Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
09-26-2011, 04:21 PM | #11 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
But isn't it an already accepted notion that the authors of the Greek new testament canonical books simply data mined the Greek LXX for sayings to be put into the new testament mouth of Jesus and the apostles? This common curse of Jesus is bound to have parallels to other common curses which proliferate the Greek LXX.
According to this source ... Quote:
|
|
09-26-2011, 06:37 PM | #12 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
It is impossible that two people - even two Clements - could have independently constructed the same chain of sayings. Either, as Andrew notes, Clement of A is quoting Clement of R OR they are drawing from the same non-canonical gospel. I haven't double checked his use of Clement of R but my impression was that he usually introduces the material with some preamble (from memory - 'the apostle Clement,' 'the Epistle of the Romans to the Corinthians,' etc.). It all hinges on the citation of Isaiah 52:5. Was there a variant text of Isaiah used by Paul and Clement or is Clement making two back to back references to 'scriptural sources' without identifying them? I find this especially unusual for Clement.
|
09-27-2011, 12:06 PM | #13 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
|
There is another significant synotic type parallel between Clement of Rome and Clement of Alexandria.
Clement to the Corinthians Quote:
Quote:
Andrew Criddle |
||
09-27-2011, 01:45 PM | #14 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
I am actually more intrigued by the previous sentence in the passage from Clement of Rome:
Quote:
|
|
09-27-2011, 02:05 PM | #15 | |||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
I guess I just wonder in the second example brought forward by Andrew, why Clement of Alexandria would cite Clement of Rome at the juncture he does in the Stromata. It is apparent he is talking about how benevolent the Law given to Moses is. Not only does it provide rules for how to deal with slaves (male or female) Clement of A goes on to say.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I am not sure the sense is exactly the same in each text. The focus of Clement of A's material is to demonstrate that Moses was superior to the Greek philosophers. The chapter begins: Quote:
|
|||||
10-10-2011, 12:34 PM | #16 | ||||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
I couldn't help notice this striking parallel between Clement of A and Clement of R which strangely argues AGAINST Clement of A citing directly from Clement of R:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The Hebrew text of Jeremiah 9:23, 24 reads: Quote:
Quote:
It is curious though that Clement of A should be missing a whole line of this peculiar rendering of Jeremiah chapter 9. Any thoughts? |
||||||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|