FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-30-2008, 06:18 AM   #581
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Metro Detroit, MI
Posts: 3,201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sschlicter
Is it a double standard in our country that some laws only apply to citizens while others apply only to non-citizens?
What is your position on the hiring of illegal immigrants? If you do not have a position, then neither do I. I am certainly not going to let you ask all of the questions and give no answers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sschlicter
Is it a double standard in our country that some laws only apply to citizens while others apply only to non-citizens. Why do you have to be an immigration attorney to answer that question?
Do you have to be an immigration attorney to state what your position is on the hiring of illegal immigrants? Since I have never studied the pros and cons of hiring illegal immigrants, it would be ridiculous for me to comment on that issue unless I learn more about it. Even if I knew a lot about hiring illegal immigrants, there would be no need for me to state my position before you state your position since you are the one who brought up the issue.
It is illegal to hire illegal aliens. I would not hire someone that is not allowed to work in this country. I have friends that work in this country illegally, just not for me.
sschlichter is offline  
Old 12-30-2008, 06:22 AM   #582
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Metro Detroit, MI
Posts: 3,201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sschlicter
What you are missing is that ethnic and national lines are different in the US where in the ANE an ethnic line is the same as a nationalistic line. The favoritism in the law is to preserve the nation of Israel. Ethnicity is not the issue.
How would granting non-Hebrew slaves the right to gain their freedom have interfered with preserving Israel?
because in 7 years, you would have a growing population of idol worshippers living in your midst.
sschlichter is offline  
Old 12-30-2008, 06:23 AM   #583
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sschlicter
It is illegal to hire illegal aliens. I would not hire someone that is not allowed to work in this country.
Are you saying that it is immoral to hire illegal aliens?
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 12-30-2008, 06:25 AM   #584
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Metro Detroit, MI
Posts: 3,201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sschlicter
It is illegal to hire illegal aliens. I would not hire someone that is not allowed to work in this country.
Are you saying that it is immoral to hire illegal aliens?
No, but I feel it is important to obey the law, if it is not immoral.
sschlichter is offline  
Old 12-30-2008, 06:28 AM   #585
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Metro Detroit, MI
Posts: 3,201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sschlichter View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic View Post

Are you saying that it is immoral to hire illegal aliens?
No, but I feel it is important to obey the law, if it is not immoral.
the point is that there is a different law for different people. You know the reason for this law so it does not seem immoral.

You now know the reason (at least one of them) for the slave law. However, the reason is only compelling for one who knows God. If you do not know God then you do not see the danger of false Gods to the nation of Isreal.
sschlichter is offline  
Old 12-30-2008, 06:36 AM   #586
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sschlicter
What you are missing is that ethnic and national lines are different in the US where in the ANE an ethnic line is the same as a nationalistic line. The favoritism in the law is to preserve the nation of Israel. Ethnicity is not the issue.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
How would granting non-Hebrew slaves the right to gain their freedom have interfered with preserving Israel?
Quote:
Originally Posted by sschlicter
Because in 7 years, you would have a growing population of idol worshippers living in your midst.
How is that? Weren't most non-Hebrew slaves idol worshippers? If so, freeing them would not have increased the number of idol worshippers.

Consider the following Scriptures from the NASB:

Deuteronomy 23:15-16

"You shall not hand over to his master a slave who has escaped from his master to you. He shall live with you in your midst, in the place which he shall choose in one of your towns where it pleases him; you shall not mistreat him."

Does that indicates to you that Hebrews were worried about having a growing population of idol worshippers in their midst?

Moses instructed his soldiers to capture women from a neighboring tribe who had not slept with men and keep them for themselves. Does that indicate to you that he was worried about having more idol worshippers around?
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 12-30-2008, 06:38 AM   #587
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Message to sschlicter: Please reply to my post #578.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 12-30-2008, 06:52 AM   #588
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
Are you saying that it is immoral to hire illegal aliens?
Quote:
Originally Posted by sschlicter
No, but I feel it is important to obey the law, if it is not immoral.
Ok, you believe that is it immoral to hire illegal aliens, and I believe that is was immoral for Old Testament Hebrews to involuntarily force non-Hebrew slaves to be slaves for life.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sschlicter
The point is that there is a different law for different people. You know the reason for this law so it does not seem immoral.
Yes, I know the reason for the law. Hebrews appointed themselves as God's chosen people, and believed that God considered them to be superior to everyone else in the world, and that is was appropriate to abuse inferior ethnic groups of people. Hebrews also believed that practicing the freedom of religion by worshipping other God's deserved the death penalty. You can call all of that moral if you wish, but I don't.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sschlicter
You now know the reason (at least one of them) for the slave law. However, the reason is only compelling for one who knows God. If you do not know God then you do not see the danger of false Gods to the nation of Israel.
If you do not know that the God of the Bible does not exist, then you are the victim of false teachings. It is a virtual given that the claim that a global flood occured is false. If you believe the claim, that is adequate proof that you have abandoned common sense, logic, and reason.

