Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
08-31-2012, 08:27 PM | #1 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Caesar's Messiah now on screen
Events
Quote:
|
|
08-31-2012, 10:43 PM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
I know Blackhirst. We've corresponded. He's an expert on the Gospel of Barnabas.
|
08-31-2012, 10:44 PM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Pacific
Posts: 559
|
Sounds very interesting ....
Quote:
http://caesarsmessiah.com/blog/2012/...siah/#more-195 . |
|
08-31-2012, 10:44 PM | #4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
Eisenmann used to be embarrassed by Atwill. He used to be concerned that Atwill was using his name to promote his book. How time changes our memory ...
|
09-01-2012, 05:54 AM | #5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
|
Toto,
As I remember, the "Los Angeles area" is pretty damn big (I used to live in Silverlake near the park and later next to LAX years ago, as well as for business numerous times since). But if you could catch one of the showings then I for one would be interested in a resume of what was presented. It isn't clear to me how a study of the relationship of the gospels and the DSS and Josephus' War would lead to the conclusion that the Flavians intentionally created Christianity, and left clues to it to boot for the sake of posterity. I can understand someone proposing that Paul was a Herodian "double agent" intent on derailing a world-revolution expecting Jesus movement into a non-threating track as a mystery religion (if so he was ultimately successful). But if the Flavians created Christianity, why did they condemn it and later emperors never exposed this satire to the embarassment of the Christians? DCH |
09-01-2012, 07:21 AM | #6 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,014
|
Hi DCHindley,
I remember reading Atwill's book about 10 years ago. I did not find any of his evidence or arguments substantial. To use a comic book analogy (as I often like to do), it is kind of like believing that the Republican Party created "Batman" to attack Franklin Roosevelt's social welfare programs of the 1930's. The "Batman" comics certainly did have a conservative point of view. it portrays lazy, rich playboys as secretly being dedicated and heroic crime fighters. It does not portray them as being diabolical parasitic exploiters of the working class, stealing and living on the work of others. It portrays criminals, not as poor, ordinary, oppressed people with no options or economic opportunities, but as psychopathic vicious inhuman monsters. It denies that the public government can function well enough to protect people and endorses private secrets actions by the wealthy to bring about a just society. Because this is an ideology that the Republican party endorsed in the 1930's, this does not mean they had a conspiracy to create "Batman," although, it may seem that way. Warmly, Jay Raskin Quote:
|
|
09-01-2012, 01:23 PM | #7 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
|
I do enjoy obvious scams like Atwill's. And they can be really valuable to us. It's an excellent opportunity to work out what is wrong with them; to take two or these of these "what really happened" pieces of doo-doo, and note the commonalities; the contempt for the evidence, except when it suits the theory; the tendency to take a supposition as a proven fact; the selection, omission and misrepresentation; and whatever other things all these theories have.
If we could compile an index of the fallacies, it might be very useful in examining other books of this kind. |
09-01-2012, 03:04 PM | #8 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
The puzzlement for me is that Atwill is a successful retired businessman with an education that allows him to read the original documents, with no particular need that I can see to push this theory.
He has this quote prominently on his webpage: Quote:
|
|
09-01-2012, 03:12 PM | #9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
|
I've seen some extreme Jewish Orthodox anti-Christian groups who come out with material like this. I would guess that Mr Atwill is being influenced from that direction. We're not used to Jewish anti-Christian material; most of the stuff we see is old protestant anti-Catholic material adapted by atheists for anti-Christian use.
|
09-01-2012, 07:00 PM | #10 |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
It must not be forgotten that Josephus did declare that Vespasian was the prophesied Messianic ruler found in Hebrew Scripture and this is corroborated by Tacitus, Suetonius and Cassius Dio.
See Josephus' "Wars of the Jews" 6.5.4, Suetonius' "Life of Vespasian", Tacitus' "Histories" 5, and Cassius Dio's "Roman History". Suentonius did also state that Vespasian performed miracles when he caused a blind man to see using spit and healed the lame by touch. See Suetonius "Life of Vespasian". It is hardly likely that the Jesus cult was started by the very Romans who believed Vespasian and even Titus were prophesied Messianic rulers. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|