FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-27-2007, 06:22 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 976
Default The Delian Problem -- Any Comments?

Doubling the Cube

Doubling the Cube, the most famous of the collection, is often referred to as the Delian problem due to a legend that the Delians had consulted Plato on the subject. In another form, the story asserts that the Athenians in 430 B.C. consulted the oracle at Delos in the hope to stop the plague ravaging their country. They were advised by Apollo to double his altar that had the form of a cube. As a result of several failed attempts to satisfy the god, the pestilence only worsened and at the end they turned to Plato for advice.


Just wanted to see what the skeptics could come up with on this one. Plato was said to have been consulted in 430 BC but he wasn't born until 428BCE. So where does this reference come from? Why don't the dates match?

Any comments? Links to discussion on this?


Thanks.


Larsguy47
Larsguy47 is offline  
Old 03-27-2007, 06:25 PM   #2
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Palm Springs, California
Posts: 10,955
Default

The state of biography in antiquity is in disarray. Virtually everything we know about "famous" figures from Greece reside in mss that are written 1000 years after the events, and involved biased authors. No specific dates about Plato or Socrates or Pericles should be taken seriously.
Gamera is offline  
Old 03-27-2007, 06:32 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 976
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamera View Post
The state of biography in antiquity is in disarray. Virtually everything we know about "famous" figures from Greece reside in mss that are written 1000 years after the events, and involved biased authors. No specific dates about Plato or Socrates or Pericles should be taken seriously.
Thanks for your comment!

Larsguy47
Larsguy47 is offline  
Old 03-27-2007, 06:48 PM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamera View Post
The state of biography in antiquity is in disarray. Virtually everything we know about "famous" figures from Greece reside in mss that are written 1000 years after the events, and involved biased authors. No specific dates about Plato or Socrates or Pericles should be taken seriously.
Did Josephus, Pliny the Elder or Philo write about the Essenes one thousand years afterwards. When was 'The Life of Flavius Josephus' written, one thousand years after Josephus died?

The state of biography in antiquity is NOT in disarray, except perhaps that of Jesus the Christ.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 03-27-2007, 06:52 PM   #5
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New York State
Posts: 440
Default

Traditions about famous figures from centuries later are not considered reliable sources for dating when all the contemporary material contradicts them.
rob117 is offline  
Old 03-27-2007, 07:10 PM   #6
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 10,532
Default

From Larsguy47:
Quote:
Doubling the Cube, the most famous of the collection, is often referred to as the Delian problem due to a legend that the Delians had consulted Plato on the subject. In another form, the story asserts that the Athenians in 430 B.C. consulted the oracle at Delos in the hope to stop the plague ravaging their country. They were advised by Apollo to double his altar that had the form of a cube. As a result of several failed attempts to satisfy the god, the pestilence only worsened and at the end they turned to Plato for advice.

Just wanted to see what the skeptics could come up with on this one. Plato was said to have been consulted in 430 BC but he wasn't born until 428BCE. So where does this reference come from? Why don't the dates match?
The operative word is “legend.”

What is the source of this legend? What is the reliability of the source. The reliability is questionable as it runs up against standard scholarship.

Quote:
It is widely accepted that Plato, the Athenian philosopher, was born in 428-7 B.C.E and died at the age of eighty or eighty-one at 348-7 B.C.E. These dates, however, are not entirely certain, for according to Diogenes Laertius, following Apollodorus' chronology, Plato was born the year Pericles died, was six years younger than Isocrates, and died at the age of eighty-four ( D.L. 3.2-3.3). If Plato's date of death is correct in Apollodorus' version, Plato would have been born in 430 or 431. Diogenes' claim that Plato was born the year Pericles died would put his birth in 429. Later (at 3.6), Diogenes says that Plato was twenty-eight when Socrates was put to death (in 399), which would, again, put his year of birth at 427. In spite of the confusion, the dates of Plato's life we gave above, which are based upon Eratosthenes' calculations, have traditionally been accepted as accurate.
http://www.iep.utm.edu/p/plato.htm#H1

By the way, the source for the Delian Problem legend is Theon of Smyrna, a second-century Platonist.

http://books.google.com/books?id=nMl...3YaEILGdO2mlkI

RED DAVE
RED DAVE is offline  
Old 03-27-2007, 10:07 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 976
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RED DAVE View Post
From Larsguy47:
The operative word is “legend.”

What is the source of this legend? What is the reliability of the source. The reliability is questionable as it runs up against standard scholarship.

http://www.iep.utm.edu/p/plato.htm#H1

By the way, the source for the Delian Problem legend is Theon of Smyrna, a second-century Platonist.

http://books.google.com/books?id=nMl...3YaEILGdO2mlkI

RED DAVE
Thanks, RED DAVE, much appreciated! I found this suspicious from the Encylopaedia Britannica on Plato:

Quote:
Plato's early experiences covred the disastrous years of the Deceleian War, the shattering of the Athenian empire, and the fierce civil strife of oligarchs and democrats in the year of anarchy, 404-403. He was too young to have known antything by epxerience of the impreial democracy of of Pericles and Cleon or of the tide of the Sophistics movement. It is certainly not from memory that he depicted Protagoras, the earliest avowed professional sphist, or Alcibiades, a turncoat Athenian general, as they were in their great days.
Yet if my theory is correct and the Delian Problem is accurage, Plato would have been 26 or 27 when Pericles died, so he would have been able to reflect these things from experience.

