Levite (c. 2), at his baptism by Peter (c. 4) and as author of the Gospel in Rome (c. 9) - are known especially through the Gospel prologues and arguments (on which see J. Regul, Die antimarcionitischen Evangelienprologe, 1969.30; 47-5O) and in part go to an ancient interpretation
of specific biblical passages (e.g. Acts 4:36 and 1 Peter 5:13). The statements about Mark's relations with his mother Mary (c. 4) and with Paul and Barnabas (c. 6) derive mainly from Acts (12:12; 13:5-14), the conflict between Paul and Bamabas because of Mark theree mentioned (Acts 15:37-39) being passed over in silence. F. Halkin (art. cit. 345.354) sees a clear indication of the use of the Acta Barnabae by the author of the present document in the description of Mark's stay on the island of Pityusa ... A further pointer in the same direction is provided by the enigmatic statement of c. 8 about Mark's intention of going 'to the west, to the Gauls'; the counterpart to that is in c. 5 of the Acts of Barnabas ...
Roger Pearse is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 02:31 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

I know that Tjitze Baarda has a monograph finished on the Martyrium Marci
stephan huller is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 04:10 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Salm regards as unusual the idea in the Acts of Mark that Mark was a Levite. However, this is found in other sources, eg the latin prologues
Quote:
Mark, the evangelist of God and in baptism the son of the blessed apostle Peter and also his disciple in the divine word, performing the priesthood in Israel, a Levite according to the flesh, but converted to the faith of Christ,
This tradition is possibly related to Mark being described as the cousin of Barnabas who was a Levite.

Andrew Criddle

Edited to Add

Roger Pearse posted a similar comment earlier.
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 04:19 PM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle View Post
Salm regards as unusual the idea in the Acts of Mark that Mark was a Levite. However, this is found in other sources, eg the latin prologues
Quote:
Mark, the evangelist of God and in baptism the son of the blessed apostle Peter and also his disciple in the divine word, performing the priesthood in Israel, a Levite according to the flesh, but converted to the faith of Christ,
This tradition is possibly related to Mark being described as the cousin of Barnabas who was a Levite.

Andrew Criddle
Barnabas was a Levite??? Which Barnabas are you talking about? This is like asserting that Robin Hood was a Jew.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 04:21 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle View Post
Salm regards as unusual the idea in the Acts of Mark that Mark was a Levite. However, this is found in other sources, eg the latin prologues This tradition is possibly related to Mark being described as the cousin of Barnabas who was a Levite.

Andrew Criddle
Barnabas was a Levite??? Which Barnabas are you talking about? This is like asserting that Robin Hood was a Jew.
Acts 4:36
Quote:
Joseph, a Levite from Cyprus, whom the apostles called Barnabas (which means “son of encouragement”),
Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 04:32 PM   #8
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Rene Salm has just uploaded the first English translation of the first five chapters of this obscure non-canonical work.

Main page: http://www.renesalm.com/mp

Translation


Quote:
So, with the guiding assistance of the all-powerful and essentially unified trinity of the one divinity and [his] realm, emboldened also by acceptable supplication of the God-seeing evangelist for aid, let us begin casting forth [our] expository composition.

The trinity reference seems to confirm a post-Nicaean authorship.

The Gnostic speaks like a Plotinic Platonist - not a Canonical Christian.

These Gnostics must have had a great collection of Gospels and Acts.

Here Mark is not sent to Alexandria but to Gaul, the homeland of Irenaeus, and some of Constantine's barbarian chieftans.






Quote:
Firstly, gnostic vocabulary pervades the Acts of Mark. The apostle brings “the light of the knowledge of god”, “hidden and obscure meanings”, “divine illumination”, and “perfection.” Mark is known as a “speaker of mysteries” (mystolektês). He is “clear-sighted,” and has reached “the highest degree” of excellence/perfection. In short, he appears to be a holy and “enlightened” herald of gnosis.
mountainman is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 04:53 PM   #9
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle View Post
Salm regards as unusual the idea in the Acts of Mark that Mark was a Levite. However, this is found in other sources, eg the latin prologues This tradition is possibly related to Mark being described as the cousin of Barnabas who was a Levite.

Andrew Criddle
Barnabas was a Levite??? Which Barnabas are you talking about? This is like asserting that Robin Hood was a Jew.
Acts 4:36


The gnostic author data-mined and cobbled together a bit of this and a bit of that canonical text, a bit of this and that non canonical text, and then sprinkled in things new. This was the standard modus operandi of these vile gnostic heretics. How could they have thought to do this? Why would they have thought to do this? They were deliberately cloning the One True Official SuperMark Story. There was an opening - an unofficial window of opportunity - for an Act of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.
mountainman is offline  
Old 01-30-2012, 04:59 PM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

The narrative doesn't sound like high christology at all yet Jesus is called both begotten son of God and the creator God during his lifetime. It sounds like a mishmash like Toldoth Yeshu.
Duvduv is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:04 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.