Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-15-2004, 12:53 PM | #11 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Re: Re: Romans 14:11
Quote:
|
|
03-15-2004, 12:55 PM | #12 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Quote:
|
|
03-15-2004, 12:57 PM | #13 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Re: Re: Romans 14:11
Originally posted by Grumsh
And if I admit your hair is orange that is infringment of free will? If I'm pointing a gun to you head and saying "Admit that my hair is orange!", yes. As for the Bowing, ever heard of respect? As for tossing most of humanity into Hell for an eternity of suffering for finite and questionable "transgressions" against a deity that they did not bow to (actually, did not believe existed for a large part), ever heard of respect? |
03-15-2004, 12:59 PM | #14 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Re: In Christian belief
Quote:
|
|
03-15-2004, 01:27 PM | #15 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: somewhere out there
Posts: 130
|
I was told that this verse means that all people who denied him would see him in all his glory so that they couldnt deny his existence anymore. Furthermore, he would come with all glory we couldnt imagine that we all automatically would bow down in awe of him. When he did revealed himself, it'd be too late for us to repent. So yes, bye bye Free will.
Of course, this explanation doesn't take his morality into consideration if he's worship-worthy or not, just his physical glory. |
03-15-2004, 01:45 PM | #16 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: North West usa
Posts: 10,245
|
naltariel,
I would say you have a reasonably accurate understanding of the verses. Rather nefarious I would say. Quote:
|
|
03-16-2004, 05:47 AM | #17 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: somewhere out there
Posts: 130
|
Thanks funinspace. I just repeat what's been told to me though. And I did take advance Bible class for a while at the tender age of 14, precocious as I was. Now, I am happily thinking about porn than Bible.
Not that there are many differences between those 2. |
03-16-2004, 06:06 AM | #18 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,230
|
Off topic, but, that end of the earth, kingdom of God up next thing? People get confused and make it eschatological. As if the physical earth had to pass away and the Kingdom of God/heaven be ushered in instead. This is indeed, one persepctive offered in the canon, and maybe the easiest to grasp for the masses. But it is not the only way to look at it.
Paul's gnostic viewpoint, Christ in you now, would indicate the Kingdom of God is already here. Some of Jesus' disciples see this, so the kingdom is here, for them at least, before they pass away. Christ supports this in Luke 17: Quote:
Quote:
This message is terribly confused by later, literalist redactors, unfortunately. |
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|