Further, you have the claim of Xenophon, who is about Plato's age that he knew Socrates in his youth and indeed was at this famous Symposium. Both Xenophon and Plato write about the Symposium, strangely. But Xenophon claims he was actually present. If so, he would have only been 8 years old, and Plato younger. But if the chronology is correct, they would have been able to both have been there with Socrates only 7 years or less older than the two. Xenophon claims he knew Socrates in his youth.

Both wrote about the Symposium, both preserved the dialogues of Socrates, and Xenophon writes about Persian history. Very suspicious. When the chronology is corrected, of course, both could have been at the Symposium, which is likely whey they both gave their versions of it, pretending not to be there but recording the important event.

Larsguy47
Larsguy47 is offline  
Old 03-27-2007, 10:23 PM   #8
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 10,532
Default

From Larsguy47:
Quote:
Thanks, RED DAVE, much appreciated! I found this suspicious from the Encylopaedia Britannica on Plato:
Quote:
Plato's early experiences covred the disastrous years of the Deceleian War, the shattering of the Athenian empire, and the fierce civil strife of oligarchs and democrats in the year of anarchy, 404-403. He was too young to have known antything by epxerience of the impreial democracy of of Pericles and Cleon or of the tide of the Sophistics movement. It is certainly not from memory that he depicted Protagoras, the earliest avowed professional sphist, or Alcibiades, a turncoat Athenian general, as they were in their great days.
You need to start sourcing your quotes.

From Larsguy47:
Quote:
Yet if my theory is correct and the Delian Problem is accurage, Plato would have been 26 or 27 when Pericles died, so he would have been able to reflect these things from experience.
As quoted above, the Delian problem is based on a single quote two or three hundred years later. It is not a legitimate basis to start revising Greek history.

Quote:
Further, you have the claim of Xenophon, who is about Plato's age that he knew Socrates in his youth and indeed was at this famous Symposium. Both Xenophon and Plato write about the Symposium, strangely. But Xenophon claims he was actually present. If so, he would have only been 8 years old, and Plato younger.
Sorry, dude:

Xenophon – 427-355

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenophon

Xenophon was 28 when Socrates died. I am unaware of any date for the actual Symposium, but this would seem to be an ample overlap.

From Larsguy47:
Quote:
But if the chronology is correct, they would have been able to both have been there with Socrates only 7 years or less older than the two. Xenophon claims he knew Socrates in his youth.
And since he was 28 when Socrates died, he was likely telling the truth.

From Larsguy47:
Quote:
Both wrote about the Symposium, both preserved the dialogues of Socrates, and Xenophon writes about Persian history. Very suspicious. When the chronology is corrected, of course, both could have been at the Symposium, which is likely whey they both gave their versions of it, pretending not to be there but recording the important event.
Plato does not claim to have been at the Symposium.


RED DAVE
RED DAVE is offline  
Old 03-29-2007, 06:06 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Republic and Canton of Geneva
Posts: 5,756
Default

If legend is correct, the Athenians consulted the oracle at Delos in 430BC, who gave them the puzzle. However, it wasn't solved until 350BC by a friend of Plato (Menaechmus).

Can I please have a reference to the claim that Plato was consulted on how to solve the problem immediately (i.e. in 430BC) rather than him working on the problem during his adult life (and then getting pissed off that his friend solved it just before he died)?
post tenebras lux is offline  
Old 03-29-2007, 06:10 PM   #10
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 38
Default

Theon of Smyrna gives no dates to the origin of the problem, and relates it to Delos itself not Athens. There was a well known plaque in Athens in 430 BC, so some decided maybe this is what was referenced, though there is nothing in the text that says the plague was in Athens, or even if so that it was this specific plague, so really the date of origin is pure speculation. Also it doesn't say Plato solved the problem, merely that he articulated what the real problem was. Of course the story could be totally made up, as Theon was not a historian, but a mathematician.

"Eratosthenes, in his work entitled Platonicus relates that, when the god proclaimed to the Delians through the oracle that, in order to get rid of a plague, they should construct an altar double that of the existing one, their craftsmen fell into great perplexity in their efforts to discover how a solid could be made the double of a similar solid; they therefore went to ask Plato about it, and he replied that the oracle meant, not that the god wanted an altar of double the size, but that he wished, in setting them the task, to shame the Greeks for their neglect of mathematics and their contempt of geometry."

Eutocius, in his commentary on Archimedes gives a letter supposedly written by Eratosthenes, gives a mythical origin to the problem of doubling the cube.

"Eratosthenes to King Ptolemy, greetings.
The story goes that one of the ancient tragic poets represented Minos having a tomb built for Glaucus, and that when Minos found that the tomb measured a hundred feet on every side, he said "Too small is the tomb you have marked out as the royal resting place. Let it be twice as large. Without spoiling the form, quickly double each side of the tomb". This was clearly a mistake. For if the sides are doubled the surface is multiplied fourfold and the volume eightfold."

It might help if you read the primary sources for your supposed chronology problems
Pataphysician is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:39 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.