Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
09-03-2004, 07:37 AM | #61 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
|
Quote:
The larger problem with your paragraph is that it assumes that the gospels are faithfully reporting events as they occurred. Only highly conservative scholars believe that. Most scholars who read the gospels take the position that they represent real events that have become heavily fictionalized and layered with Old Testament quotes, though they differ on what is fiction and what is not. Thus, the problem is (to cite a famous scholar): are we looking at history remembered, or prophecy historicized? Finding out what is actually history in there is very difficult. I'll give you an example. Mark 1:16-20 gives the famous calling of the apostles. Most scholars see this as parallel to Elijah's calling of Elisha. Note the parallels, listed in Brodie (2000, p91): *the action begins with a caller...and with motion toward those to be called; *those called are working (plowing/fishing); *the call, whether by gesture (Elijah) or word (Jesus) is brief; *later, the means of livelihood are variously destroyed or mended, the plow is destroyed, but the nets are mended -- a typical inversion of images...; *after further movement, there is a leave-taking of home; *there is also a leave-taking of other workers; *finally, those who called follow the caller. Now, hardly anyone denies that the early movement had apostles. What is at issue here is: is this an actual historical event, depicted faithfully, or has the writer of Mark chosen to recast more complex historical events as OT drama? How do we know which answer to choose? Vorkosigan |
|
09-03-2004, 07:51 AM | #62 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
Quote:
In addition, it is my understanding that the piercing described is related to the teeth of the dogs/lions. Crucifixion has to be read into this text. |
|
09-06-2004, 09:10 PM | #63 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 756
|
Quote:
Also, if the Bible is so accurate, why aren't the historical stories of it told in any place other than religious books? Why have we never found evidence of a huge world wide flood with the skeletons of all the little animals that died? It seems to me that your point is "The Bible is true, because the stories told in it actually happened. I know they happened because they're in the Bible." By the same logic, I can claim the Harry Potter is also real. |
|
09-07-2004, 05:01 AM | #64 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: England
Posts: 436
|
Hi Tiberius
You lost me a little on your reply, I for one regard the Bible as fiction not fact. The topic is that the brainwashed amongst us are fed answers that fit in with the Bible, however the Bible does not fit in with fact. So when I ask, Is all knowledge in the Bible, I do so on the basis that the reply is all made up and distorted, So many followers share the fantasy whilst the rest of us sit back in bewilderment at their world. I hope that this view does not offend too many people and that we can all accept each others opinion, and their is the irony in it all, how can fact be an opinion, they are either correct or wrong, I honestly believe they do not care either way, they are going to live forever while the rest of us will rot in hell. And the reason is that they believe the Bible has all the answers and we do not. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|