If you had been born in other centuries, it is reasonable to assume that many of your beliefs would be different from what they are now. Chance and cirumstance are the primary or sole factors that influence what people believe, not the God of the Bible.

At the very least, Bible writers did not do people in future centuries any favors regarding their confusing writings about slavery, and many other issues for that matter such as the apparently different accounts of the events at the tomb of Jesus, and the apparently different versions of the death of Judas. Historically, Christians have differed on many important issues. If a God did not inspire the Bible, that explains that. If a God did inspire the Bible, I would like to know why he inspired so many needlessly confusing claims.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 12-30-2008, 08:04 AM   #589
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Metro Detroit, MI
Posts: 3,201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic View Post
Deuteronomy 23:15-16

"You shall not hand over to his master a slave who has escaped from his master to you. He shall live with you in your midst, in the place which he shall choose in one of your towns where it pleases him; you shall not mistreat him."

Does that indicates to you that Hebrews were worried about having a growing population of idol worshippers in their midst?
this is about one runaway slave, not a perpetual flow of freed men and women who were are still addicted to their foreign Gods.

However, that was only one of the reasons. consider if you keep a slave for 7 years in a foreign land and then let them go in a place where they have no family and no means of making a living. They could not hop in a train back to their homeland. They would just have to sell themselves into slavery again.

Quote:
Moses instructed his soldiers to capture women from a neighboring tribe who had not slept with men and keep them for themselves. Does that indicate to you that he was worried about having more idol worshippers around?
yes, because you are not understanding the context and are ignoring the details. They are instructed to shave their heads, which represents a break from their old life and starting a new life. Then they were instructed to take them as a wife, specifically not as a slave.
sschlichter is offline  
Old 12-30-2008, 08:11 AM   #590
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Metro Detroit, MI
Posts: 3,201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
Are you saying that it is immoral to hire illegal aliens?


Ok, you believe that is it immoral to hire illegal aliens, and I believe that is was immoral for Old Testament Hebrews to involuntarily force non-Hebrew slaves to be slaves for life.



Yes, I know the reason for the law. Hebrews appointed themselves as God's chosen people, and believed that God considered them to be superior to everyone else in the world, and that is was appropriate to abuse inferior ethnic groups of people. Hebrews also believed that practicing the freedom of religion by worshipping other God's deserved the death penalty. You can call all of that moral if you wish, but I don't.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sschlicter
You now know the reason (at least one of them) for the slave law. However, the reason is only compelling for one who knows God. If you do not know God then you do not see the danger of false Gods to the nation of Israel.
If you do not know that the God of the Bible does not exist, then you are the victim of false teachings. It is a virtual given that the claim that a global flood occured is false. If you believe the claim, that is adequate proof that you have abandoned common sense, logic, and reason.

If you had been born in other centuries, it is reasonable to assume that many of your beliefs would be different from what they are now. Chance and cirumstance are the primary or sole factors that influence what people believe, not the God of the Bible.

At the very least, Bible writers did not do people in future centuries any favors regarding their confusing writings about slavery, and many other issues for that matter such as the apparently different accounts of the events at the tomb of Jesus, and the apparently different versions of the death of Judas. Historically, Christians have differed on many important issues. If a God did not inspire the Bible, that explains that. If a God did inspire the Bible, I would like to know why he inspired so many needlessly confusing claims.

The topic is slavery. If you have exhausted all of your thoughts on slavery then start another thread on the flood, harmony of Judas' death, or the doctrine of inspiration.

Do you feel that all laws that differentiate between citizens and non-citizens are immoral? such as work laws in the US?
sschlichter is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:22 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.