Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-26-2004, 07:55 AM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,396
|
ivory pomegranate faked?
Sole First Temple relic may be a forgery (Haaretz, 3/26/04).
|
03-26-2004, 08:07 AM | #2 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Re: Undisclosed sources: Lemaire's pomegranate a forgery
Quote:
I think all 1st temple artefacts should be considered questionale now until proven otherwise! spin |
|
03-26-2004, 03:21 PM | #3 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
|
Thanks, Apikorus. For everything.
|
03-26-2004, 05:31 PM | #4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,396
|
The Israel Museum coughed up a lot of dough for the pomegranate. Their antiquities director must be feeling rather queasy at the moment.
|
03-26-2004, 07:12 PM | #5 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Quote:
spin |
|
03-29-2004, 07:04 PM | #6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: rationalpagans.com
Posts: 7,400
|
ivory pomegranite faked?
(if this belongs somewhere else, please move--- this used to be the archaeology forum)
http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/spages/409140.html The only relic from Solomon's temple, on view in Israel since 1988, may be a fake by the same guys who did the Ossuary. just a FYI... |
03-29-2004, 07:56 PM | #7 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Same topic here:
{Deleted} |
03-29-2004, 07:59 PM | #8 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
The article was cited a few days ago {Deleted}
However it didn't raise much of a storm, though perhaps it should have. I guess people here are just to nt oriented, as a reaction to their rejection of xianity. -- Hey, Toto, stop sneaking in when I'm writing a response. spin |
03-30-2004, 09:26 AM | #9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: rationalpagans.com
Posts: 7,400
|
sorry--- I had done a quick glance and missed this...
This should be causing a fuss--- this is the definitive artifact that proved the time line of the OT, apparently. Without this, they are back to 'well, we think it happened'. However, at a minimum, when in a discussion re evolution and piltdown man is sited, we can counter with this--- both forgeries that do not discount the whole, although there is much less other than this to back the OT than there is for evo... Thanks for combining. |
03-30-2004, 10:41 AM | #10 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,396
|
outrageous action by moderators!
[TIC]
Mods: if you are going to change the title of the thread but keep me listed as the "starter," I would appreciate it if you would avoid spelling errors. The proper spelling of the fruit in question is "pomegranate." Your actions have resulted in the appearance that I am a poor speller, which is a grievous injury to my reputation! My initial thread title may have been long and unwieldy, but I did spell "pomegranate" correctly. Huffily, Apikorus [/TIC] |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|