FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-28-2009, 12:26 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: France
Posts: 88
Default The Historical Jesus For Dummies

Hi,

We are used to discussing scholar works here, but I guess what is published for the layman is interesting to investigate as well.

Did anybody here read The Historical Jesus For Dummies (or via: amazon.co.uk) by Catherine M. Murphy? Is it worth recommending?

thx,

J.
Camio is offline  
Old 11-28-2009, 04:11 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,619
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Camio View Post
Hi,

We are used to discussing scholar works here, but I guess what is published for the layman is interesting to investigate as well.

Did anybody here read The Historical Jesus For Dummies by Catherine M. Murphy? Is it worth recommending?

thx,

J.
Are you asking whether the subject of the historicity of Jesus is one ideally suited for academic dummies or for non-academic dummies? .
Iskander is offline  
Old 11-28-2009, 04:17 PM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: MT
Posts: 10,656
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Camio View Post
Hi,

We are used to discussing scholar works here, but I guess what is published for the layman is interesting to investigate as well.

Did anybody here read The Historical Jesus For Dummies (or via: amazon.co.uk) by Catherine M. Murphy? Is it worth recommending?

thx,

J.
I haven't read it, and I don't know if it is a good book, but it is certainly a good idea. Too many books on Jesus are either uselessly ideological or incomprehensibly academic. There needs to be more educational books on Jesus for the lay reader. You should read the book and give the rest of us a report.
ApostateAbe is offline  
Old 11-28-2009, 04:28 PM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

One of the reviews:

Quote:
Apt title: very disappointing, April 12, 2009
By eagle eye
I bought this book perhaps foolishly expecting a review of genuine historical research into the life of the man at the center of Christianity. NOT THIS BOOK.

This is written by someone deeply invested in the religious view of Jesus, for example, she writes, 'I will take you through the events of the crucifixion and resurrection and tell you what most likely happened'.

Good grief; you know? How exactly? I got the strong sense that the author could give no historical evidence that the man Jesus ever existed. Can that be true?
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 11-28-2009, 11:46 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
Default

The author makes a good point.

If the Jews rejected Jesus, why did the Romans crucify him as a possible Messianic candidate?
Steven Carr is offline  
Old 11-29-2009, 01:22 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bordeaux France
Posts: 2,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Carr View Post
The author makes a good point.

If the Jews rejected Jesus, why did the Romans crucify him as a possible Messianic candidate?
Did the Jews reject Jesus before, or after the crucifiction ?

Supposing that Jesus was a Messianic candidate, it is "normal" that he was crucified by the Roman authority, when they caught him.

Supposing that Jesus was a Messianic candidate, and that he was crucified by the Roman authority, it could be understandable that the Jews rejected Jesus, as a failed Messiah.

Supposing that the Jews rejected Jesus, as a failed Messiah, the partisans of this Jesus were no longer a danger to the Roman empire, especially when an agent of the Sadducean lackeys, Saul, provoked a split inside the small remaining group, with the harmless idea that the revolution was not national, nor social, but personal.
Huon is offline  
Old 11-29-2009, 02:18 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
Default

So why on earth did the Jews think of Jesus as a Messianic candidate, before his death?
Steven Carr is offline  
Old 11-29-2009, 03:01 AM   #8
avi
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Location: eastern North America
Posts: 1,468
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Carr View Post
...
If the Jews rejected Jesus, why did the Romans crucify him as a possible Messianic candidate?
Is there some source apart from the New Testament, documenting Jesus' supposed crucifixion?

In my opinion, the Romans were interested in commerce, and extraction of mineral wealth and agricultural products, not religious nonsense. I think crucifixion was reserved for criminals and enemies of the Roman state.

I doubt the theory that Jesus or anyone else, was crucified for preaching imminent apocalypse.
avi is offline  
Old 11-29-2009, 05:40 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,619
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Huon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Carr View Post
The author makes a good point.

If the Jews rejected Jesus, why did the Romans crucify him as a possible Messianic candidate?
Did the Jews reject Jesus before, or after the crucifiction ?

Supposing that Jesus was a Messianic candidate, it is "normal" that he was crucified by the Roman authority, when they caught him.

Supposing that Jesus was a Messianic candidate, and that he was crucified by the Roman authority, it could be understandable that the Jews rejected Jesus, as a failed Messiah.

Supposing that the Jews rejected Jesus, as a failed Messiah, the partisans of this Jesus were no longer a danger to the Roman empire, especially when an agent of the Sadducean lackeys, Saul, provoked a split inside the small remaining group, with the harmless idea that the revolution was not national, nor social, but personal.
Some Jews rejected Jesus, but not all.

Jesus is the redeemer of mankind and what some Jews may or may not have done in the distant past is best forgotten as no longer relevant to the reality of today.
Iskander is offline  
Old 11-29-2009, 07:40 AM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iskander View Post
Some Jews rejected Jesus, but not all.
I agree with "not all." But most of them did, according to all the stories.

But then, so did most non-Jews in that part of the world for the first few hundred years of Christianity's existence.
Doug Shaver is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:40 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.