FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-28-2008, 05:48 PM   #1
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Posts: 234
Default Manesseh and Caananite Ritual Child Sacrifice

While reading up on the OT treatment of the Canaanite practices of child sacrifice, I stumbled on the story of Manesseh in 2 Chronicles. I am trying to get my head around the implications of the story, and wondered if anyone here could help.

According to Chronicles Manesseh did not start out as much of a model king;

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2 Chronicle 33
1 Manasseh was twelve years old when he became king, and he reigned in Jerusalem for fifty-five years.
2 He did evil in the eyes of the LORD, following the detestable practices of the nations the LORD had driven out before the Israelites.
3 He rebuilt the high places his father Hezekiah had demolished; he also erected altars to the Baals and made Asherah poles. He bowed down to all the starry hosts and worshipped them.
4 He built altars in the temple of the LORD, of which the LORD had said, My Name will remain in Jerusalem for ever.
5 In both courts of the temple of the LORD, he built altars to all the starry hosts.
6 He sacrificed his sons in the fire in the Valley of Ben Hinnom, practised sorcery, divination and witchcraft, and consulted mediums and spiritists. He did much evil in the eyes of the LORD, provoking him to anger
So the OT reports that Manesseh was sacrificing his children. Then, the Assyrians invade, and take Manesseh prisoner. In captivity he converts;

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2 Chronicle 33
11 In his distress he sought the favour of the LORD his God and humbled himself greatly before the God of his fathers.
13 And when he prayed to him, the LORD was moved by his entreaty and listened to his plea; so he brought him back to Jerusalem and to his kingdom. Then Manasseh knew that the LORD is God
So Manesseh is released, and returns to Jerusalem a reformed man. Chronicles goes onto describe how he has changed for the better;

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2 Chronicle 33
15 He got rid of the foreign gods and removed the image from the temple of the LORD, as well as all the altars he had built on the temple hill and in Jerusalem; and he threw them out of the city.
16 Then he restored the altar of the LORD and sacrificed fellowship offerings and thank- offerings on it, and told Judah to serve the LORD, the God of Israel.
17 The people, however, continued to sacrifice at the high places, but only to the LORD their God
To my eyes, this is suggesting that the child sacrifices continued under Manesseh, but these are now OK, as they were now dedicated to the God of Israel.

Have I got this right? Or perhaps could the term 'sacrifice at the high places' mean sacrifices other than children. If so, what evidence is there of there being other forms of Caananite sacrifice in ‘high places’.

In fact, does anyone here know much about the subject of child sacrifice in Canaan? As far as I can tell, by the time of Josiah in Deuteronomy there appears to be unambiguous condemnation of the practice – however, earlier books seem more ambiguous in their treatment of the subject. Could this change in attitude have been related to the fact that Josiah was writing after the fall of the northern kingdom (where such practices seemed to be more prevalent)?

Any educated help, even a cursory dismissal of my musings would be appreciated.
DNAReplicator is offline  
Old 06-28-2008, 07:38 PM   #2
vid
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Myjava, Slovakia
Posts: 384
Default

Ugaritic texts have shed some light on this:

Quote:
Originally posted by http://www.apologeticspress.org/rr/r...Ras-Shamra.pdf
(1) For years scholars were puzzled by the Mosaic prohibition: “Thou shalt not boil a kid in its mother’s milk” (Exodus 23:19; cf. 34:26; Deuteronomy 14:21). Adam Clarke felt that the design of the commandment was basically to prevent blunting moral sensitivity and developing hardness of heart (n.d., 1:422). It now is known, however, that boiling a kid in milk to appease certain deities was a common Ca- naanite ritual. A Ugaritic text says: “Over the fire seven times the sacrificers cook a kid in milk...” (Driver, 1956, p. 121). The Mosaic regulation, therefore, was to prevent mimicry of heathenism.
Quote:
from numerous biblical and Roman allusions we know that child sacrifice was occasionally practiced, the story of the Moabite king, Mesha (2 Kings 3:27) immediately coming to mind” (Wright, 1962, p. 112) “Funerary jars have been found with the bodies of young children distorted by suffocation as they struggled for life after having been buried alive as a sacrifice to Canaanite gods” (Wilson, 1973, p. 85).
vid is offline  
Old 06-29-2008, 10:25 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: land of the home, free of the brave
Posts: 9,729
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
Ugaritic texts have shed some light on this:

Quote:
Originally posted by http://www.apologeticspress.org/rr/r...Ras-Shamra.pdf
(1) For years scholars were puzzled by the Mosaic prohibition: “Thou shalt not boil a kid in its mother’s milk” (Exodus 23:19; cf. 34:26; Deuteronomy 14:21). Adam Clarke felt that the design of the commandment was basically to prevent blunting moral sensitivity and developing hardness of heart (n.d., 1:422). It now is known, however, that boiling a kid in milk to appease certain deities was a common Ca- naanite ritual. A Ugaritic text says: “Over the fire seven times the sacrificers cook a kid in milk...” (Driver, 1956, p. 121). The Mosaic regulation, therefore, was to prevent mimicry of heathenism.
Quote:
from numerous biblical and Roman allusions we know that child sacrifice was occasionally practiced, the story of the Moabite king, Mesha (2 Kings 3:27) immediately coming to mind” (Wright, 1962, p. 112) “Funerary jars have been found with the bodies of young children distorted by suffocation as they struggled for life after having been buried alive as a sacrifice to Canaanite gods” (Wilson, 1973, p. 85).
Can they actually be certain of death by suffication, having only - perhaps - bones/dried up remains of bodies?
credoconsolans is offline  
Old 06-29-2008, 12:00 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DNAReplicator View Post
To my eyes, this is suggesting that the child sacrifices continued under Manesseh, but these are now OK, as they were now dedicated to the God of Israel.

Have I got this right? Or perhaps could the term 'sacrifice at the high places' mean sacrifices other than children. If so, what evidence is there of there being other forms of Caananite sacrifice in ‘high places’.
Kings and the later Chronicles were written by people who held that sacrifices other than at Jerusalem were wrong in themselves quite apart from whether or not they contained pagan elements. (This position, that there is an appointed place for sacrifice and sacrifice anywhere else is wrong is explicit in the present version of the Torah particularly Deuteronomy).

What the text in Chronicles is claiming is that in the early period of Manasseh sacrifices with pagan elements (such as child sacrifice) were carried out both at Jerusalem and at the various high places. This is regarded as wrong both because of the pagan elements and because sacrifice outside Jerusalem is wrong anyway.

In the late period of Manasseh the text in Chronicles claims that the pagan elements (such as child sacrifice) disappeared but the problem of sacrifice outside Jerusalem at the high places continued.

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:41 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.