Crazy Diamond

-


Hi kiddos,


What do Atheism and Theism have in common? - Both are based on a belief. Atheism believes in the non-existence of a heavenly Creator.


How is Atheism a belief?


Wherever there is no knowledge being applied, there is a belief. Atheism is the blind reaction to the Theism's lack of understanding to decrypt Scriptural texts, while at the same time Atheism rejects the fact that eternal words of JEHAVEH in the Scriptures as originally written do not say "believe in me" but "remain in my words".


Does Atheism apply knowledge to the Scriptural texts which only require knowledge and understanding?


No, as it was quoted before, wherever there is no knowledge there is belief: Atheism in all its forms and expressions rejects the use of deduction and discernment that is required in order to make the distinction between the "versions" of the Scriptures and the Scriptures as originally written.


And by doing so, Atheism does COINCIDE with Theism which also acts as if the Scriptures as originally written required a belief in order to be interpreted and understood rather than the knowledge of the truth alone.



Theism is based in faith/belief on a religion rather than the knowledge of the truth alone.


Atheism is based on the reaction to Theism's lack of understanding.


The eternal words in the Scriptures and in the instructions of the apostles are based on discernment/understanding by which the same eternal words are kept, as it is attested by the eternal words saying: "If you love me you will keep my word".


-


While Atheism reacts the way that it does, automatically gives continuation to that same Theism's lack of understanding, as if the lack of faith[belief] promoted by the religions of the earth avoided the Atheism's understanding to decrypt Scriptural texts, sort of like giving an excuse to reject the use of knowledge/discernment.



The proof of Atheism's lack of understanding is that every Scriptural text is understandable and reasonable, but atheism acts as if one needed to have a faith/belief/religion in order to read and understand the Scriptures as originally written.


It is the Atheim's belief[assumption] which assumes that if you bring up any Scriptural text into discussion then you would necessarily be a part of a faith/belief/religion.


I don't have faith, I rather keep fidelity to the knowledge of the truth by keeping the eternal words alone.


You say that you are an Atheist, and the good thing about being an Atheist is that you reject the religions/beliefs and prostitutions[spiritual fornication] of souls of the earth. And it means that you must not believe[assume] either on the existence or non-existence of an Eternal and heavenly Superior Being, and it also means that you must not put any assumption above the knowledge of the truth.



How long will you use Atheism's pretexts[excuses and assumptions] in order to avoid the true debate that is a confrontation before the knowledge that I've brought up through the Scriptural texts?



-

Amaleq13

Using the words "scriptural text" doesn't make this preachy rant appropriate for BC&H. I'm locking it until I can figure out where it really belongs.

ETA: And Elsewhere is our lucky winner!!

Amaleq13, BC&H moderator